Marco Lombardi, Roberta Ortenzi, Jessica Sanna, Martina Pecorari, Maria Chiara Scenti, Cristina Iannini, Brunella Lagrotteria, Cristina Mancini, Giovanna Paoletti, Giuseppe Nicolò
{"title":"[Covid-19 emergency and telemedicine: multifamily psychoeducational intervention in a forensic setting.]","authors":"Marco Lombardi, Roberta Ortenzi, Jessica Sanna, Martina Pecorari, Maria Chiara Scenti, Cristina Iannini, Brunella Lagrotteria, Cristina Mancini, Giovanna Paoletti, Giuseppe Nicolò","doi":"10.1708/4022.39975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to describe remote multifamily psychoeducational intervention led by REMS \"Castore\" team (an Italian health care facility for offenders who suffer from mental disorders and socially dangerous) in ASL Roma 5, a local health authority, during covid-19 emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The applied theoretical models have been the integrated psychoeducational intervention by I. Falloon and the multifamily psychoeducational intervention based on problem solving by F. Veltro. The multifamily psychoeducational intervention was attempted by inpatients' relatives from June to August 2020 with 8 weekly meetings of 90' each led by two psychiatric rehabilitation therapists and healthcare experts. Six families were involved in the study and its members were assessed by questionnaire on family problems, Brief-COPE and general health questionnaire tests. Users were assessed by Level of Expressed Emotion Scale test for their expressed emotion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis highlighted the general low level of subjective and objective burden for family members in association with a high perception of that support provided by REMS. Furthermore, the study has shown those coping approaches oriented to the research of practical solutions, acceptance of events and assertive communication.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The low subjective and objective burden may be attributed to implicit security conditions in REMS and the absence of tasks mainly carried out by experts. Those coping styles oriented to more practical than emotional approaches suggest an emotional hyper control or stigma perception leading to isolation and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multifamily psychoeducational intervention has allowed a trustworthy relationship with REMS. Considering that the families involved in the study have never benefited by other psychoeducational interventions before, their early involvement appears to be a potential tool for preventing and managing crisis as well as minimizing recidivism.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":"58 2","pages":"59-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/4022.39975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The aim is to describe remote multifamily psychoeducational intervention led by REMS "Castore" team (an Italian health care facility for offenders who suffer from mental disorders and socially dangerous) in ASL Roma 5, a local health authority, during covid-19 emergency.
Methods: The applied theoretical models have been the integrated psychoeducational intervention by I. Falloon and the multifamily psychoeducational intervention based on problem solving by F. Veltro. The multifamily psychoeducational intervention was attempted by inpatients' relatives from June to August 2020 with 8 weekly meetings of 90' each led by two psychiatric rehabilitation therapists and healthcare experts. Six families were involved in the study and its members were assessed by questionnaire on family problems, Brief-COPE and general health questionnaire tests. Users were assessed by Level of Expressed Emotion Scale test for their expressed emotion.
Results: Data analysis highlighted the general low level of subjective and objective burden for family members in association with a high perception of that support provided by REMS. Furthermore, the study has shown those coping approaches oriented to the research of practical solutions, acceptance of events and assertive communication.
Discussion: The low subjective and objective burden may be attributed to implicit security conditions in REMS and the absence of tasks mainly carried out by experts. Those coping styles oriented to more practical than emotional approaches suggest an emotional hyper control or stigma perception leading to isolation and loneliness.
Conclusions: The multifamily psychoeducational intervention has allowed a trustworthy relationship with REMS. Considering that the families involved in the study have never benefited by other psychoeducational interventions before, their early involvement appears to be a potential tool for preventing and managing crisis as well as minimizing recidivism.
目的:目的是描述在2019冠状病毒病紧急情况下,由REMS“Castore”团队(意大利一家为患有精神障碍和社会危险的罪犯提供医疗服务的机构)在当地卫生当局ASL Roma 5领导的远程多家庭心理教育干预。方法:应用的理论模型有I. Falloon的综合心理教育干预和F. Veltro的基于问题解决的多家庭心理教育干预。2020年6月至8月,住院患者家属尝试多家庭心理教育干预,每周8次,每次90次,由2名精神康复治疗师和卫生保健专家主持。本研究涉及6个家庭,通过家庭问题问卷、Brief-COPE和一般健康问卷测试对其成员进行评估。通过情绪表达水平量表测试对用户的情绪表达进行评估。结果:数据分析表明,家庭成员的主观和客观负担水平普遍较低,并且对REMS提供的支持有较高的认识。此外,研究还显示了以研究实际解决方案、接受事件和自信沟通为导向的应对方法。讨论:主观和客观负担较低可能是由于REMS的隐性安全条件和缺乏主要由专家进行的任务。这些应对方式倾向于更实际的而不是情绪化的方法,表明情绪上的过度控制或耻辱感会导致孤立和孤独。结论:多家庭心理教育干预与REMS之间存在信任关系。考虑到参与研究的家庭以前从未从其他心理教育干预中受益,他们的早期参与似乎是预防和管理危机以及减少再犯的潜在工具。
期刊介绍:
Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.