Measuring Biomechanical Properties Using a Noninvasive Myoton Device for Lymphedema Detection and Tracking: A Pilot Study.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2022-11-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Gabriella E Glassman, Laura Dellalana, Eric R Tkaczyk, Isaac Manzanera Esteve, Joyce Yongxu Huang, Austin Cronin, J Randall Patrinely, Shervin Etemad, Patrick E Assi, Shelia Ridner, Antonio Jorge Forte, Salam Al Kassis, Galen Perdikis
{"title":"Measuring Biomechanical Properties Using a Noninvasive Myoton Device for Lymphedema Detection and Tracking: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Gabriella E Glassman, Laura Dellalana, Eric R Tkaczyk, Isaac Manzanera Esteve, Joyce Yongxu Huang, Austin Cronin, J Randall Patrinely, Shervin Etemad, Patrick E Assi, Shelia Ridner, Antonio Jorge Forte, Salam Al Kassis, Galen Perdikis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improved techniques for lymphedema detection and monitoring of disease progression are needed. This study aims to use the noninvasive MyotonPRO Device to detect differences in biomechanical skin characteristics in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The handheld Myoton device was used to measure skin parameters including dynamic skin stiffness, oscillation frequency (tone), mechanical stress relaxation time, and creep in 11 women diagnosed with BCRL. Seven anatomical sites were measured bilaterally for each participant. The average values in the affected arms were compared with those in the contralateral unaffected arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 11 female participants with unilateral BCRL Stages 0 to II, the combined averages for dynamic skin stiffness and frequency measurements were decreased in the affected arms when compared with those for the contralateral control arms (ratio < 1). The median ratio of stiffness (affected to unaffected control arm) was 0.91 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.78-1.03) while frequency was 0.94 (IQR 0.89-1.0). Skin relaxation time and creep averages were increased in the affected arms. The relaxation time median ratio (affected to unaffected control arm) was 1.07 (IQR 1.02-1.14) and the median ratio of creep was 1.06 (IQR 1.03-1.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests the Myoton can detect differences in skin biomechanical parameters of the affected and unaffected arms in patients with BCRL. Larger studies are needed to draw strong conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"22 ","pages":"e54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9664374/pdf/eplasty-22-e54.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improved techniques for lymphedema detection and monitoring of disease progression are needed. This study aims to use the noninvasive MyotonPRO Device to detect differences in biomechanical skin characteristics in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).

Methods: The handheld Myoton device was used to measure skin parameters including dynamic skin stiffness, oscillation frequency (tone), mechanical stress relaxation time, and creep in 11 women diagnosed with BCRL. Seven anatomical sites were measured bilaterally for each participant. The average values in the affected arms were compared with those in the contralateral unaffected arms.

Results: Among the 11 female participants with unilateral BCRL Stages 0 to II, the combined averages for dynamic skin stiffness and frequency measurements were decreased in the affected arms when compared with those for the contralateral control arms (ratio < 1). The median ratio of stiffness (affected to unaffected control arm) was 0.91 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.78-1.03) while frequency was 0.94 (IQR 0.89-1.0). Skin relaxation time and creep averages were increased in the affected arms. The relaxation time median ratio (affected to unaffected control arm) was 1.07 (IQR 1.02-1.14) and the median ratio of creep was 1.06 (IQR 1.03-1.16).

Conclusions: This study suggests the Myoton can detect differences in skin biomechanical parameters of the affected and unaffected arms in patients with BCRL. Larger studies are needed to draw strong conclusions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用无创Myoton装置测量淋巴水肿检测和跟踪的生物力学特性:一项试点研究。
背景:需要改进淋巴水肿检测和疾病进展监测技术。本研究旨在使用无创MyotonPRO设备检测乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)患者生物力学皮肤特征的差异。方法:采用手持式Myoton仪测量11例诊断为BCRL的女性皮肤动态刚度、振动频率(音调)、机械应力松弛时间、蠕变等皮肤参数。对每个参与者的7个解剖部位进行双侧测量。将受影响手臂的平均值与对侧未受影响手臂的平均值进行比较。结果:在11名患有单侧BCRL 0至II期的女性参与者中,与对侧对照组相比,受影响手臂的动态皮肤刚度和频率测量的联合平均值降低(比值< 1)。(受影响与未受影响的对照组)的中位刚度比为0.91(四分位间距[IQR] 0.78-1.03),而频率为0.94 (IQR 0.89-1.0)。患臂皮肤松弛时间和蠕变平均值增加。松弛时间中位数比(受影响组与未受影响组)为1.07 (IQR 1.02-1.14),蠕变中位数比为1.06 (IQR 1.03-1.16)。结论:本研究提示Myoton可以检测BCRL患者患肢和未患肢皮肤生物力学参数的差异。需要更大规模的研究才能得出强有力的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Size Really Matter? A Review on How to Determine the Optimal Umbilical Size During an Abdominoplasty. The 5 D's to Dunk the Dog: A Retrospective Clinical Review to Prevent Dog-Ear Contour Abnormalities in Vertical Breast Reductions and Breast Lifts. Beneficial Impact of "Supercharged" Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap With Indocyanine Green Angiography on Reconstruction in a Patient at High Risk for Necrosis. The Safety of Long Inframammary Fold to Nipple Lengths in Inferior Pedicle Breast Reductions: A Decade of Experience. Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1