[Socio-labor, health, and organizational factors as predictors of perceived high mental load in healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.23938/ASSN.1024
Noelia Espinoza Aguilera, Carolina Luengo Martínez
{"title":"[Socio-labor, health, and organizational factors as predictors of perceived high mental load in healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic].","authors":"Noelia Espinoza Aguilera,&nbsp;Carolina Luengo Martínez","doi":"10.23938/ASSN.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care personnel providing direct care to COVID-19 patients may perceive high mental load. In this study, we aimed to determine the mental workload perceived by the workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship with different variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study carried out in Chile that included 411 health care professionals. The following data were collected by means of an on-line questionnaire: sociodemographic, work-related, health, and psychological mediators and perception of the organizational conditions. The Subjective Mental Workload Scale (SCAM) -a 1 to 5 rating instrument- was applied. Scores >3 indicated high perceived mental load. We determined the independent predictors of perceived high mental load.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health care workers perceived medium-high mental load, 3.69 (IQR = 3.35-4.05); 78.4% of these professionals perceived high mental load. Several variables, mainly related to the organizational conditions of their job, acted as independent predictors for high mental load: being a nurse, having been in the job <6 years, had been working in hospital care, had had symptoms of stress and inadequate sleep, having a low perception regarding access to personal protection equipment and psychological support at their work site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, health care workers perceive high mental burden, mainly associated to the organizational conditions of their job.</p>","PeriodicalId":7775,"journal":{"name":"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/52/3d/assn-45-03-e1024.PMC10065042.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Health care personnel providing direct care to COVID-19 patients may perceive high mental load. In this study, we aimed to determine the mental workload perceived by the workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship with different variables.

Methods: Cross-sectional study carried out in Chile that included 411 health care professionals. The following data were collected by means of an on-line questionnaire: sociodemographic, work-related, health, and psychological mediators and perception of the organizational conditions. The Subjective Mental Workload Scale (SCAM) -a 1 to 5 rating instrument- was applied. Scores >3 indicated high perceived mental load. We determined the independent predictors of perceived high mental load.

Results: Health care workers perceived medium-high mental load, 3.69 (IQR = 3.35-4.05); 78.4% of these professionals perceived high mental load. Several variables, mainly related to the organizational conditions of their job, acted as independent predictors for high mental load: being a nurse, having been in the job <6 years, had been working in hospital care, had had symptoms of stress and inadequate sleep, having a low perception regarding access to personal protection equipment and psychological support at their work site.

Conclusion: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, health care workers perceive high mental burden, mainly associated to the organizational conditions of their job.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[社会劳动、健康和组织因素作为COVID-19大流行期间卫生保健人员感知高精神负荷的预测因素]。
背景:为COVID-19患者提供直接护理的卫生保健人员可能会感到高精神负荷。在本研究中,我们旨在确定COVID-19大流行期间工人感知的心理工作量及其与不同变量的关系。方法:在智利进行横断面研究,包括411名卫生保健专业人员。通过在线问卷收集了以下数据:社会人口、工作相关、健康和心理因素以及对组织条件的感知。采用主观心理负荷量表(SCAM) - 1 - 5评分工具。得分>3分表示认知心理负荷高。我们确定了感知高心理负荷的独立预测因子。结果:医护人员感知中-高心理负荷,3.69 (IQR = 3.35 ~ 4.05);78.4%的人认为心理负荷高。结论:在新冠肺炎疫情大流行背景下,医护人员心理负担较高,主要与其工作组织条件有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra
Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es una revista de contenido médico sanitario de carácter generalista. En ella tienen cabida artículos referidos a temas de salud/enfermedad en general, salud pública, administración y gestión sanitaria y Atención Primaria de salud.
期刊最新文献
Bilateral subgaleal hematoma after a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an uncommon complication. Psychometric analysis of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) and determinants of psychopathology in two outpatient clinics in Navarre (Spain). Effect of mouthwashes on the microhardness of aesthetic composite restorative materials. [Prevalence of dental and mucosal lesions among the pediatric population who attended the emergency department of a general hospital]. [Breastfeeding and rooming-in in the management of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Scoping review].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1