Second-to-Second Affective Responses to Images Correspond With Affective Reactivity, Variability, and Instability in Daily Life.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Experimental psychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000564
Robert J Klein, Russell Rapaport, Joseph A Gyorda, Nicholas C Jacobson, Michael D Robinson
{"title":"Second-to-Second Affective Responses to Images Correspond With Affective Reactivity, Variability, and Instability in Daily Life.","authors":"Robert J Klein,&nbsp;Russell Rapaport,&nbsp;Joseph A Gyorda,&nbsp;Nicholas C Jacobson,&nbsp;Michael D Robinson","doi":"10.1027/1618-3169/a000564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> Two distinct literatures have evolved to study within-person changes in affect over time. One literature has examined affect dynamics with millisecond-level resolution under controlled laboratory conditions, and the second literature has captured affective dynamics across much longer timescales (e.g., hours or days) within the relatively uncontrolled but more ecologically valid conditions of daily life. Despite the importance of linking these literatures, very little research has been done so far. In the laboratory, peak affect intensities and reaction durations were quantified using a paradigm that captures second-to-second changes in subjective affect elicited by provocative images. In two studies, analyses attempted to link these micro-dynamic indexes to fluctuations in daily affect ratings collected via daily protocols up to 4 weeks later. Although peak intensity and reaction duration scores from the laboratory did not consistently relate to daily scores pertaining to affect variability or instability, the total magnitude of changes in affect following images did display relationships of this type. In addition, higher peaks in the laboratory predicted larger intensity reactions to salient daily events. Together, the studies provide insights into the mechanisms through which correspondences and noncorrespondences between laboratory reactivity indices and daily affect dynamic measures can be expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":12173,"journal":{"name":"Experimental psychology","volume":"70 1","pages":"14-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two distinct literatures have evolved to study within-person changes in affect over time. One literature has examined affect dynamics with millisecond-level resolution under controlled laboratory conditions, and the second literature has captured affective dynamics across much longer timescales (e.g., hours or days) within the relatively uncontrolled but more ecologically valid conditions of daily life. Despite the importance of linking these literatures, very little research has been done so far. In the laboratory, peak affect intensities and reaction durations were quantified using a paradigm that captures second-to-second changes in subjective affect elicited by provocative images. In two studies, analyses attempted to link these micro-dynamic indexes to fluctuations in daily affect ratings collected via daily protocols up to 4 weeks later. Although peak intensity and reaction duration scores from the laboratory did not consistently relate to daily scores pertaining to affect variability or instability, the total magnitude of changes in affect following images did display relationships of this type. In addition, higher peaks in the laboratory predicted larger intensity reactions to salient daily events. Together, the studies provide insights into the mechanisms through which correspondences and noncorrespondences between laboratory reactivity indices and daily affect dynamic measures can be expected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对图像的秒对秒情感反应与日常生活中的情感反应性、可变性和不稳定性相对应。
两种不同的文献已经发展到研究人的影响随时间的变化。一篇文献在受控的实验室条件下以毫秒级的分辨率研究了情感动态,第二篇文献在相对不受控制但更生态有效的日常生活条件下捕获了更长的时间尺度(例如,小时或天)的情感动态。尽管将这些文献联系起来很重要,但迄今为止所做的研究很少。在实验室中,使用一种范式来量化峰值影响强度和反应持续时间,该范式捕捉由挑衅性图像引起的主观影响的秒对秒变化。在两项研究中,分析试图将这些微动态指数与4周后通过每日协议收集的每日影响评级的波动联系起来。尽管来自实验室的峰值强度和反应持续时间得分与与影响可变性或不稳定性相关的日常得分并不一致,但以下图像中影响变化的总幅度确实显示了这种类型的关系。此外,实验室中较高的峰值预示着对重大日常事件的更强烈反应。总之,这些研究提供了对实验室反应性指数与日常影响动态测量之间对应和不对应的机制的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental psychology
Experimental psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: As its name implies, Experimental Psychology (ISSN 1618-3169) publishes innovative, original, high-quality experimental research in psychology — quickly! It aims to provide a particularly fast outlet for such research, relying heavily on electronic exchange of information which begins with the electronic submission of manuscripts, and continues throughout the entire review and production process. The scope of the journal is defined by the experimental method, and so papers based on experiments from all areas of psychology are published. In addition to research articles, Experimental Psychology includes occasional theoretical and review articles.
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Study on Self-Other Intertemporal Choice Between Hearing-Impaired and Normal Children. False Memories of Familiar Faces. Correction to Wiradhany et al., 2024. The Interaction Between the Production Effect and Serial Position in Recognition and Recall. Production and Preschoolers: Is There a Benefit and Do They Know?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1