An antidote to what's ailing healthcare workers: a new (old) way of relational leadership.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Leadership in Health Services Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1108/LHS-08-2022-0091
Brian Park, Anaïs Tuepker, Cirila Estela Vasquez Guzman, Samuel Edwards, Elaine Waller Uchison, Cynthia Taylor, M Patrice Eiff
{"title":"An antidote to what's ailing healthcare workers: a new (old) way of relational leadership.","authors":"Brian Park,&nbsp;Anaïs Tuepker,&nbsp;Cirila Estela Vasquez Guzman,&nbsp;Samuel Edwards,&nbsp;Elaine Waller Uchison,&nbsp;Cynthia Taylor,&nbsp;M Patrice Eiff","doi":"10.1108/LHS-08-2022-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study's mixed-methods evaluation was to examine the ways in which a relational leadership development intervention enhanced participants' abilities to apply relationship-oriented skills on their teams.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The authors evaluated five program cohorts from 2018-2021, involving 127 interprofessional participants. The study's convergent mixed-method approach analyzed post-course surveys for descriptive statistics and interpreted six-month post-course interviews using qualitative conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>All intervention features were rated as at least moderately impactful by at least 83% of participants. The sense of community, as well as psychological safety and trust created, were rated as impactful features of the course by at least 94% of participants. At six months post-intervention, participants identified benefits of greater self-awareness, deeper understanding of others and increased confidence in supporting others, building relationships and making positive changes on their teams.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Relational leadership interventions may support participant skills for building connections, supporting others and optimizing teamwork. The high rate of skill application at six months post-course suggests that relational leadership development can be effective and sustainable in healthcare. As the COVID-19 pandemic and systemic crises continue to impact the psychological well-being of healthcare colleagues, relational leadership holds promise to address employee burnout, turnover and isolation on interprofessional care teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":46165,"journal":{"name":"Leadership in Health Services","volume":"ahead-of-print ahead-of-print","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership in Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-08-2022-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study's mixed-methods evaluation was to examine the ways in which a relational leadership development intervention enhanced participants' abilities to apply relationship-oriented skills on their teams.

Design/methodology/approach: The authors evaluated five program cohorts from 2018-2021, involving 127 interprofessional participants. The study's convergent mixed-method approach analyzed post-course surveys for descriptive statistics and interpreted six-month post-course interviews using qualitative conventional content analysis.

Findings: All intervention features were rated as at least moderately impactful by at least 83% of participants. The sense of community, as well as psychological safety and trust created, were rated as impactful features of the course by at least 94% of participants. At six months post-intervention, participants identified benefits of greater self-awareness, deeper understanding of others and increased confidence in supporting others, building relationships and making positive changes on their teams.

Originality/value: Relational leadership interventions may support participant skills for building connections, supporting others and optimizing teamwork. The high rate of skill application at six months post-course suggests that relational leadership development can be effective and sustainable in healthcare. As the COVID-19 pandemic and systemic crises continue to impact the psychological well-being of healthcare colleagues, relational leadership holds promise to address employee burnout, turnover and isolation on interprofessional care teams.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决医疗工作者问题的一剂良药:一种新的(旧的)关系领导方式。
目的:本研究的混合方法评估的目的是检验关系型领导发展干预提高参与者在其团队中应用关系导向技能的能力的方式。设计/方法/方法:作者评估了2018-2021年的五个项目队列,涉及127名跨专业参与者。该研究的融合混合方法分析了课程后调查的描述性统计数据,并使用定性传统内容分析解释了六个月的课程后访谈。结果:至少83%的参与者认为所有干预特征至少具有中等影响。至少94%的参与者认为,社区意识、心理安全感和信任感是该课程的重要特征。在干预六个月后,参与者发现了更强的自我意识、更深入地了解他人、在支持他人、建立关系和在团队中做出积极改变方面增强信心的好处。原创性/价值:关系领导干预可能支持参与者建立联系、支持他人和优化团队合作的技能。课程结束后6个月的高技能应用率表明,关系领导力发展在医疗保健领域是有效和可持续的。随着COVID-19大流行和系统性危机继续影响医疗保健同事的心理健康,关系领导有望解决跨专业护理团队中的员工倦怠、离职和孤立问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Leadership in Health Services
Leadership in Health Services HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Seeking consensus on physician leadership development in rural and remote Indonesian primary care settings: a Delphi study. Contexts and complexities: a realist evaluation of integrated care system leadership. Ethical leadership in health-care organizations - a scoping review. Leadership in federally qualified health centers: examining recruitment and retention in rural Oklahoma. A case study of a pilot leadership skills program to clarify professional fulfillment sources for academic physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1