PARP Inhibitors for the Treatment of BRCA1/2-Mutated Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Ranju Kunwor, Daniel P Silver, Maysa Abu-Khalaf
{"title":"PARP Inhibitors for the Treatment of BRCA1/2-Mutated Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ranju Kunwor,&nbsp;Daniel P Silver,&nbsp;Maysa Abu-Khalaf","doi":"10.56875/2589-0646.1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The PARP inhibitors (PARPis) olaparib and talazoparib are currently approved for the treatment of deleterious germline BRCA1/2-mutated (gBRCA+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). These approvals were based on improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) observed in two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Other PARPis, such as veliparib and niraparib, have also been studied. We conducted this meta-analysis of RCTs to assess the PFS and overall survival (OS) benefits of PARPis in gBRCA + MBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search for RCTs using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to March 2021. Only phase II and III RCTs evaluating PFS and OS for PARPis alone or in combination with chemotherapy (CT) and comparing the findings with standard CT were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of the hazard ratio (HR) was performed with RevMan v5.4 using a random effects method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five RCTs with a total of 1563 BRCA-mutated MBC patients were included in this meta-analysis. Temozolomide was used in the treatment arm in the BROCADE trial. Since temozolomide has limited effects on breast cancer, this arm was excluded from our meta-analysis. A statistically significant increase in PFS was observed in the PARPi group compared to the standard CT group (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56-0.74; P < 0.00001). However, the differences in OS did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.02; P = 0.09). Moreover, differences were not observed in the adverse event profile between the two groups (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.84-1.64; P = 0.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our meta-analysis confirm the previously reported PFS benefit of PARPis over standard CT. PARPis lead to superior PFS in gBRCA + MBC when used alone or in combination with standard CT. The OS benefit is similar between PARPis and standard CT. Ongoing trials are evaluating the benefits of PARPis in early stage gBRCA + BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":39226,"journal":{"name":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","volume":"16 3","pages":"186-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56875/2589-0646.1033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The PARP inhibitors (PARPis) olaparib and talazoparib are currently approved for the treatment of deleterious germline BRCA1/2-mutated (gBRCA+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). These approvals were based on improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) observed in two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Other PARPis, such as veliparib and niraparib, have also been studied. We conducted this meta-analysis of RCTs to assess the PFS and overall survival (OS) benefits of PARPis in gBRCA + MBC.

Methods: We performed a systematic search for RCTs using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to March 2021. Only phase II and III RCTs evaluating PFS and OS for PARPis alone or in combination with chemotherapy (CT) and comparing the findings with standard CT were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis of the hazard ratio (HR) was performed with RevMan v5.4 using a random effects method.

Results: Five RCTs with a total of 1563 BRCA-mutated MBC patients were included in this meta-analysis. Temozolomide was used in the treatment arm in the BROCADE trial. Since temozolomide has limited effects on breast cancer, this arm was excluded from our meta-analysis. A statistically significant increase in PFS was observed in the PARPi group compared to the standard CT group (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56-0.74; P < 0.00001). However, the differences in OS did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.02; P = 0.09). Moreover, differences were not observed in the adverse event profile between the two groups (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.84-1.64; P = 0.33).

Conclusion: The results of our meta-analysis confirm the previously reported PFS benefit of PARPis over standard CT. PARPis lead to superior PFS in gBRCA + MBC when used alone or in combination with standard CT. The OS benefit is similar between PARPis and standard CT. Ongoing trials are evaluating the benefits of PARPis in early stage gBRCA + BC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PARP抑制剂治疗brca1 /2突变转移性乳腺癌:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:PARP抑制剂(parpi)奥拉帕尼和塔拉唑帕尼目前被批准用于治疗有害种系brca1 /2突变(gBRCA+)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)。这些批准是基于两项随机对照试验(rct)中观察到的无进展生存期(PFS)的改善。其他parpi,如veliparib和niraparib,也被研究过。我们对rct进行了荟萃分析,以评估PARPis在gBRCA + MBC中的PFS和总生存期(OS)益处。方法:我们使用Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库对截至2021年3月的rct进行了系统搜索。本荟萃分析仅包括评估PARPis单独或联合化疗(CT)的PFS和OS并将结果与标准CT进行比较的II期和III期rct。采用随机效应法,采用RevMan v5.4软件对风险比(HR)进行汇总分析。结果:5项随机对照试验共纳入1563例brca突变的MBC患者。在BROCADE试验中,替莫唑胺用于治疗组。由于替莫唑胺对乳腺癌的影响有限,因此我们的荟萃分析排除了这一组。与标准CT组相比,PARPi组的PFS有统计学意义的增加(HR, 0.64;95% ci, 0.56-0.74;P < 0.00001)。但OS差异无统计学意义(HR, 0.89;95% ci, 0.77-1.02;P = 0.09)。此外,两组的不良事件发生率无差异(优势比,1.18;95% ci, 0.84-1.64;P = 0.33)。结论:我们的荟萃分析结果证实了先前报道的PARPis优于标准CT的PFS益处。单独使用或与标准CT联合使用PARPis可在gBRCA + MBC中获得更好的PFS。parpi和标准CT之间的OS收益相似。正在进行的试验正在评估parpi在早期gBRCA + BC中的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematology Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides a vehicle for publications of high-quality clinical as well as basic science research reports in hematology and oncology. The contents of the journal also emphasize the growing importance of hematopoietic stem cell therapy for treatment of various benign and malignant hematologic disorders and certain solid tumors.The journal prioritizes publication of original research articles but also would give consideration for brief reports, review articles, special communications, and unique case reports. It also offers a special section for clinically relevant images that provide an important educational value.
期刊最新文献
Side Effects After Use of Bedside Thaw Method for Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Allogeneic Transplantations in a Pediatric Cohort: A Single-center Experience. Role of Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Adult Immune Hematological Diseases. Improved Quality of Life of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: Another Indication for Transplant. Therapy-related Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: Risk, Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factor Analysis. Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intraluminal Brachytherapy vs Isolated Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage with internalization for Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Prospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1