Wrangling Diabetes: Illuminating the Latent Processes That Impact Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors.

Kristin Pullyblank, Amanda Fink
{"title":"Wrangling Diabetes: Illuminating the Latent Processes That Impact Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors.","authors":"Kristin Pullyblank,&nbsp;Amanda Fink","doi":"10.1177/26350106221144961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to discern the mechanisms that impact diabetes self-management from the perspective of individuals living with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a critical realist perspective, this qualitative descriptive study enrolled 54 individuals living with diabetes who had been exposed to diabetes self-management education and support within the previous 3 years. Focus groups were conducted between January and March 2021. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overarching theme was wrangling diabetes: getting in control. Enablers to getting in control included professional and informal support and constant reassurance that they were on the right track. Individual-level barriers to getting in control included competing priorities, difficult emotions, and financial concerns. Health system barriers included inconsistent messaging from providers, lack of care coordination, and insurance driving treatment decisions. The latent force underlying these barriers was the limited agency individuals with diabetes had in reference to self-management behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the health care system ostensibly wants individuals to be in control of and responsible for managing their diabetes, system-level structures and processes do not allow for some people living with diabetes to effectively self-manage.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":"49 1","pages":"23-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106221144961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to discern the mechanisms that impact diabetes self-management from the perspective of individuals living with diabetes.

Methods: Using a critical realist perspective, this qualitative descriptive study enrolled 54 individuals living with diabetes who had been exposed to diabetes self-management education and support within the previous 3 years. Focus groups were conducted between January and March 2021. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop themes and subthemes.

Results: The overarching theme was wrangling diabetes: getting in control. Enablers to getting in control included professional and informal support and constant reassurance that they were on the right track. Individual-level barriers to getting in control included competing priorities, difficult emotions, and financial concerns. Health system barriers included inconsistent messaging from providers, lack of care coordination, and insurance driving treatment decisions. The latent force underlying these barriers was the limited agency individuals with diabetes had in reference to self-management behaviors.

Conclusions: Although the health care system ostensibly wants individuals to be in control of and responsible for managing their diabetes, system-level structures and processes do not allow for some people living with diabetes to effectively self-manage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
争论糖尿病:阐明影响糖尿病自我管理行为的潜在过程。
目的:本研究旨在从糖尿病患者的角度探讨影响糖尿病自我管理的机制。方法:采用批判现实主义的观点,本定性描述性研究招募了54名糖尿病患者,他们在过去3年内接受过糖尿病自我管理教育和支持。焦点小组在2021年1月至3月期间进行了调查。反身性主位分析用于发展主位和副主位。结果:最重要的主题是争论糖尿病:控制。帮助他们掌控局面的因素包括专业和非正式的支持,以及对他们在正确轨道上的不断保证。个人层面的控制障碍包括竞争优先级,困难的情绪和财务问题。卫生系统障碍包括来自提供者的信息不一致、缺乏护理协调以及保险驱动治疗决策。这些障碍背后的潜在力量是糖尿病患者在自我管理行为方面的有限代理。结论:虽然卫生保健系统表面上希望个人能够控制和负责管理他们的糖尿病,但系统层面的结构和流程不允许一些糖尿病患者有效地自我管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs in the Dominican Republic (DR-DAWN2). A Minimally Time-Consuming Method for Regular, Ongoing Outcome Assessments in a Rural Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program: Validation via Retrospective Pre-Post Studies. Assessing Current Knowledge of Hearing Impairment With Diabetes by Surveying Providers With CBDCE Certification. Food Insecurity and Depressive Symptoms Among Persons With Diabetes in the United States: Findings From the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Medication-Taking Trajectory and Its Correlates in Patients With Diabetes: Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1