The minimal clinically important difference of the Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1080/2000656X.2023.2172024
Jens Jørgsholm, Rasmus Wejnold Jørgensen
{"title":"The minimal clinically important difference of the Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme.","authors":"Jens Jørgsholm,&nbsp;Rasmus Wejnold Jørgensen","doi":"10.1080/2000656X.2023.2172024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported outcome questionnaires is important in the interpretation of outcome in clinical and research settings. MCID represents the smallest difference in score that the patient would identify as important. There is, to our knowledge, no reported MCID value for Southampton Dupuytren's scoring scheme (SDSS). The SDSS is a 5-item 20 points scale, where 0 is considered no discomfort or physical limitations and 20 is the worst possible discomfort and physical limitations. The aim of this study was to determine the MCID for the SDSS. The study population consisted of 192 patients, in a prospective period from 2018 to 2021. All patients completed baseline SDSS questionnaires and again at 6 months follow-up with an external anchor question added. We calculated the mean change in scores of SDSS and used the anchor-based approach as well as a distribution-based method to calculate the MCID. At 6 months 163/192 (85%) of the patients were satisfied with the treatment according to the anchor question. In conclusion, the MCID of the SDSS for patients receiving treatment for DD is 1.5 points when estimated by an anchor-based approach and 1.62 points when estimated by a distribution-based approach. These MCID values should be considered in the interpretation of SDSS scores in the future, as well as when planning future studies on DD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"57 1-6","pages":"539-544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2023.2172024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported outcome questionnaires is important in the interpretation of outcome in clinical and research settings. MCID represents the smallest difference in score that the patient would identify as important. There is, to our knowledge, no reported MCID value for Southampton Dupuytren's scoring scheme (SDSS). The SDSS is a 5-item 20 points scale, where 0 is considered no discomfort or physical limitations and 20 is the worst possible discomfort and physical limitations. The aim of this study was to determine the MCID for the SDSS. The study population consisted of 192 patients, in a prospective period from 2018 to 2021. All patients completed baseline SDSS questionnaires and again at 6 months follow-up with an external anchor question added. We calculated the mean change in scores of SDSS and used the anchor-based approach as well as a distribution-based method to calculate the MCID. At 6 months 163/192 (85%) of the patients were satisfied with the treatment according to the anchor question. In conclusion, the MCID of the SDSS for patients receiving treatment for DD is 1.5 points when estimated by an anchor-based approach and 1.62 points when estimated by a distribution-based approach. These MCID values should be considered in the interpretation of SDSS scores in the future, as well as when planning future studies on DD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南安普顿Dupuytren评分方案的最小临床重要差异。
患者报告结果问卷的最小临床重要差异(MCID)在临床和研究环境中对结果的解释很重要。MCID代表了患者认为重要的最小差异评分。据我们所知,没有报道南安普顿Dupuytren的得分方案(SDSS)的MCID值。SDSS是一个5个项目的20分量表,其中0表示没有不适或身体限制,20表示最严重的不适和身体限制。本研究的目的是确定SDSS的MCID。研究人群包括192名患者,预期期为2018年至2021年。所有患者都完成了基线SDSS问卷,并在6个月的随访中再次添加了一个外部锚定问题。我们计算了SDSS得分的平均变化,并使用基于锚点的方法和基于分布的方法来计算MCID。6个月时,163/192(85%)的患者根据锚定问题对治疗满意。综上所述,接受DD治疗的患者的SDSS的MCID在基于锚点的方法估计时为1.5分,在基于分布的方法估计时为1.62分。这些MCID值应该在未来解释SDSS分数时考虑,以及在规划未来的DD研究时考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery is to serve as an international forum for plastic surgery, hand surgery and related research. Interest is focused on original articles on basic research and clinical evaluation. The scope of the journal comprises: • Articles concerning operative methods and follow-up studies • Research articles on subjects related to plastic and hand surgery • Articles on cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including cleft lip and palate surgery. Extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics such as microvascular surgery, craniofacial surgery, or burns. Supplements, usually doctoral theses, may also be published. The journal is published for the Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica society and sponsored by the Key Foundation, Sweden. The journal was previously published as Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery.
期刊最新文献
An evaluation of the scapular osseous free flap in maxillary reconstruction using the FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer Module for patient-reported outcome measures. Arthroscopic-assisted total wrist arthrodesis: surgical design and clinical outcomes. A reliable and objective method of measuring soft tissue changes in 2D photographs after distraction osteogenesis in individuals with CL/P. Clinical presentation of hemifacial microsomia in a South African population. Variations in orbital morphology, globe:orbit volume relation, and ophthalmological outcome in unicoronal synostosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1