The intensity of empathy in adolescents treated in a day unit - preliminary reports.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatria polska Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/154985
Renata Modrzejewska, Anna Wasik, Paulina Cofór-Pinkowska, Agnieszka Pac, Marcin Siwek
{"title":"The intensity of empathy in adolescents treated in a day unit - preliminary reports.","authors":"Renata Modrzejewska, Anna Wasik, Paulina Cofór-Pinkowska, Agnieszka Pac, Marcin Siwek","doi":"10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/154985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the pilot study was to compare the level of empathy among adolescents treated in a psychiatric day unit in groups with varied age, gender and type of disorder (conduct and emotional disorders and depressive-anxiety disorders).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was carried out in a group of 117 adolescents (69 girls and 48 boys) aged 13-20, treated in the Clinical Day Unit of the Department of Adult, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the University Hospital in Kraków between 2016-2021. The Davis Empathy Scale and the Cohen Empathy Scale were used for the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Girls scored significantly higher compared to boys on the Cohen and Davis Empathy scales and on the Davis subscale: Personal Distress. Statistically significant interactions were observed for the factors of gender and age, as well as age and disorder type. Older boys had statistically significantly higher scores on the Davis Empathy Scale compared to younger boys, while the reverse pattern was observed for girls (non-significant). Older patients with conduct disorders had significantly lower Cohen's Empathy Scale scores compared to younger patients; the opposite pattern was observed in the group of patients with anxiety-depressive disorders (non-significant).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Girls exhibit higher levels of affective and cognitive empathy than boys. The intensity of empathy increases with age in the group of boys, while for girls the obtained differences are not statistically significant. The intensity of empathy is significantly lower in the group of older adolescents (versus younger) with conduct and emotional disorders. Among depressive-anxiety disorders, the opposite pattern was noted (non-significant). The unique results obtained indicate a different trajectory of empathy development in the group of patients with conduct disorders and with depressive-anxiety disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20863,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria polska","volume":" ","pages":"329-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/154985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the pilot study was to compare the level of empathy among adolescents treated in a psychiatric day unit in groups with varied age, gender and type of disorder (conduct and emotional disorders and depressive-anxiety disorders).

Methods: The study was carried out in a group of 117 adolescents (69 girls and 48 boys) aged 13-20, treated in the Clinical Day Unit of the Department of Adult, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the University Hospital in Kraków between 2016-2021. The Davis Empathy Scale and the Cohen Empathy Scale were used for the study.

Results: Girls scored significantly higher compared to boys on the Cohen and Davis Empathy scales and on the Davis subscale: Personal Distress. Statistically significant interactions were observed for the factors of gender and age, as well as age and disorder type. Older boys had statistically significantly higher scores on the Davis Empathy Scale compared to younger boys, while the reverse pattern was observed for girls (non-significant). Older patients with conduct disorders had significantly lower Cohen's Empathy Scale scores compared to younger patients; the opposite pattern was observed in the group of patients with anxiety-depressive disorders (non-significant).

Conclusions: Girls exhibit higher levels of affective and cognitive empathy than boys. The intensity of empathy increases with age in the group of boys, while for girls the obtained differences are not statistically significant. The intensity of empathy is significantly lower in the group of older adolescents (versus younger) with conduct and emotional disorders. Among depressive-anxiety disorders, the opposite pattern was noted (non-significant). The unique results obtained indicate a different trajectory of empathy development in the group of patients with conduct disorders and with depressive-anxiety disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在日间病房接受治疗的青少年的移情强度--初步报告。
研究目的本试验性研究的目的是比较在精神病日间病房接受治疗的不同年龄、性别和疾病类型(行为和情绪障碍以及抑郁焦虑障碍)青少年群体的移情水平:研究对象是 117 名 13-20 岁的青少年(69 名女孩和 48 名男孩),他们于 2016-2021 年期间在克拉科夫大学医院成人、儿童和青少年精神病学系临床日间病房接受治疗。研究使用了戴维斯移情量表和科恩移情量表:结果:在科恩移情量表和戴维斯移情量表以及戴维斯分量表上,女孩的得分明显高于男孩:个人压力。性别和年龄因素以及年龄和障碍类型因素之间存在统计学意义上的交互作用。在戴维斯移情量表上,年龄较大的男孩的得分明显高于年龄较小的男孩,而女孩的得分则与之相反(不显著)。老年品行障碍患者的科恩移情量表得分明显低于年轻患者;焦虑抑郁障碍患者的情况正好相反(不显著):结论:与男孩相比,女孩表现出更高水平的情感共情和认知共情。结论:女孩的情感共情和认知共情水平高于男孩。男孩的共情强度随着年龄的增长而增加,而女孩的共情强度与男孩的差异在统计学上并不显著。有行为和情绪障碍的高年级青少年(相对于低年级青少年)的移情强度明显较低。在抑郁-焦虑障碍中,情况正好相反(不显著)。这些独特的结果表明,行为障碍患者和抑郁焦虑障碍患者的移情能力发展轨迹不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria polska
Psychiatria polska 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Study directions and development of cognitive theory of depression. Prevalence and determinants of psychotropic medication use in Poland. Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in the treatment of delirium. An outline of savant syndrome. Use of the opioid receptor antagonist - naltrexone in the treatment of non-suicidal self-injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1