Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects between Ultrasound-Guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Patients: A Randomized, Controlled, and Noninferiority Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/8652596
Jin Wang, Xulei Cui, Liying Ren, Xu Li, Yuelun Zhang, Yi Xie, Zhigang Ji, Yuguang Huang
{"title":"Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects between Ultrasound-Guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Patients: A Randomized, Controlled, and Noninferiority Study.","authors":"Jin Wang,&nbsp;Xulei Cui,&nbsp;Liying Ren,&nbsp;Xu Li,&nbsp;Yuelun Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Xie,&nbsp;Zhigang Ji,&nbsp;Yuguang Huang","doi":"10.1155/2023/8652596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, noninferiority study aimed to compare the effects of analgesia and recovery between transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TMQLB) and paravertebral block (PVB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-eight, American Society of Anesthesiologists level I-III patients, who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were randomly allocated to either TMQLB or PVB group (independent variable) in a 1 : 1 ratio. The TMQLB and PVB groups received corresponding regional anesthesia preoperatively with 0.4 ml/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine and follow-up at postoperative 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours. The participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. We hypothesized that the primary outcome, postoperative 48-hour cumulative morphine consumption, in the TMQLB group was not more than 50% of that in the PVB group. Secondary outcomes including pain numerical rating scales (NRS) and postoperative recovery data were dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients in each group completed the study. The postoperative 48-hour cumulative morphine consumption was 10.60 ± 5.28 mg in the TMQLB group and 6.40 ± 3.40 mg in the PVB group. The ratio (TMQLB versus PVB) of postoperative 48-hour morphine consumption was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.13-1.48), indicating a noninferior analgesic effect of TMQLB to PVB. The sensory block range was wider in the TMQLB group than in the PVB group (difference 2 dermatomes, 95% CI 1 to 4 dermatomes, <i>P</i>=0.004). The intraoperative analgesic dose was higher in the TMQLB group than in the PVB group (difference 32 <i>µ</i>g, 95% CI: 3-62 <i>µ</i>g, <i>P</i>=0.03). The postoperative pain NRS at rest and on movement, incidences of side effects, anesthesia-related satisfaction, and quality of recovery scores were similar between the two groups (all <i>P</i>  >  0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The postoperative 48-hour analgesic effect of TMQLB was noninferior to that of PVB in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. This trial is registered with NCT03975296.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2023 ","pages":"8652596"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8652596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, noninferiority study aimed to compare the effects of analgesia and recovery between transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TMQLB) and paravertebral block (PVB).

Methods: Sixty-eight, American Society of Anesthesiologists level I-III patients, who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were randomly allocated to either TMQLB or PVB group (independent variable) in a 1 : 1 ratio. The TMQLB and PVB groups received corresponding regional anesthesia preoperatively with 0.4 ml/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine and follow-up at postoperative 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours. The participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. We hypothesized that the primary outcome, postoperative 48-hour cumulative morphine consumption, in the TMQLB group was not more than 50% of that in the PVB group. Secondary outcomes including pain numerical rating scales (NRS) and postoperative recovery data were dependent variables.

Results: Thirty patients in each group completed the study. The postoperative 48-hour cumulative morphine consumption was 10.60 ± 5.28 mg in the TMQLB group and 6.40 ± 3.40 mg in the PVB group. The ratio (TMQLB versus PVB) of postoperative 48-hour morphine consumption was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.13-1.48), indicating a noninferior analgesic effect of TMQLB to PVB. The sensory block range was wider in the TMQLB group than in the PVB group (difference 2 dermatomes, 95% CI 1 to 4 dermatomes, P=0.004). The intraoperative analgesic dose was higher in the TMQLB group than in the PVB group (difference 32 µg, 95% CI: 3-62 µg, P=0.03). The postoperative pain NRS at rest and on movement, incidences of side effects, anesthesia-related satisfaction, and quality of recovery scores were similar between the two groups (all P  >  0.05).

Conclusions: The postoperative 48-hour analgesic effect of TMQLB was noninferior to that of PVB in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. This trial is registered with NCT03975296.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下经腰方肌阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞在腹腔镜部分肾切除术患者术后镇痛效果的比较:一项随机、对照、非效性研究。
背景:这项前瞻性、随机、双盲、非低效性研究旨在比较经肌腰方肌阻滞(TMQLB)和椎旁阻滞(PVB)在镇痛和恢复方面的效果。方法:68例在北京联合医院行腹腔镜肾部分切除术的美国麻醉师学会I-III级患者按1:1的比例随机分为TMQLB组和PVB组(自变量)。TMQLB组和PVB组术前给予0.5%罗哌卡因0.4 ml/kg相应区域麻醉,术后4、12、24、48小时随访。参与者和结果评估者对分组分配不知情。我们假设TMQLB组的主要结局,术后48小时吗啡累积用量,不超过PVB组的50%。次要结局包括疼痛数值评定量表(NRS)和术后恢复数据是因变量。结果:每组30例患者完成研究。TMQLB组术后48小时吗啡累计用量为10.60±5.28 mg, PVB组术后48小时吗啡累计用量为6.40±3.40 mg。术后48小时吗啡用量之比(TMQLB与PVB)为1.29 (95% CI: 1.13-1.48),表明TMQLB对PVB具有非劣效镇痛作用。TMQLB组感觉阻滞范围较PVB组宽(差异2个皮节,95% CI 1 ~ 4个皮节,P=0.004)。TMQLB组术中镇痛剂量高于PVB组(差异32µg, 95% CI: 3 ~ 62µg, P=0.03)。两组患者术后静息、运动疼痛NRS、不良反应发生率、麻醉相关满意度、恢复质量评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:TMQLB在腹腔镜部分肾切除术后48h的镇痛效果不逊于PVB。本试验注册号为NCT03975296。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Anesthesia Methods in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Network Meta-Analysis. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Component Scale (FACS). Effects of 4 mg and 8 mg Dexamethasone Added to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Perioperative Analgesia Among Adult Orthopedic Patients at Sodo Christian Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study. NPD1 Relieves Neuropathic Pain and Accelerates the Recovery of Motor Function After Peripheral Nerve Injury. Tooth Sensitivity Following Hydrogen Peroxide Bleaching With and Without Ozone: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Tooth Sensitivity Following H2O2 Versus H2O2/Ozone Bleaching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1