Introduction of America's Health Systems Science Education and Its Criticism.

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Korean Journal of Medical History Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.519
Taekjoong Kim
{"title":"Introduction of America's Health Systems Science Education and Its Criticism.","authors":"Taekjoong Kim","doi":"10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, Korean medical education circles have proposed a fullscale introduction of America’s health systems science to replace the existing medical humanities education in Korea. The so-called Flexner education system, formed in the early 20th century, was centered on basic and clinical sciences. America’s health systems science education was introduced to supplement the system. The full-scale introduction of health systems science has been promoted, mainly by the Korean Association of Medical Colleges. However, it does not fit into the current circumstance of Korean medical education circles. It is deemed that there are political reasons behind the push – the alignment of interests between the medical education circles and the government. This study first examined the social and cultural circumstances behind the emergence of health systems science in America, focusing on pragmatism, a native American ideology, to critique the background of the introduction of the American system. It also discussed the negative aspects of pragmatism in American medical education in the cases of American educators Ralph Tyler and Abraham Flexner. Then, it specifically examined the background and reasons for introducing America’s health systems science to Korea and discussed the problems of directly introducing the health systems science to Korea without any adaptation process through a comparative analysis with existing medical humanities. Finally, it suggested a more desirable adaptation form of health systems science that can be considered for its implementation in Korea.","PeriodicalId":42441,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Medical History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10556357/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Recently, Korean medical education circles have proposed a fullscale introduction of America’s health systems science to replace the existing medical humanities education in Korea. The so-called Flexner education system, formed in the early 20th century, was centered on basic and clinical sciences. America’s health systems science education was introduced to supplement the system. The full-scale introduction of health systems science has been promoted, mainly by the Korean Association of Medical Colleges. However, it does not fit into the current circumstance of Korean medical education circles. It is deemed that there are political reasons behind the push – the alignment of interests between the medical education circles and the government. This study first examined the social and cultural circumstances behind the emergence of health systems science in America, focusing on pragmatism, a native American ideology, to critique the background of the introduction of the American system. It also discussed the negative aspects of pragmatism in American medical education in the cases of American educators Ralph Tyler and Abraham Flexner. Then, it specifically examined the background and reasons for introducing America’s health systems science to Korea and discussed the problems of directly introducing the health systems science to Korea without any adaptation process through a comparative analysis with existing medical humanities. Finally, it suggested a more desirable adaptation form of health systems science that can be considered for its implementation in Korea.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国卫生系统科学教育概论及其批评。
最近,韩国医学教育界提议全面引入美国的卫生系统科学,以取代韩国现有的医学人文教育。20世纪初形成的所谓Flexner教育体系以基础科学和临床科学为中心。美国的卫生系统科学教育是对该系统的补充。主要由韩国医学院协会推动全面引进卫生系统科学。但是,它并不适合韩国医学教育界的现状。人们认为,这一推动背后有政治原因——医学教育界和政府之间的利益一致。本研究首先考察了美国卫生系统科学出现背后的社会和文化环境,重点关注实用主义这一美国本土意识形态,以批判美国卫生系统引入的背景。它还以美国教育家拉尔夫·泰勒和亚伯拉罕·弗莱克斯纳为例,讨论了实用主义在美国医学教育中的负面影响。然后,具体考察了美国卫生系统科学引入韩国的背景和原因,并通过与现有医学人文学科的比较分析,讨论了在没有任何适应过程的情况下直接将卫生系统科学引进韩国的问题。最后,它提出了一种更可取的卫生系统科学适应形式,可以考虑在韩国实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Joseph Needham's 'Motivations for Participation' and 'Major Roles' in the International Scientific Commission on Bacterial Warfare during the Korean War. Medical Support Provided by the UN's Scandinavian Allies during the Korean War. Behind the Protein Battle Lines in the 1970s: Nutritional Turmoil in the Postwar World. Ideals and Reality of Public Health Nursing in Korea: Influence of U.S. Nurse Advisors, 1945~1961. Important Drugs and Its Patterns during the Late Goryeo Dynasty -Obtain and distribution of Bupleuri Radix and Ginger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1