The work of reform: a critical examination of health policy.

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology & Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1080/13648470.2022.2144805
Na'amah Razon, Alissa Bernstein Sideman
{"title":"The work of reform: a critical examination of health policy.","authors":"Na'amah Razon,&nbsp;Alissa Bernstein Sideman","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2022.2144805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anthropologists have critically examined a range of reforms from education and land to finance and health. Yet the predominant way of looking at reforms has been through a lens focused on neoliberal governance. For example, prior studies of health reforms focus on insurance, financing, and access to care. Yet, seeing reform in this way fails to attend to other types of cultural work at play when calling a policy or law a reform. In this paper, we draw on ethnographic research on health policy reforms in Israel and Bolivia to examine the concept of reform and the work it does within national movements. We argue that while the language of reform often signals change or novelty, reforms also carry forward historical continuities and reifications of the past. By delving into the past and its relationship with ongoing health reforms, we attend to how reforms can reinforce and maintain health inequities in some cases, while creating a national language for new possibilities in others. Reform, as we will discuss in this paper, is not only about political ideology, neoliberal governance, or on-the-ground policy implementation, but centrally it is about representations of aspirations, and about crafting relationships between past, present, and future.</p>","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":"29 4","pages":"414-429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/6e/nihms-1883716.PMC10075328.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2022.2144805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropologists have critically examined a range of reforms from education and land to finance and health. Yet the predominant way of looking at reforms has been through a lens focused on neoliberal governance. For example, prior studies of health reforms focus on insurance, financing, and access to care. Yet, seeing reform in this way fails to attend to other types of cultural work at play when calling a policy or law a reform. In this paper, we draw on ethnographic research on health policy reforms in Israel and Bolivia to examine the concept of reform and the work it does within national movements. We argue that while the language of reform often signals change or novelty, reforms also carry forward historical continuities and reifications of the past. By delving into the past and its relationship with ongoing health reforms, we attend to how reforms can reinforce and maintain health inequities in some cases, while creating a national language for new possibilities in others. Reform, as we will discuss in this paper, is not only about political ideology, neoliberal governance, or on-the-ground policy implementation, but centrally it is about representations of aspirations, and about crafting relationships between past, present, and future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改革工作:对卫生政策的批判性审查。
人类学家对从教育和土地到财政和卫生的一系列改革进行了批判性的研究。然而,看待改革的主要方式是通过聚焦于新自由主义治理的镜头。例如,先前对医疗改革的研究侧重于保险、融资和获得医疗服务。但是,这样看待改革,在把一项政策或法律称为改革时,却没有考虑到其他方面的文化工作。在本文中,我们借鉴了以色列和玻利维亚卫生政策改革的民族志研究,以研究改革的概念及其在民族运动中的工作。我们认为,虽然改革的语言往往是变化或新奇的信号,但改革也发扬了历史的连续性和对过去的具体化。通过深入研究过去及其与正在进行的卫生改革的关系,我们关注改革如何在某些情况下加强和维持卫生不平等,同时在其他情况下为新的可能性创造一种国家语言。正如我们将在本文中讨论的那样,改革不仅涉及政治意识形态、新自由主义治理或实地政策实施,而且主要涉及愿望的表达,以及构建过去、现在和未来之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
(In) visibility of health and illness: Instagram as an unregulated public health platform. 'We are not done': reclaiming care after mobile health in Burkina Faso. Digital technologies and the future of health: aspirations, care and data. Phantom data and the potentials of radical caretaking in reproductive health. The insensitivity of 'sensitive care': the bureaucracy of pregnancy tissue disposal in England, UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1