Julian S. Haimovich MD , Nate Diamant BS , Shaan Khurshid MD, MPH , Paolo Di Achille PhD , Christopher Reeder PhD , Sam Friedman PhD , Pulkit Singh BA , Walter Spurlock BA , Patrick T. Ellinor MD, PhD , Anthony Philippakis MD, PhD , Puneet Batra PhD , Jennifer E. Ho MD , Steven A. Lubitz MD, MPH
{"title":"Artificial intelligence–enabled classification of hypertrophic heart diseases using electrocardiograms","authors":"Julian S. Haimovich MD , Nate Diamant BS , Shaan Khurshid MD, MPH , Paolo Di Achille PhD , Christopher Reeder PhD , Sam Friedman PhD , Pulkit Singh BA , Walter Spurlock BA , Patrick T. Ellinor MD, PhD , Anthony Philippakis MD, PhD , Puneet Batra PhD , Jennifer E. Ho MD , Steven A. Lubitz MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Differentiating among cardiac diseases associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) informs diagnosis and clinical care.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate if artificial intelligence–enabled analysis of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) facilitates automated detection and classification of LVH.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a pretrained convolutional neural network to derive numerical representations of 12-lead ECG waveforms from patients in a multi-institutional healthcare system who had cardiac diseases associated with LVH (n = 50,709), including cardiac amyloidosis (n = 304), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1056), hypertension (n = 20,802), aortic stenosis (n = 446), and other causes (n = 4766). We then regressed LVH etiologies relative to no LVH on age, sex, and the numerical 12-lead representations using logistic regression (“LVH-Net”). To assess deep learning model performance on single-lead data analogous to mobile ECGs, we also developed 2 single-lead deep learning models by training models on lead I (“LVH-Net Lead I”) or lead II (“LVH-Net Lead II”) from the 12-lead ECG. We compared the performance of the LVH-Net models to alternative models fit on (1) age, sex, and standard ECG measures, and (2) clinical ECG-based rules for diagnosing LVH.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve of LVH-Net by specific LVH etiology were cardiac amyloidosis 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93–0.97], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 0.92 [95% CI, 0.90–0.94], aortic stenosis LVH 0.90 [95% CI, 0.88-0.92], hypertensive LVH 0.76 [95% CI, 0.76-0.77], and other LVH 0.69 [95% CI 0.68-0.71]. The single-lead models also discriminated LVH etiologies well.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An artificial intelligence–enabled ECG model is favorable for detection and classification of LVH and outperforms clinical ECG-based rules.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 48-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10123506/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background
Differentiating among cardiac diseases associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) informs diagnosis and clinical care.
Objective
To evaluate if artificial intelligence–enabled analysis of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) facilitates automated detection and classification of LVH.
Methods
We used a pretrained convolutional neural network to derive numerical representations of 12-lead ECG waveforms from patients in a multi-institutional healthcare system who had cardiac diseases associated with LVH (n = 50,709), including cardiac amyloidosis (n = 304), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1056), hypertension (n = 20,802), aortic stenosis (n = 446), and other causes (n = 4766). We then regressed LVH etiologies relative to no LVH on age, sex, and the numerical 12-lead representations using logistic regression (“LVH-Net”). To assess deep learning model performance on single-lead data analogous to mobile ECGs, we also developed 2 single-lead deep learning models by training models on lead I (“LVH-Net Lead I”) or lead II (“LVH-Net Lead II”) from the 12-lead ECG. We compared the performance of the LVH-Net models to alternative models fit on (1) age, sex, and standard ECG measures, and (2) clinical ECG-based rules for diagnosing LVH.
Results
The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve of LVH-Net by specific LVH etiology were cardiac amyloidosis 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93–0.97], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 0.92 [95% CI, 0.90–0.94], aortic stenosis LVH 0.90 [95% CI, 0.88-0.92], hypertensive LVH 0.76 [95% CI, 0.76-0.77], and other LVH 0.69 [95% CI 0.68-0.71]. The single-lead models also discriminated LVH etiologies well.
Conclusion
An artificial intelligence–enabled ECG model is favorable for detection and classification of LVH and outperforms clinical ECG-based rules.