Qualitative Perceptions of an Anticipated Fresh Food Prescription Program.

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Behavior and Policy Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14485/hbpr.9.1.5
Sharon Thomson, Judy Ugwuegbu, Kimberly Montez, Sarah Langdon, Scott Best, Daniel Sostaita, Michelle Franklin, Rachel Zimmer
{"title":"Qualitative Perceptions of an Anticipated Fresh Food Prescription Program.","authors":"Sharon Thomson,&nbsp;Judy Ugwuegbu,&nbsp;Kimberly Montez,&nbsp;Sarah Langdon,&nbsp;Scott Best,&nbsp;Daniel Sostaita,&nbsp;Michelle Franklin,&nbsp;Rachel Zimmer","doi":"10.14485/hbpr.9.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Food insecurity (FI) is a growing public health problem. Produce prescriptions are known to improve healthy eating and decrease FI; however, few studies have incorporated community voice prior to its implementation. In this study, we aimed to elicit perspectives of individuals at risk for FI and the potential impact of a fresh food prescription (FFRx) program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted this qualitative descriptive study through an academic medical center in collaboration with community partners. We conducted focus groups involving Latinx (N = 16) and African-American (N = 8) adults in community settings. Data were interpreted using an inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three overarching themes emerged: (1) fresh food accessibility was limited by cost, household size, and transportation but enhanced by food pantries, budgeting, and education; (2) cooking behaviors were curbed by time constraints and unfamiliarity but propagated by passion, traditions, and communal practices; and (3) health and wellness deterrents included unhealthy diets driven by cultural and familial norms; however, weight loss and awareness of comorbidities were positive motivators. Participants shared their preference for local produce and cooking classes as components of a FFRx program while raising concerns about low participation due to the stigma of receiving aid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings illuminated interest in engaging in a FFRx program and learning ways to prepare healthy foods. A program distributing fresh produce and healthy lifestyle education could close gaps identified in African-American and Latinx communities at risk for FI.</p>","PeriodicalId":44486,"journal":{"name":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"670-682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364949/pdf/nihms-1827260.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14485/hbpr.9.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Food insecurity (FI) is a growing public health problem. Produce prescriptions are known to improve healthy eating and decrease FI; however, few studies have incorporated community voice prior to its implementation. In this study, we aimed to elicit perspectives of individuals at risk for FI and the potential impact of a fresh food prescription (FFRx) program.

Methods: We conducted this qualitative descriptive study through an academic medical center in collaboration with community partners. We conducted focus groups involving Latinx (N = 16) and African-American (N = 8) adults in community settings. Data were interpreted using an inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Three overarching themes emerged: (1) fresh food accessibility was limited by cost, household size, and transportation but enhanced by food pantries, budgeting, and education; (2) cooking behaviors were curbed by time constraints and unfamiliarity but propagated by passion, traditions, and communal practices; and (3) health and wellness deterrents included unhealthy diets driven by cultural and familial norms; however, weight loss and awareness of comorbidities were positive motivators. Participants shared their preference for local produce and cooking classes as components of a FFRx program while raising concerns about low participation due to the stigma of receiving aid.

Conclusions: Our findings illuminated interest in engaging in a FFRx program and learning ways to prepare healthy foods. A program distributing fresh produce and healthy lifestyle education could close gaps identified in African-American and Latinx communities at risk for FI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预期新鲜食品处方计划的定性认知。
目的:粮食不安全(FI)是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。已知生产处方可以改善健康饮食和降低FI;然而,很少有研究在实施之前纳入社区意见。在这项研究中,我们旨在引出有FI风险的个体的观点和新鲜食品处方(FFRx)计划的潜在影响。方法:我们通过学术医疗中心与社区伙伴合作进行了定性描述性研究。我们在社区环境中进行了涉及拉丁裔(N = 16)和非裔美国人(N = 8)成年人的焦点小组。使用归纳专题分析对数据进行解释。结果表明:(1)新鲜食品可及性受成本、家庭规模和交通的限制,但受食品储藏室、预算和教育的影响;(2)烹饪行为受到时间限制和不熟悉程度的限制,但受到激情、传统和社区实践的传播;(3)由文化和家庭规范驱动的不健康饮食;然而,体重减轻和对合并症的认识是积极的激励因素。参与者分享了他们对当地农产品和烹饪课程作为FFRx项目组成部分的偏好,同时也提出了由于接受援助的耻辱而导致参与率低的担忧。结论:我们的研究结果阐明了参与FFRx计划和学习如何准备健康食品的兴趣。一项分配新鲜农产品和健康生活方式教育的计划可以缩小非裔美国人和拉丁裔社区中存在FI风险的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Behavior and Policy Review
Health Behavior and Policy Review PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Helping Everyone Achieve a LifeTime of Health - Future Addiction Scientist Training Program Outcomes. Gender-related sociocultural factors impacting physical activity among female South Asians: A scoping review. Internalized Homonegativity is Indirectly Associated with Smoking Status through Somatic Anxiety. Trauma Informed Care Can Enhance Whole Person Care to Meet the Quadruple Aim Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening among Sub-Saharan African Immigrant Women in the United States: A Qualitative Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1