Contributions of the voluntary local review process to policy integration: evidence from frontrunner cities

IF 9.1 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES npj urban sustainability Pub Date : 2023-04-06 DOI:10.1038/s42949-023-00101-4
Fernando Ortiz-Moya, Marco Reggiani
{"title":"Contributions of the voluntary local review process to policy integration: evidence from frontrunner cities","authors":"Fernando Ortiz-Moya, Marco Reggiani","doi":"10.1038/s42949-023-00101-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) relies on effective policy integration at all levels of government. However, integration across policy domains remains challenging for local authorities, particularly when it comes to articulating policies that recognise trade-offs and interactions between different SDGs. This study explores how the Voluntary Local Review (VLR) process—a tool to localise the 2030 Agenda—contributes to policy integration by thematically analysing interviews with city officials in 12 frontrunner cities that conducted a VLR between 2019 and 2020. Our results suggest three main ways in which the VLR process affects policy integration: (1) by facilitating cooperation and interdependencies between different policy sectors; (2) by creating new instruments to mainstream SDGs; and (3) by enhancing sustainability competencies. Hence, our study suggests that conducting a VLR has the transformative potential to achieve greater policy integration and further the 2030 Agenda.","PeriodicalId":74322,"journal":{"name":"npj urban sustainability","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078030/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj urban sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42949-023-00101-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) relies on effective policy integration at all levels of government. However, integration across policy domains remains challenging for local authorities, particularly when it comes to articulating policies that recognise trade-offs and interactions between different SDGs. This study explores how the Voluntary Local Review (VLR) process—a tool to localise the 2030 Agenda—contributes to policy integration by thematically analysing interviews with city officials in 12 frontrunner cities that conducted a VLR between 2019 and 2020. Our results suggest three main ways in which the VLR process affects policy integration: (1) by facilitating cooperation and interdependencies between different policy sectors; (2) by creating new instruments to mainstream SDGs; and (3) by enhancing sustainability competencies. Hence, our study suggests that conducting a VLR has the transformative potential to achieve greater policy integration and further the 2030 Agenda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方自愿审查程序对政策整合的贡献:来自领先城市的证据
可持续发展目标 (SDG) 的实施有赖于各级政府有效的政策整合。然而,对于地方政府来说,跨政策领域的整合仍具有挑战性,尤其是在制定政策时要认识到不同可持续发展目标之间的权衡和相互作用。本研究通过对 2019 年至 2020 年间开展自愿地方审查(VLR)的 12 个领跑城市的城市官员的访谈进行专题分析,探讨自愿地方审查(VLR)过程--2030 年议程地方化的工具--如何促进政策整合。我们的研究结果表明,VLR 过程影响政策整合的方式主要有三种:(1) 促进不同政策部门之间的合作和相互依存;(2) 创造将可持续发展目标纳入主流的新工具;(3) 提高可持续发展能力。因此,我们的研究表明,开展脆弱性、长期性和可持续 性审查具有实现更大的政策整合和推进 2030 年议程的变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post construction infrastructural adaptation of social practices in Dhaka’s under flyover spaces More extremely hot days, more heat exposure and fewer cooling options for people of color in Connecticut, U.S. Stakeholders’ perceptions of and willingness to pay for circular economy in the construction sector Accelerating circularity systemically: three directions for impactful research Cross-scale consumption-based simulation models can promote sustainable metropolitan food systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1