Ethical Criteria for Improved Human Subject Protections in Phase I Healthy Volunteer Trials

Q2 Social Sciences Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1002/eahr.500139
Rebecca L. Walker, Douglas MacKay, Margaret Waltz, Anne D. Lyerly, Jill A. Fisher
{"title":"Ethical Criteria for Improved Human Subject Protections in Phase I Healthy Volunteer Trials","authors":"Rebecca L. Walker,&nbsp;Douglas MacKay,&nbsp;Margaret Waltz,&nbsp;Anne D. Lyerly,&nbsp;Jill A. Fisher","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Phase I healthy volunteer trials test the safety and tolerability of investigational pharmaceuticals. In them, participants are exposed to study-drug risks without the possibility of direct medical benefit and typically must spend days or weeks in a residential research facility. Monetary payments are used to incentivize enrollment and compensate participants for their time. Together, these features of phase I healthy volunteer trials create a research context that differs markedly from most other clinical research, including by enrolling disproportionate numbers of economically disadvantaged people of color as participants. Due to these unique trial features and participation patterns, traditional biomedical research oversight offers inadequate ethical and policy guidance for phase I healthy volunteer research. This article details five ethical criteria crafted to be responsive to the particularities of this type of research: translational science value, fair opportunity and burden sharing, fair compensation for service, experiential welfare, and enhanced voice and recourse.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 5","pages":"2-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931499/pdf/nihms-1870071.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phase I healthy volunteer trials test the safety and tolerability of investigational pharmaceuticals. In them, participants are exposed to study-drug risks without the possibility of direct medical benefit and typically must spend days or weeks in a residential research facility. Monetary payments are used to incentivize enrollment and compensate participants for their time. Together, these features of phase I healthy volunteer trials create a research context that differs markedly from most other clinical research, including by enrolling disproportionate numbers of economically disadvantaged people of color as participants. Due to these unique trial features and participation patterns, traditional biomedical research oversight offers inadequate ethical and policy guidance for phase I healthy volunteer research. This article details five ethical criteria crafted to be responsive to the particularities of this type of research: translational science value, fair opportunity and burden sharing, fair compensation for service, experiential welfare, and enhanced voice and recourse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
I期健康志愿者试验中改进人体受试者保护的伦理标准
第一阶段健康志愿者试验测试研究药物的安全性和耐受性。在这些项目中,参与者暴露在研究药物的风险中,而不可能获得直接的医疗益处,而且通常必须在住宅研究设施中呆上几天或几周。货币支付用于激励注册和补偿参与者的时间。总之,第一阶段健康志愿者试验的这些特征创造了一个与大多数其他临床研究明显不同的研究背景,包括招募不成比例的经济弱势有色人种作为参与者。由于这些独特的试验特点和参与模式,传统的生物医学研究监督对第一阶段健康志愿者研究提供的伦理和政策指导不足。本文详细介绍了针对这类研究的特殊性而精心设计的五个伦理标准:转化科学价值、公平的机会和负担分担、公平的服务补偿、体验福利以及增强的发言权和追索权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Prospect of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Ethics Review Ethical Issues Faced by Data Monitoring Committees: Results from an Exploratory Qualitative Study The Ethical Case for Decentralized Clinical Trials The European Health Data Space as a Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1