[The involvement of older adults in the residential care: dilemmas, pitfalls and potentials].

Marije Blok, Barbara Groot, Johanna M Huijg, Alice H de Boer
{"title":"[The involvement of older adults in the residential care: dilemmas, pitfalls and potentials].","authors":"Marije Blok,&nbsp;Barbara Groot,&nbsp;Johanna M Huijg,&nbsp;Alice H de Boer","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the residential care sector we have witnessed throughout the previous decades a development from a rather paternalistic approach towards a more democratic way of care giving. In many care organizations, however, residents are still rarely involved in the daily routine. In a participatory study on a somatic care unit in the Netherlands, we examined the challenges around the involvement of residents in the care residence. We organized two homogeneous group sessions, with staff and residents separately; reflected on new ways for involving residents; and concluded with a heterogeneous focus group, bringing staff and residents together. Both staff and residents recognized the importance of resident involvement in daily care. However, the difference in perspective on what this should look like created challenges. We found three dilemmas that made the engagement of residents challenging: autonomy versus dependence, personal experiences versus privacy, and happiness versus honesty. We found different ways staff and residents dealt with these dilemmas in practice and defined them in terms of bottlenecks and opportunities. Attention to these dilemmas, pitfalls, and potentials, promotes mutual understanding and ultimately resident involvement in daily care.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2023.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the residential care sector we have witnessed throughout the previous decades a development from a rather paternalistic approach towards a more democratic way of care giving. In many care organizations, however, residents are still rarely involved in the daily routine. In a participatory study on a somatic care unit in the Netherlands, we examined the challenges around the involvement of residents in the care residence. We organized two homogeneous group sessions, with staff and residents separately; reflected on new ways for involving residents; and concluded with a heterogeneous focus group, bringing staff and residents together. Both staff and residents recognized the importance of resident involvement in daily care. However, the difference in perspective on what this should look like created challenges. We found three dilemmas that made the engagement of residents challenging: autonomy versus dependence, personal experiences versus privacy, and happiness versus honesty. We found different ways staff and residents dealt with these dilemmas in practice and defined them in terms of bottlenecks and opportunities. Attention to these dilemmas, pitfalls, and potentials, promotes mutual understanding and ultimately resident involvement in daily care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人参与住宿照顾:困境、陷阱和潜力。
在过去的几十年里,我们目睹了寄宿护理部门从一种相当家长式的方法向一种更民主的护理方式的发展。然而,在许多护理机构,居民仍然很少参与日常事务。在荷兰的一项关于躯体护理单位的参与性研究中,我们研究了护理住宅中居民参与的挑战。我们组织了两次同质的小组会议,工作人员和住院医生分别参加;反思居民参与的新方式;最后是一个不同的焦点小组,把工作人员和居民聚集在一起。工作人员和住院医生都认识到住院医生参与日常护理的重要性。然而,关于这应该是什么样子的不同观点带来了挑战。我们发现了三个难题,使居民的参与具有挑战性:自主与依赖,个人体验与隐私,幸福与诚实。在实践中,我们找到了员工和住院医生处理这些困境的不同方法,并根据瓶颈和机会对它们进行了定义。注意这些困境,陷阱和潜力,促进相互理解和最终住院医生参与日常护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Ervaringen met COVID-19 maatregelen onder oudere Nederlandse thuiswonende migranten [Evaluation of an information booklet on end-of-life care in dementia: a mixed-methods study assessing the preferences of family caregivers and healthcare professionals]. Onderzoek naar kwetsbaarheid bij ouderen: waar staan we 15 jaar na het Nationaal Programma Ouderenzorg? [The tradeoff between an open or closed unit for residents with dementia: a qualitative study]. [Experiences, wishes and needs of patients with regard to patient participation during geriatric rehabilitation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1