Psychometric tests, critical flicker frequency, and inflammatory indicators in covert hepatic encephalopathy diagnosis.

IF 1.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatology Forum Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14744/hf.2022.2022.0010
Erkut Demirciler, Nilay Danis, Pelin Ergun, Timur Kose, Ilker Turan, Fulya Gunsar, Ulus Salih Akarca, Galip Ersoz, Zeki Karasu
{"title":"Psychometric tests, critical flicker frequency, and inflammatory indicators in covert hepatic encephalopathy diagnosis.","authors":"Erkut Demirciler,&nbsp;Nilay Danis,&nbsp;Pelin Ergun,&nbsp;Timur Kose,&nbsp;Ilker Turan,&nbsp;Fulya Gunsar,&nbsp;Ulus Salih Akarca,&nbsp;Galip Ersoz,&nbsp;Zeki Karasu","doi":"10.14744/hf.2022.2022.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent complication of liver diseases. Systemic inflammation is key for HE pathogenesis. The main goal of the study was to investigate the role of psychometric tests, critical flicker frequency (CFF), and comparative evaluation of inflammatory indicators for the diagnosis of covert HE (CHE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was a prospective, nonrandomized, case-control study with a total of 76 cirrhotic patients and 30 healthy volunteers. The West Haven criteria were used to determine the occurrence of CHE in cirrhotic patients. Psychometric tests were applied to healthy and cirrhotic groups. CFF, venous ammonia, serum endotoxin, IL-6, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels, and hemogram parameters were evaluated for cirrhotic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFF values and psychometric tests were found to accurately discriminate CHE positives from CHE negatives (p<0.05). When the control group was excluded, the digit symbol test and the number connection A test failed, unlike CFF and other psychometric tests. Using CFF, a 45 Hz cutoff value had 74% specificity and 75% sensitivity. Basal albumin levels (p=0.063), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (p=0.086), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p 0.052) were significant, albeit slightly, among CHE groups. Basal albumin levels had 50% sensitivity and 71% specificity when 2.8 g/dL was used as a cutoff value to determine CHE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both psychometric tests and CFF can be useful in diagnosing CHE. Using cytokine and endotoxin levels seems to be inadequate to diagnose CHE. Using LMR and albumin levels instead of psychometric tests for diagnosing CHE can be promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":29722,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/57/hf-4-019.PMC9951890.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/hf.2022.2022.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent complication of liver diseases. Systemic inflammation is key for HE pathogenesis. The main goal of the study was to investigate the role of psychometric tests, critical flicker frequency (CFF), and comparative evaluation of inflammatory indicators for the diagnosis of covert HE (CHE).

Materials and methods: The study was a prospective, nonrandomized, case-control study with a total of 76 cirrhotic patients and 30 healthy volunteers. The West Haven criteria were used to determine the occurrence of CHE in cirrhotic patients. Psychometric tests were applied to healthy and cirrhotic groups. CFF, venous ammonia, serum endotoxin, IL-6, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels, and hemogram parameters were evaluated for cirrhotic patients.

Results: CFF values and psychometric tests were found to accurately discriminate CHE positives from CHE negatives (p<0.05). When the control group was excluded, the digit symbol test and the number connection A test failed, unlike CFF and other psychometric tests. Using CFF, a 45 Hz cutoff value had 74% specificity and 75% sensitivity. Basal albumin levels (p=0.063), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (p=0.086), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p 0.052) were significant, albeit slightly, among CHE groups. Basal albumin levels had 50% sensitivity and 71% specificity when 2.8 g/dL was used as a cutoff value to determine CHE.

Conclusion: Both psychometric tests and CFF can be useful in diagnosing CHE. Using cytokine and endotoxin levels seems to be inadequate to diagnose CHE. Using LMR and albumin levels instead of psychometric tests for diagnosing CHE can be promising.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐性肝性脑病诊断中的心理测试、临界闪烁频率和炎症指标。
背景与目的:肝性脑病(HE)是肝脏疾病的常见并发症。全身性炎症是HE发病的关键。本研究的主要目的是探讨心理测试、临界闪烁频率(CFF)和炎症指标的比较评估在隐匿性HE (CHE)诊断中的作用。材料和方法:该研究是一项前瞻性、非随机、病例对照研究,共有76名肝硬化患者和30名健康志愿者。使用West Haven标准来确定肝硬化患者中CHE的发生率。心理测量测试应用于健康组和肝硬化组。评估肝硬化患者的CFF、静脉氨、血清内毒素、IL-6、IL-18、肿瘤坏死因子α (TNF-α)水平及血象参数。结果:CFF值和心理测试能准确区分CHE阳性和CHE阴性(结论:心理测试和CFF都能诊断CHE。使用细胞因子和内毒素水平似乎不足以诊断CHE。用LMR和白蛋白水平代替心理测试来诊断CHE是有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety analysis of different ıntensities of elf-pemf in terms of apoptotic, inflammatory, and transcription factor NF-Κb expression levels in rat liver. An alternative method in the diagnosis of intrabiliary lesions: Percutaneous endobiliary brush biopsy. D-dimer is a prognostic marker for 1-year mortality in patients with chronic liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy. Intrabiliary pressure in the pathophysiology of extra hepatic biliary obstruction. Leflunomide induced fatal dress syndrome need liver transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1