The Danish landscape of providing support for caregivers of people with potentially life-threatening disease: A cross-sectional study among representatives of health services in Danish municipalities and hospitals.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1177/14034948231159464
Karin B Dieperink, Jens-Jakob K Møller, Tina B Mikkelsen, Nina Konstantin Nissen, Karen La Cour, Nina Rottmann
{"title":"The Danish landscape of providing support for caregivers of people with potentially life-threatening disease: A cross-sectional study among representatives of health services in Danish municipalities and hospitals.","authors":"Karin B Dieperink, Jens-Jakob K Møller, Tina B Mikkelsen, Nina Konstantin Nissen, Karen La Cour, Nina Rottmann","doi":"10.1177/14034948231159464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>(a) To investigate support for caregivers of people diagnosed with stroke, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, or heart disease provided across healthcare settings in Denmark; (b) to assess differences in caregiver support across diagnoses and settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional nationwide survey among professionals representing healthcare settings at municipalities (<i>n</i> = 479) and hospital wards and outpatient clinics (<i>n</i> = 425). The survey assessed identification of caregivers and support initiatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 81% for municipalities and 49% for hospitals. Identification of caregivers was frequent in dementia care (81% and 100%) and less frequent in COPD care (58% and 64%) in municipalities and hospitals, respectively. Caregiver support differed significantly across diagnoses within municipalities (<i>p</i> = 0.009) and hospitals (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Systematic identification of vulnerable caregivers was <25% for all diagnoses except dementia. The most common support initiatives involving caregivers were primarily aimed at the ill person and included guidance about the disease and consequences for everyday life and lifestyle changes. Caregivers were least involved in support initiatives addressing physical training, work retention, sexuality, or cohabitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Disparities and significant differences across diagnoses exist in the identification of caregivers and the provision of support initiatives. Support initiatives involving caregivers primarily targeted patients. Future studies should investigate how caregivers' needs can be met across different diagnoses and healthcare settings and investigate potential changes in caregivers' needs during disease trajectories. In clinical practice, identification of vulnerable caregivers should be a major focus, and disease-specific clinical guidelines may be required to ensure sufficient support for caregivers.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948231159464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: (a) To investigate support for caregivers of people diagnosed with stroke, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, or heart disease provided across healthcare settings in Denmark; (b) to assess differences in caregiver support across diagnoses and settings.

Methods: A cross-sectional nationwide survey among professionals representing healthcare settings at municipalities (n = 479) and hospital wards and outpatient clinics (n = 425). The survey assessed identification of caregivers and support initiatives.

Results: The response rate was 81% for municipalities and 49% for hospitals. Identification of caregivers was frequent in dementia care (81% and 100%) and less frequent in COPD care (58% and 64%) in municipalities and hospitals, respectively. Caregiver support differed significantly across diagnoses within municipalities (p = 0.009) and hospitals (p < 0.001). Systematic identification of vulnerable caregivers was <25% for all diagnoses except dementia. The most common support initiatives involving caregivers were primarily aimed at the ill person and included guidance about the disease and consequences for everyday life and lifestyle changes. Caregivers were least involved in support initiatives addressing physical training, work retention, sexuality, or cohabitation.

Conclusions: Disparities and significant differences across diagnoses exist in the identification of caregivers and the provision of support initiatives. Support initiatives involving caregivers primarily targeted patients. Future studies should investigate how caregivers' needs can be met across different diagnoses and healthcare settings and investigate potential changes in caregivers' needs during disease trajectories. In clinical practice, identification of vulnerable caregivers should be a major focus, and disease-specific clinical guidelines may be required to ensure sufficient support for caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦为可能危及生命的疾病患者的照顾者提供支持的情况:一项针对丹麦城市和医院医疗服务机构代表的横断面研究。
目的:(a) 调查丹麦不同医疗机构为中风、癌症、慢性阻塞性肺病 (COPD)、痴呆症或心脏病患者的护理人员提供的支持;(b) 评估不同诊断和医疗机构对护理人员支持的差异:方法:在全国范围内对市镇医疗机构(479 人)、医院病房和门诊诊所(425 人)的专业人员进行横向调查。调查评估了护理人员的身份和支持措施:结果:市政当局的回复率为 81%,医院的回复率为 49%。在市政府和医院中,对痴呆症护理人员的识别率较高(分别为 81% 和 100%),而对慢性阻塞性肺病护理人员的识别率较低(分别为 58% 和 64%)。在不同的诊断中,护理人员的支持在城市(p = 0.009)和医院(p < 0.001)之间存在显著差异。对弱势护理人员的系统识别得出结论: 在识别护理人员和提供支持性措施方面,不同诊断存在差异和明显不同。涉及护理人员的支持措施主要针对患者。未来的研究应探讨如何在不同的诊断和医疗环境中满足护理者的需求,并调查护理者的需求在疾病过程中可能发生的变化。在临床实践中,应重点识别易受伤害的照顾者,可能需要制定针对特定疾病的临床指南,以确保为照顾者提供足够的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
Exploring variations in subjective well-being among Norwegian retirees: A growth mixture modelling approach. Perceived social support and symptoms of depression and anxiety in emerging adulthood: A Swedish prospective cohort study. Rural-urban and geographical differences in prognosis of atrial fibrillation in Finland: a nationwide cohort study. Acts of offensive behaviour and risk of disability pension in Danish female eldercare workers: prospective cohort with 11-year register follow-up. Socioeconomic differences in children's victimization to maternal and paternal violence: a register-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1