A Feasibility Evaluation of the Need-Centered Watch-Assess-Need Intervention-Think Education and Training Program for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000548
Yueh-Ying Yang, Ya-Ping Yang, Kuei-Min Chen, Chi-Jane Wang, Su-Hsien Chang, Jing-Jy Wang
{"title":"A Feasibility Evaluation of the Need-Centered Watch-Assess-Need Intervention-Think Education and Training Program for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.","authors":"Yueh-Ying Yang,&nbsp;Ya-Ping Yang,&nbsp;Kuei-Min Chen,&nbsp;Chi-Jane Wang,&nbsp;Su-Hsien Chang,&nbsp;Jing-Jy Wang","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the high prevalence of dementia among residents living in long-term care facilities in Taiwan, most care providers in these facilities have not received adequate training to deal with the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). An original care and management model for BPSD has been developed, and model-based recommendations for an education and training program have been made. However, empirical testing has not yet been conducted to determine the efficacy of this program.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of using the Watch-Assess-Need intervention-Think (WANT) education and training program for BPSD in long-term care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method design was used. Twenty care providers and 20 corresponding care receivers (residents with dementia) from a nursing home in southern Taiwan were enrolled. Data were collected using a variety of measurement tools, including the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, Attitude towards Dementia Care Scale, and Dementia Behavior Disturbance Self-efficacy Scale. Qualitative data, including care-provider perspectives on the efficacy of the WANT education and training program, were also collected. Repeated measures were conducted on the results of quantitative data analysis, whereas content analysis was performed on the results of qualitative data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that the program relieves agitated behavior (p = .01), alleviates depression in those with dementia (p < .001), and enhances care-provider attitudes toward dementia care (p = .01). However, no significant improvement was found in self-efficacy among the care providers (p = .11). In terms of qualitative outcomes, care providers indicated they perceived improved self-efficacy in managing BPSD, improved ability to view problems from a more need-centered perspective, improved attitudes toward dementia and patients' BPSD, and decreased care burden and stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The study found the WANT education and training program to be feasible in clinical practice. Because of this program's simple and easy-to-remember characteristics, it is recommended that it be vigorously promoted to care providers in both long-term institutional and home care settings to help them effectively address the BPSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"31 2","pages":"e266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the high prevalence of dementia among residents living in long-term care facilities in Taiwan, most care providers in these facilities have not received adequate training to deal with the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). An original care and management model for BPSD has been developed, and model-based recommendations for an education and training program have been made. However, empirical testing has not yet been conducted to determine the efficacy of this program.

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of using the Watch-Assess-Need intervention-Think (WANT) education and training program for BPSD in long-term care settings.

Methods: A mixed-method design was used. Twenty care providers and 20 corresponding care receivers (residents with dementia) from a nursing home in southern Taiwan were enrolled. Data were collected using a variety of measurement tools, including the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, Attitude towards Dementia Care Scale, and Dementia Behavior Disturbance Self-efficacy Scale. Qualitative data, including care-provider perspectives on the efficacy of the WANT education and training program, were also collected. Repeated measures were conducted on the results of quantitative data analysis, whereas content analysis was performed on the results of qualitative data analysis.

Results: Findings indicate that the program relieves agitated behavior (p = .01), alleviates depression in those with dementia (p < .001), and enhances care-provider attitudes toward dementia care (p = .01). However, no significant improvement was found in self-efficacy among the care providers (p = .11). In terms of qualitative outcomes, care providers indicated they perceived improved self-efficacy in managing BPSD, improved ability to view problems from a more need-centered perspective, improved attitudes toward dementia and patients' BPSD, and decreased care burden and stress.

Conclusions/implications for practice: The study found the WANT education and training program to be feasible in clinical practice. Because of this program's simple and easy-to-remember characteristics, it is recommended that it be vigorously promoted to care providers in both long-term institutional and home care settings to help them effectively address the BPSD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以需求为中心的观察-评估-需求干预-思考教育与训练方案对痴呆行为与心理症状的可行性评估
背景:尽管台湾居住在长期照护机构的居民有较高的痴呆症患病率,但这些机构的大多数照护提供者并未接受足够的训练来处理痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)。已经为BPSD开发了一个原始的护理和管理模式,并提出了基于模型的教育和培训计划建议。然而,尚未进行实证测试来确定该计划的有效性。目的:本研究旨在评估观察-评估-需要-干预-思考(WANT)教育和培训计划在BPSD长期护理机构中的可行性。方法:采用混合法设计。本研究选取台湾南部一家养老院的20名照护提供者和20名相应的照护接受者(痴呆症患者)。数据收集使用多种测量工具,包括Cohen-Mansfield躁动量表、Cornell痴呆抑郁量表、痴呆护理态度量表和痴呆行为障碍自我效能量表。还收集了定性数据,包括护理提供者对WANT教育和培训计划有效性的看法。对定量数据分析结果进行重复测量,对定性数据分析结果进行内容分析。结果:研究结果表明,该项目可减轻痴呆患者的激动行为(p = 0.01),减轻痴呆患者的抑郁(p < 0.001),并提高护理人员对痴呆护理的态度(p = 0.01)。然而,护理人员的自我效能感没有显著改善(p = 0.11)。在定性结果方面,护理提供者表示他们在管理BPSD方面提高了自我效能,从更以需求为中心的角度看待问题的能力提高了,对痴呆和患者BPSD的态度改善了,护理负担和压力减轻了。结论/实践意义:研究发现WANT教育和培训计划在临床实践中是可行的。由于这个程序简单易记的特点,建议大力推广给长期机构和家庭护理机构的护理提供者,以帮助他们有效地解决BPSD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Journal of Nursing Research (JNR) is comprised of original articles that come from a variety of national and international institutions and reflect trends and issues of contemporary nursing practice in Taiwan. All articles are published in English so that JNR can better serve the whole nursing profession and introduce nursing in Taiwan to people around the world. Topics cover not only the field of nursing but also related fields such as psychology, education, management and statistics.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Management in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Comorbid Diabetes: A Focused Ethnography Study. Exploring the Difficulties and Strategies of Family Caregivers in Caring for Patients With Dementia in Acute Care Wards. Correlation Among Workplace Burnout, Resilience, and Well-Being in Nursing Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. Factors Associated With HIV-Related Stigma Among Indonesian Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1