Effect of laser peripheral iridotomy on contrast sensitivity using Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity test.

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158414221078142
Parul Ichhpujani, Sahil Thakur, Tanu Singh, Rohan Bir Singh, Suresh Kumar
{"title":"Effect of laser peripheral iridotomy on contrast sensitivity using Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity test.","authors":"Parul Ichhpujani,&nbsp;Sahil Thakur,&nbsp;Tanu Singh,&nbsp;Rohan Bir Singh,&nbsp;Suresh Kumar","doi":"10.1177/25158414221078142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is the current standard of care for primary angle-closure glaucoma. The existing literature lacks evidence regarding the effects of LPI on contrast sensitivity (CS) after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates central and peripheral CS in patients undergoing LPI using the computer-based, Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pilot, prospective, interventional cohort study including 30 patients of primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) or primary angle closure (PAC) in both eyes. LPI was performed after a detailed history and clinical examination using standard procedure in all eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and CS testing using SPARCS was performed before, 2 weeks and 3 months after LPI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analyses revealed female predominance (66.67%, 20/30); the mean age of enrolled patients was 49.93 ± 10.43 years, and presenting acuity was 0.02 ± 0.06 (Log of Minimum Angle of Resolution [LogMAR]). The mean vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR), mean deviation (MD in dB) and pattern standard deviation (PSD in dB) were 0.34 ± 0.09, -2.36 ± 1.72 and 2.34 ± 0.81, respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease between the pre- (15.17 ± 3.83 mmHg) and 2 weeks post-LPI (11.70 ± 1.53 mmHg) IOP (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, CS in the pre- (73.47 ± 9.88) and 3 months post-LPI (75.20 ± 11.98) SPARCS scores did not reveal any statistical difference. The group-wise analysis showed a similar trend between PAC and PACS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LPI does not affect central as well as peripheral CS assessment in patients with the primary angle-closure disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"14 ","pages":"25158414221078142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/b8/10.1177_25158414221078142.PMC8894935.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414221078142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is the current standard of care for primary angle-closure glaucoma. The existing literature lacks evidence regarding the effects of LPI on contrast sensitivity (CS) after the procedure.

Objective: This study evaluates central and peripheral CS in patients undergoing LPI using the computer-based, Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) test.

Methods: We performed a pilot, prospective, interventional cohort study including 30 patients of primary angle-closure suspect (PACS) or primary angle closure (PAC) in both eyes. LPI was performed after a detailed history and clinical examination using standard procedure in all eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and CS testing using SPARCS was performed before, 2 weeks and 3 months after LPI.

Results: Data analyses revealed female predominance (66.67%, 20/30); the mean age of enrolled patients was 49.93 ± 10.43 years, and presenting acuity was 0.02 ± 0.06 (Log of Minimum Angle of Resolution [LogMAR]). The mean vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR), mean deviation (MD in dB) and pattern standard deviation (PSD in dB) were 0.34 ± 0.09, -2.36 ± 1.72 and 2.34 ± 0.81, respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease between the pre- (15.17 ± 3.83 mmHg) and 2 weeks post-LPI (11.70 ± 1.53 mmHg) IOP (p < 0.001). However, CS in the pre- (73.47 ± 9.88) and 3 months post-LPI (75.20 ± 11.98) SPARCS scores did not reveal any statistical difference. The group-wise analysis showed a similar trend between PAC and PACS patients.

Conclusion: LPI does not affect central as well as peripheral CS assessment in patients with the primary angle-closure disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光周围虹膜切开术对对比敏感度的影响
背景:激光周围虹膜切开术(LPI)是目前治疗原发性闭角型青光眼的标准方法。现有文献缺乏关于LPI对术后对比敏感度(CS)影响的证据。目的:本研究使用基于计算机的Spaeth/Richman对比灵敏度(SPARCS)测试评估LPI患者的中枢和外周CS。方法:我们对30例双眼原发性闭角疑似(PACS)或原发性闭角(PAC)患者进行了一项前瞻性、干预性队列研究。在详细的病史和临床检查后,采用全眼标准程序进行LPI。分别于LPI术前、术后2周和3个月采用SPARCS法测定眼压(IOP)和CS。结果:资料分析显示女性优势(66.67%,20/30);入组患者的平均年龄为49.93±10.43岁,视力为0.02±0.06(最小分辨角对数[LogMAR])。平均垂直杯盘比(VCDR)、平均偏差(MD, dB)和模式标准差(PSD, dB)分别为0.34±0.09、-2.36±1.72和2.34±0.81。LPI前(15.17±3.83 mmHg)和LPI后2周(11.70±1.53 mmHg) IOP (p)之间有统计学意义的降低。结论:LPI不影响原发性闭角症患者的中枢和外周CS评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of continuous blanket suture for severe recurrent pterygium with symblepharon. The experiences of visually impaired military veterans with Charles Bonnet syndrome. Are depression, anxiety and loneliness associated with visual hallucinations in younger adults with Charles Bonnet syndrome? Clinical characteristics of allergic conjunctivitis in the Southern region of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Optical coherence tomography angiography to assess for retinal vascular changes in Neuro-Sjögren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1