Lagging coverage for mental health services among children and adolescents through home and community-based Medicaid waivers

Jessica Keim-Malpass PhD, RN, Leeza Constantoulakis PhD, RN, Emily K. Shaw MSN, CPNP-BC, Lisa C. Letzkus PhD, RN, CPNP-AC
{"title":"Lagging coverage for mental health services among children and adolescents through home and community-based Medicaid waivers","authors":"Jessica Keim-Malpass PhD, RN,&nbsp;Leeza Constantoulakis PhD, RN,&nbsp;Emily K. Shaw MSN, CPNP-BC,&nbsp;Lisa C. Letzkus PhD, RN, CPNP-AC","doi":"10.1111/jcap.12392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Problem</h3>\n \n <p>Many states cover mental health home and community-based services (HCBS) for youth through 1915(c) Medicaid HCBS waivers that allow states to waive certain Medicaid eligibility criteria and define high-risk populations based on age, medical condition(s), and disability status. We sought to evaluate how States are covering children and adolescents with mental health needs through 1915(c) waivers compared to other youth waiver populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data elements were extracted from Medicaid 1915(c) approved waivers applications for all included waivers targeting any pediatric age range through October 31, 2018. Normalization criteria were developed and an aggregate overall coverage score and level of funding per person per waiver were calculated for each waiver.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and forty-two waivers across 45 states were included in this analysis. Even though there was uniformity in the Medicaid applications, there was great heterogeneity in how waiver eligibility, transition plans, services covered, and wait lists were defined across group classifications. Those with mental health needs (termed serious emotional disturbance) represented 5% of waivers with the least annual funding per person per waiver.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We recommend greater links between public policy, infrastructure, health care providers, and a family-centered approach to extend coverage and scope of services for children and adolescents with mental health needs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","volume":"36 1","pages":"21-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/99/JCAP-36-21.PMC10087945.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcap.12392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Problem

Many states cover mental health home and community-based services (HCBS) for youth through 1915(c) Medicaid HCBS waivers that allow states to waive certain Medicaid eligibility criteria and define high-risk populations based on age, medical condition(s), and disability status. We sought to evaluate how States are covering children and adolescents with mental health needs through 1915(c) waivers compared to other youth waiver populations.

Methods

Data elements were extracted from Medicaid 1915(c) approved waivers applications for all included waivers targeting any pediatric age range through October 31, 2018. Normalization criteria were developed and an aggregate overall coverage score and level of funding per person per waiver were calculated for each waiver.

Findings

One hundred and forty-two waivers across 45 states were included in this analysis. Even though there was uniformity in the Medicaid applications, there was great heterogeneity in how waiver eligibility, transition plans, services covered, and wait lists were defined across group classifications. Those with mental health needs (termed serious emotional disturbance) represented 5% of waivers with the least annual funding per person per waiver.

Conclusions

We recommend greater links between public policy, infrastructure, health care providers, and a family-centered approach to extend coverage and scope of services for children and adolescents with mental health needs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过家庭和社区医疗补助豁免,儿童和青少年的心理健康服务覆盖面滞后
到1915年,许多州为青少年提供心理健康家庭和社区服务(HCBS) (c)医疗补助HCBS豁免,允许各州放弃某些医疗补助资格标准,并根据年龄、医疗状况和残疾状况定义高风险人群。我们试图评估与其他青少年豁免人群相比,各国在1915年(c)豁免期间是如何覆盖有心理健康需求的儿童和青少年的。方法从Medicaid 1915(c)批准的豁免申请中提取数据元素,包括截至2018年10月31日的所有儿童年龄段的豁免申请。制定了标准化标准,并计算了每次豁免的总覆盖范围得分和每个人每次豁免的供资水平。这项分析包括了45个州的142个豁免。尽管在医疗补助申请中存在一致性,但在豁免资格、过渡计划、服务覆盖范围和等待名单的定义上存在很大的差异。有精神健康需要(称为严重情绪障碍)的人占豁免人数的5%,每人每年获得的资助最少。我们建议加强公共政策、基础设施、卫生保健提供者和以家庭为中心的方法之间的联系,以扩大有心理健康需求的儿童和青少年的服务覆盖范围和范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing (JCAPN) is the only nursing journal to focus exclusively on issues of child and adolescent mental health around the world. As a primary resource for nurses and other healthcare professionals in clinical practice, educator roles, and those conducting research in mental health and psychiatric care, the journal includes peer-reviewed, original articles from a wide range of contributors in a broad variety of settings.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Wildfires on the Mental and Physical Health of School-Age Children in North America: A Scoping Review The Relationship Between Social Media Addiction and Perceived Stress in Adolescents Assessment of Internet and Social Media Addiction Levels in Adolescents Aged 12-18 Years by Nurses: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Calm Before the Storm: Support of Pain and Anxiety Reduction Strategies for the Pediatric Patient. Psychoses in Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Report and Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1