Evaluating the Performance of a Commercially Available Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automated Detection of Pulmonary Embolism on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019

Karim A. Zaazoue MD , Mathew R. McCann MD , Ahmed K. Ahmed MD, MSc , Isabel O. Cortopassi MD , Young M. Erben MD , Brent P. Little MD , Justin T. Stowell MD , Beau B. Toskich MD , Charles A. Ritchie MD
{"title":"Evaluating the Performance of a Commercially Available Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automated Detection of Pulmonary Embolism on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019","authors":"Karim A. Zaazoue MD ,&nbsp;Mathew R. McCann MD ,&nbsp;Ahmed K. Ahmed MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Isabel O. Cortopassi MD ,&nbsp;Young M. Erben MD ,&nbsp;Brent P. Little MD ,&nbsp;Justin T. Stowell MD ,&nbsp;Beau B. Toskich MD ,&nbsp;Charles A. Ritchie MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the performance of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Retrospective analysis was performed of all contrast-enhanced chest CT scans of patients admitted for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. Based on the original radiology reports, all PE-positive examinations were included (n=527). Using a reversed-flow single-gate diagnostic accuracy case-control model, a randomly selected cohort of PE-negative examinations (n=977) was included. Pulmonary parenchymal disease severity was assessed for all the included studies using a semiquantitative system, the total severity score. All included CT scans were sent for interpretation by the commercially available AI algorithm, Aidoc. Discrepancies between AI and original radiology reports were resolved by 3 blinded radiologists, who rendered a final determination of indeterminate, positive, or negative.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 78 studies were found to be discrepant, of which 13 (16.6%) were deemed indeterminate by readers and were excluded. The sensitivity and specificity of AI were 93.2% (95% CI, 90.6%-95.2%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 98.9%-99.9%), respectively. The accuracy of AI for all total severity score groups (mild, moderate, and severe) was high (98.4%, 96.7%, and 97.2%, respectively). Artificial intelligence was more accurate in PE detection on CT pulmonary angiography scans than on contrast-enhanced CT scans (<em>P</em>&lt;.001), with an optimal Hounsfield unit of 362 (<em>P</em>=.048).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The AI algorithm demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for PE on contrast-enhanced CT scans in patients with COVID-19 regardless of parenchymal disease. Accuracy was significantly affected by the mean attenuation of the pulmonary vasculature. How this affects the legitimacy of the binary outcomes reported by AI is not yet known.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9995315/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the performance of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans in patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Patients and Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed of all contrast-enhanced chest CT scans of patients admitted for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. Based on the original radiology reports, all PE-positive examinations were included (n=527). Using a reversed-flow single-gate diagnostic accuracy case-control model, a randomly selected cohort of PE-negative examinations (n=977) was included. Pulmonary parenchymal disease severity was assessed for all the included studies using a semiquantitative system, the total severity score. All included CT scans were sent for interpretation by the commercially available AI algorithm, Aidoc. Discrepancies between AI and original radiology reports were resolved by 3 blinded radiologists, who rendered a final determination of indeterminate, positive, or negative.

Results

A total of 78 studies were found to be discrepant, of which 13 (16.6%) were deemed indeterminate by readers and were excluded. The sensitivity and specificity of AI were 93.2% (95% CI, 90.6%-95.2%) and 99.6% (95% CI, 98.9%-99.9%), respectively. The accuracy of AI for all total severity score groups (mild, moderate, and severe) was high (98.4%, 96.7%, and 97.2%, respectively). Artificial intelligence was more accurate in PE detection on CT pulmonary angiography scans than on contrast-enhanced CT scans (P<.001), with an optimal Hounsfield unit of 362 (P=.048).

Conclusion

The AI algorithm demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for PE on contrast-enhanced CT scans in patients with COVID-19 regardless of parenchymal disease. Accuracy was significantly affected by the mean attenuation of the pulmonary vasculature. How this affects the legitimacy of the binary outcomes reported by AI is not yet known.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估2019冠状病毒病患者对比增强计算机断层扫描和计算机断层肺血管造影自动检测肺栓塞的市售人工智能算法的性能
目的探讨一种市售人工智能(AI)算法在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者肺栓塞(PE)的CT扫描检测中的性能。患者和方法回顾性分析2020年3月1日至2021年12月31日收治的所有COVID-19患者的胸部CT增强扫描。根据原始放射学报告,纳入所有pe阳性检查(n=527)。采用反向流动单门诊断准确性病例对照模型,随机选择pe阴性检查队列(n=977)。所有纳入的研究均采用半定量系统评估肺实质疾病严重程度,即总严重程度评分。所有包括的CT扫描都发送给商用人工智能算法Aidoc进行解释。人工智能与原始放射学报告之间的差异由3名盲法放射科医生解决,他们给出了不确定、阳性或阴性的最终决定。结果共发现78篇研究存在差异,其中13篇(16.6%)被读者认为不确定而被排除。AI的敏感性和特异性分别为93.2% (95% CI, 90.6% ~ 95.2%)和99.6% (95% CI, 98.9% ~ 99.9%)。AI对所有严重程度评分组(轻度、中度和重度)的准确率均较高(分别为98.4%、96.7%和97.2%)。人工智能在CT肺血管造影扫描中的PE检测比增强CT扫描更准确(P<.001),最佳Hounsfield单位为362 (P=.048)。结论AI算法对COVID-19患者CT增强扫描PE具有较高的敏感性、特异性和准确性,与实质疾病无关。准确性受到肺血管平均衰减的显著影响。这如何影响人工智能报告的二元结果的合法性尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Prognostic Factors and Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Southeastern United States Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The Diabetes and Endocrinology Example Lifestyle Medicine in Medical Education: Maximizing Impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1