Can antibiotics affect the clinical features of patients with candidemia? The retrospective evaluation of 5 years of data in an intensive care unit.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003673
Mefküre Durmuş, Serkan Kalkan, Sena Güzel Karahan, Murat Biçakcioğlu, Nesligül Özdemir, Zeynep Ülkü Gün, Ayşe Belin Özer
{"title":"Can antibiotics affect the clinical features of patients with candidemia? The retrospective evaluation of 5 years of data in an intensive care unit.","authors":"Mefküre Durmuş, Serkan Kalkan, Sena Güzel Karahan, Murat Biçakcioğlu, Nesligül Özdemir, Zeynep Ülkü Gün, Ayşe Belin Özer","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Candidemia is an opportunistic infection of intensive care units (ICUs) and causes morbidity and mortality. Multiple antibiotic exposure was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality and non-albicans candidemia (NAC) in candidemia patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between antibiotics and clinical features of patients with candidemia, and to determine the independent risk factors for hospital stay >50 days, 30-day mortality in hospital, candidemia types, and septic shock in candidemia patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were evaluated retrospectively for 5 years. A total of 148 candidemia cases were detected and included in the study. Characteristics of cases were defined and recorded. The relationship between qualitative data was determined by the χ<sup>2</sup> test. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors for hospital stay >50 days, 30-day mortality in hospital, candidemia types, and septic shock in candidemia patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of candidemia for 5 years was 4.5%. <i>Candida parapsilosis</i> was the most reported species with 65% (n=97). Linezolid and central venous catheters (CVC) were found to be independent risk factors for NAC. Carbapenems and cephalosporins were found in association to lower mortality. No antibiotics or characteristics were found to be independent risk factors for mortality. Some broad spectrum antibiotics and antibiotic combinations were found in relationship with hospital stay >50 days; however, none of them were found to be independent risk factors. Metisilin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotics, meropenem+linezolid piperacillin-tazobactam+fluoroquinolones and comorbidity were found in association with septic shock, although only piperacillin-tazobactam+fluoroquinolones and comorbidity were found to be independent risk factors for septic shock.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study concluded that many antibiotics were safe for candidemia patients. However, clinicians should pay attention when prescribing linezolid or piperacillin-tazobactam and flouroquinolons concomitantly or sequentially for patients with candidemia risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":"416-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Candidemia is an opportunistic infection of intensive care units (ICUs) and causes morbidity and mortality. Multiple antibiotic exposure was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality and non-albicans candidemia (NAC) in candidemia patients.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between antibiotics and clinical features of patients with candidemia, and to determine the independent risk factors for hospital stay >50 days, 30-day mortality in hospital, candidemia types, and septic shock in candidemia patients.

Methods: Patients were evaluated retrospectively for 5 years. A total of 148 candidemia cases were detected and included in the study. Characteristics of cases were defined and recorded. The relationship between qualitative data was determined by the χ2 test. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors for hospital stay >50 days, 30-day mortality in hospital, candidemia types, and septic shock in candidemia patients.

Results: The incidence of candidemia for 5 years was 4.5%. Candida parapsilosis was the most reported species with 65% (n=97). Linezolid and central venous catheters (CVC) were found to be independent risk factors for NAC. Carbapenems and cephalosporins were found in association to lower mortality. No antibiotics or characteristics were found to be independent risk factors for mortality. Some broad spectrum antibiotics and antibiotic combinations were found in relationship with hospital stay >50 days; however, none of them were found to be independent risk factors. Metisilin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotics, meropenem+linezolid piperacillin-tazobactam+fluoroquinolones and comorbidity were found in association with septic shock, although only piperacillin-tazobactam+fluoroquinolones and comorbidity were found to be independent risk factors for septic shock.

Conclusions: This study concluded that many antibiotics were safe for candidemia patients. However, clinicians should pay attention when prescribing linezolid or piperacillin-tazobactam and flouroquinolons concomitantly or sequentially for patients with candidemia risk factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗生素会影响念珠菌血症患者的临床特征吗?对重症监护病房 5 年数据的回顾性评估。
背景:念珠菌血症是重症监护病房(ICU)的一种机会性感染,会导致发病率和死亡率。目的:本研究旨在确定抗生素与念珠菌血症患者临床特征之间的关系,并确定念珠菌血症患者住院时间超过 50 天、住院 30 天死亡率、念珠菌血症类型和脓毒性休克的独立风险因素:方法: 对患者进行为期 5 年的回顾性评估。研究共发现并纳入了 148 例念珠菌血症病例。对病例的特征进行了定义和记录。定性数据之间的关系通过χ2检验确定。采用逻辑回归分析确定念珠菌血症患者住院时间超过50天、住院30天死亡率、念珠菌血症类型和脓毒性休克的独立风险因素:结果:5 年内念珠菌病的发病率为 4.5%。报告最多的念珠菌是副丝状念珠菌,占 65%(97 人)。发现利奈唑胺和中心静脉导管(CVC)是导致 NAC 的独立风险因素。发现碳青霉烯类和头孢菌素与降低死亡率有关。没有发现任何抗生素或抗生素特性是死亡率的独立风险因素。发现一些广谱抗生素和抗生素组合与住院时间超过 50 天有关,但没有发现它们是独立的风险因素。发现耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)抗生素、美罗培南+利奈唑胺、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦+氟喹诺酮类药物和合并症与脓毒性休克有关,但只有哌拉西林-他唑巴坦+氟喹诺酮类药物和合并症是脓毒性休克的独立危险因素:本研究认为,许多抗生素对念珠菌血症患者都是安全的。然而,临床医生在为有念珠菌血症风险因素的患者同时或依次处方利奈唑胺或哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和氟喹诺酮类药物时应注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
期刊最新文献
Mobile pharmacies of the Ukrainian chain 'Apteka 9-1-1': access to medicines during the war in Ukraine. Integrating automated dispensing cabinets into the medication dispensing process: feedback from the practice in European hospitals. Cardiovascular events in eGFR-mutation non-small-cell lung cancer patients on osimertinib. Ceftaroline combination therapy for methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia and endocarditis. Predictive performance of glomerular filtration rate equations based on cystatin C, creatinine and their combination in critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1