Seguridad y calidad de vida de los donadores renales. Comparación entre dos técnicas.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Cirugia Y Cirujanos Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24875/CIRU.21000699
Estephanía Navarro-Del Río, Alejandro Lugo-Baruqui, Rodrigo Prieto-Aldape, Concepción Oseguera-Vizcaíno, Marco A Covarrubias-Velasco
{"title":"Seguridad y calidad de vida de los donadores renales. Comparación entre dos técnicas.","authors":"Estephanía Navarro-Del Río,&nbsp;Alejandro Lugo-Baruqui,&nbsp;Rodrigo Prieto-Aldape,&nbsp;Concepción Oseguera-Vizcaíno,&nbsp;Marco A Covarrubias-Velasco","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.21000699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently there are no studies that determine the safety and quality of life of kidney donors in Mexico.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the safety of being a kidney donor and the quality of life, comparing the open approach with hand-assisted laparoscopic technique.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Observational, cross-sectional, analytical study of the kidney donors in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018, in two groups: open technique and hand-assisted laparoscopic. To determine safety, the Clavien-Dindo scale and transoperative bleeding were used, and the SF-36 health-related quality of life questionnaire was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are no reports of peri-operative complications in any type of approach. All the patients obtained a grade I in the Clavien-Dindo scale. When the difference in the score of the SF-36 health-related quality of life questionnaire in kidney donor patients with hand-assisted laparoscopic surgical approach versus open approach was compared, a difference between both means of 14.05 was obtained, with p < 0.0001 in favor of the hand-assisted approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Being a kidney donor is safe and the approach that we recommend is hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50990,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","volume":"91 1","pages":"58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Y Cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.21000699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently there are no studies that determine the safety and quality of life of kidney donors in Mexico.

Objective: To determine the safety of being a kidney donor and the quality of life, comparing the open approach with hand-assisted laparoscopic technique.

Method: Observational, cross-sectional, analytical study of the kidney donors in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018, in two groups: open technique and hand-assisted laparoscopic. To determine safety, the Clavien-Dindo scale and transoperative bleeding were used, and the SF-36 health-related quality of life questionnaire was applied.

Results: There are no reports of peri-operative complications in any type of approach. All the patients obtained a grade I in the Clavien-Dindo scale. When the difference in the score of the SF-36 health-related quality of life questionnaire in kidney donor patients with hand-assisted laparoscopic surgical approach versus open approach was compared, a difference between both means of 14.05 was obtained, with p < 0.0001 in favor of the hand-assisted approach.

Conclusions: Being a kidney donor is safe and the approach that we recommend is hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾供体的安全性和生活质量。两种技术的比较。
背景:目前在墨西哥没有研究确定肾脏供者的安全性和生活质量。目的:比较开放入路和手助腹腔镜技术对供肾者的安全性和生活质量的影响。方法:对我院2015年1月至2018年12月肾供者进行观察、横断面、分析研究,分为开腹和手助腹腔镜两组。为了确定安全性,采用Clavien-Dindo量表和术中出血,并采用SF-36健康相关生活质量问卷。结果:所有入路均无围手术期并发症的报道。所有患者的Clavien-Dindo评分均为I级。比较手辅助腹腔镜手术入路与开放入路肾供患者SF-36健康相关生活质量问卷得分的差异,两种方法的均值差异为14.05,p < 0.0001,手辅助入路优于开放入路。结论:作为肾脏供者是安全的,我们推荐的方法是手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Y Cirujanos
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cirugía y Cirujanoses exponente del desarrollo académico, científico, médico, quirúrgico y tecnológico en materia de salud en México y en el ámbito internacional. Es una revista bimestral, open access, revisada por pares, que publica en español y en inglés (traducido sin coste para los autores) artículos científicos originales, casos clínicos, artículos de revisión de interés general y cartas al editor. Los artículos se seleccionan y publican siguiendo un riguroso análisis, de acuerdo con los estándares internacionalmente aceptados. Sus espacios están abiertos a los académicos, así como a todo miembro de la comunidad médica que manifieste interés por utilizar este foro para publicar sus trabajos.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes and radiological assessment of vascular anatomy in patients who underwent D3 left hemicolectomy. A model to determine factors influencing intraoperative complications in sleeve gastrectomy. [Extremity soft tissue sarcoma: does surgical margin impact survival?] Relación preoperatoria de neutrófilos a proteína C reactiva como predictor de complicaciones posoperatorias del cáncer de pancreas ¿La vía de señalización de sonic hedgehog desempeña un papel en el mecanismo antirreflujo de la vejiga en los niños?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1