Ultrafiltration-induced decrease in relative blood volume is larger in hemodialysis patients with low specific blood volume: Results from a dialysate bolus administration study

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-01-26 DOI:10.1111/hdi.13066
Michael Schmiedecker, Simon Krenn, Maximilian Waller, Christopher Paschen, Sebastian Mussnig, Janosch Niknam, Peter Wabel, Christopher C. Mayer, Manfred Hecking, Daniel Schneditz
{"title":"Ultrafiltration-induced decrease in relative blood volume is larger in hemodialysis patients with low specific blood volume: Results from a dialysate bolus administration study","authors":"Michael Schmiedecker,&nbsp;Simon Krenn,&nbsp;Maximilian Waller,&nbsp;Christopher Paschen,&nbsp;Sebastian Mussnig,&nbsp;Janosch Niknam,&nbsp;Peter Wabel,&nbsp;Christopher C. Mayer,&nbsp;Manfred Hecking,&nbsp;Daniel Schneditz","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Prescribing the ultrafiltration in hemodialysis patients remains challenging and might benefit from the information on absolute blood volume, estimated by intradialytic dialysate bolus administration. Here, we aimed at determining the relationship between absolute blood volume, normalized for body mass (specific blood volume, Vs), and ultrafiltration-induced decrease in relative blood volume (∆RBV) as well as clinical parameters including body mass index (BMI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective analysis comprised 77 patients who had their dialysate bolus-based absolute blood volume extracted routinely with an automated method. Patient-specific characteristics and ∆RBV were analyzed as a function of Vs, dichotomizing the data above or below a previously proposed threshold of 65 ml/kg for Vs. Statistical methodology comprised descriptive analyses, two-group comparisons, and correlation analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Median Vs was 68.6 ml/kg (54.9 ml/kg [Quartile 1], 83.4 ml/kg [Quartile 3]). Relative blood volume decreased by 6.3% (2.6%, 12.2%) over the entire hemodialysis session. Vs correlated inversely with BMI (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.688, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). ∆RBV was 9.8% in the group of patients with Vs &lt;65 ml/kg versus 6.0% in the group of patients with Vs ≥65 ml/kg (<i>p</i> = 0.024). The two groups did not differ significantly regarding their specific ultrafiltration volume, normalized for body mass, which amounted to 34.1 ml/kg and 36.0 ml/kg in both groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.630). ∆RBV correlated inversely with Vs (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.299, <i>p</i> = 0.008).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The present study suggests that patients with higher BMI and lower Vs experience larger blood volume changes, despite similar ultrafiltration requirements. These results underline the clinical plausibility and importance of dialysate bolus-based absolute blood volume determination in the assessment of target weight, especially in view of a previous study where intradialytic morbid events could be decreased when the target weight was adjusted, based on Vs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hdi.13066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hdi.13066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Prescribing the ultrafiltration in hemodialysis patients remains challenging and might benefit from the information on absolute blood volume, estimated by intradialytic dialysate bolus administration. Here, we aimed at determining the relationship between absolute blood volume, normalized for body mass (specific blood volume, Vs), and ultrafiltration-induced decrease in relative blood volume (∆RBV) as well as clinical parameters including body mass index (BMI).

Methods

This retrospective analysis comprised 77 patients who had their dialysate bolus-based absolute blood volume extracted routinely with an automated method. Patient-specific characteristics and ∆RBV were analyzed as a function of Vs, dichotomizing the data above or below a previously proposed threshold of 65 ml/kg for Vs. Statistical methodology comprised descriptive analyses, two-group comparisons, and correlation analyses.

Findings

Median Vs was 68.6 ml/kg (54.9 ml/kg [Quartile 1], 83.4 ml/kg [Quartile 3]). Relative blood volume decreased by 6.3% (2.6%, 12.2%) over the entire hemodialysis session. Vs correlated inversely with BMI (rs = −0.688, p < 0.001). ∆RBV was 9.8% in the group of patients with Vs <65 ml/kg versus 6.0% in the group of patients with Vs ≥65 ml/kg (p = 0.024). The two groups did not differ significantly regarding their specific ultrafiltration volume, normalized for body mass, which amounted to 34.1 ml/kg and 36.0 ml/kg in both groups, respectively (p = 0.630). ∆RBV correlated inversely with Vs (rs = −0.299, p = 0.008).

Discussion

The present study suggests that patients with higher BMI and lower Vs experience larger blood volume changes, despite similar ultrafiltration requirements. These results underline the clinical plausibility and importance of dialysate bolus-based absolute blood volume determination in the assessment of target weight, especially in view of a previous study where intradialytic morbid events could be decreased when the target weight was adjusted, based on Vs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超滤诱导的相对血容量下降在低比血容量的血液透析患者中更大:来自透析液大剂量给药研究的结果
在血液透析患者中开超滤处方仍然具有挑战性,并且可能受益于绝对血容量的信息,通过透析内透析液大剂量给药来估计。在这里,我们旨在确定绝对血容量(按体重归一化)与超滤引起的相对血容量下降(∆RBV)以及包括体重指数(BMI)在内的临床参数之间的关系。方法回顾性分析77例透析液全自动绝对血容量提取患者。将患者特异性特征和∆RBV作为Vs的函数进行分析,将高于或低于先前提出的Vs阈值65 ml/kg的数据进行二分类。统计方法包括描述性分析、两组比较和相关性分析。中位Vs为68.6 ml/kg (54.9 ml/kg[四分位1],83.4 ml/kg[四分位3])。在整个血液透析期间,相对血容量下降了6.3%(2.6%,12.2%)。Vs与BMI呈负相关(rs = - 0.688, p < 0.001)。Vs≥65 ml/kg组∆RBV为9.8%,Vs≥65 ml/kg组为6.0% (p = 0.024)。两组的超滤体积(按体重归一化)没有显著差异,两组的超滤体积分别为34.1 ml/kg和36.0 ml/kg (p = 0.630)。∆RBV与Vs呈负相关(rs = - 0.299, p = 0.008)。本研究表明,尽管超滤要求相似,但BMI高、Vs低的患者血容量变化更大。这些结果强调了以透析液量为基础的绝对血容量测定在评估目标体重时的临床合理性和重要性,特别是考虑到先前的一项研究表明,根据Vs.调整目标体重可以减少分析内发病事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Advances in craniosynostosis-Basic science to clinical practice. Data analysis in imaging (DAIM) - A new RMS science section. ModularImageAnalysis (MIA): Assembly of modularised image and object analysis workflows in ImageJ. CellProfiler plugins - An easy image analysis platform integration for containers and Python tools. Bridging imaging users to imaging analysis - A community survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1