Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601231168967
Sergio Salerno, Cosimo Nardi, Mario Pace, Lidia Rabiolo, Federica Flammia, Francesco Loverre, Domenica Matranga, Claudio Granata, Paolo Tomà, Stefano Colagrande
{"title":"Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?","authors":"Sergio Salerno,&nbsp;Cosimo Nardi,&nbsp;Mario Pace,&nbsp;Lidia Rabiolo,&nbsp;Federica Flammia,&nbsp;Francesco Loverre,&nbsp;Domenica Matranga,&nbsp;Claudio Granata,&nbsp;Paolo Tomà,&nbsp;Stefano Colagrande","doi":"10.1177/20584601231168967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The newly adopted European directive DE59/2013 mandates adequate patient information in procedures involving ionising radiation. Patient interest in knowing about their radiation dose and an effective communication method for dose exposure remain poorly investigated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study is aimed at investigating both patient interest in radiation dose and an effective method to communicate radiation dose exposure.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The present analysis is based on a multi-centre cross-sectional data collection involving 1,084 patients from four different hospitals ‒ two general and two paediatric hospitals. Anonymous questionnaires were administered, consisting of an initial overview of radiation use in imaging procedures, a patient data section, and an explanatory section providing information in four modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1009 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 refusing participation; 173 participants were relatives of paediatric patients. Initial information provided to patients was considered comprehensible. The information modality with symbols was considered the most readily understandable format by patients, with no appreciable differences in comprehension attributable to social or cultural background. The modality including dose numbers and diagnostic reference levels was preferred by patients with higher socio-economic background. The option 'None of those' was selected by one-third of our sample population, composed of four different clusters: female, over 60 years old, unemployed, and from low socio-economic backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a high level of interest amongst patients in knowing about radiation dose exposure. Pictorial representations were well understood by patients from a variety of different ages and education levels. However, a universally comprehensible model of communicating radiation dose information remains to be elucidated.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/81/28/10.1177_20584601231168967.PMC10123897.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601231168967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The newly adopted European directive DE59/2013 mandates adequate patient information in procedures involving ionising radiation. Patient interest in knowing about their radiation dose and an effective communication method for dose exposure remain poorly investigated.

Purpose: This study is aimed at investigating both patient interest in radiation dose and an effective method to communicate radiation dose exposure.

Material and methods: The present analysis is based on a multi-centre cross-sectional data collection involving 1,084 patients from four different hospitals ‒ two general and two paediatric hospitals. Anonymous questionnaires were administered, consisting of an initial overview of radiation use in imaging procedures, a patient data section, and an explanatory section providing information in four modalities.

Results: 1009 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 refusing participation; 173 participants were relatives of paediatric patients. Initial information provided to patients was considered comprehensible. The information modality with symbols was considered the most readily understandable format by patients, with no appreciable differences in comprehension attributable to social or cultural background. The modality including dose numbers and diagnostic reference levels was preferred by patients with higher socio-economic background. The option 'None of those' was selected by one-third of our sample population, composed of four different clusters: female, over 60 years old, unemployed, and from low socio-economic backgrounds.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated a high level of interest amongst patients in knowing about radiation dose exposure. Pictorial representations were well understood by patients from a variety of different ages and education levels. However, a universally comprehensible model of communicating radiation dose information remains to be elucidated.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学成像中的辐射剂量沟通:如何最好地告知我们的患者?
背景:新通过的欧洲指令DE59/2013要求在涉及电离辐射的手术中提供足够的患者信息。患者对了解其辐射剂量的兴趣以及剂量暴露的有效沟通方法的调查仍然很少。目的:本研究旨在探讨患者对辐射剂量的兴趣以及辐射剂量暴露的有效沟通方法。材料和方法:目前的分析基于多中心横断面数据收集,涉及来自四家不同医院(两家综合医院和两家儿科医院)的1,084名患者。进行匿名问卷调查,包括成像过程中辐射使用的初步概述,患者资料部分和提供四种模式信息的解释部分。结果:1009例患者纳入分析,其中75例拒绝参与;173名参与者是儿科患者的亲属。向患者提供的初步信息被认为是可以理解的。带有符号的信息形式被患者认为是最容易理解的格式,在理解上没有明显的社会或文化背景差异。社会经济背景较高的患者更倾向于采用包括剂量数和诊断参考水平的方法。三分之一的样本人口选择了“这些都不是”选项,这些人由四个不同的群体组成:女性、60岁以上、失业和社会经济背景较低。结论:这项研究表明,患者对了解辐射剂量暴露非常感兴趣。不同年龄和受教育程度的患者都能很好地理解图像。然而,一个普遍可理解的辐射剂量信息交流模型仍有待阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Differential diagnosis between low-risk and high-risk thymoma: Comparison of diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without deep learning model. Computed tomography patterns and clinical outcomes of radiation pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Cranial nerves bridging the middle ear and cerebellum causing cerebellar peduncle abscess: A case report. Invasive trigeminal ganglioneuroma: A case report and review of the literature. A case of primary osteosarcoma in the occipital bone: A relatively common tumor in an uncommon location.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1