Protocol for a scoping review on the development of policy, guidelines and protocols within emergency medical services.

John Renshaw, Mary Halter, Tom Quinn
{"title":"Protocol for a scoping review on the development of policy, guidelines and protocols within emergency medical services.","authors":"John Renshaw, Mary Halter, Tom Quinn","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency medical services (EMS) use a combination of policy, clinical practice guidelines and protocols to set out their expectations for service delivery and to inform patient care. While these are integral to how EMS now operate, relatively little is known about how they are developed, or the processes involved. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to understand what is known in the literature about the development of policy, guidelines and protocols within EMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) methodological framework for scoping reviews. A search strategy has been developed using index term definitions, building from authors' knowledge of the field. The following electronic databases will be searched from 2002 to 2021 for all types of publication: CINAHL, Medline, Academic Search Complete and PsycINFO, EMBASE, Nursing and Allied Health, the Cochrane library, NICE Evidence, Scopus, OpenGrey, EThOS, Google Scholar, Google search and key EMS journal websites. The results will be downloaded using EndNote<sup>X9</sup> reference management software and duplicates will be removed. Titles and abstracts of the results will be independently screened for their relevance to the research question, and the full text of each selected publication will be assessed against pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine its eligibility. The reference list and forward citations will be searched for articles meeting the eligibility criteria. A second researcher will independently assess a 10% sample of results to allow for validation of this assessment. Data will be extracted and charted on the characteristics of the publications and the knowledge they contribute on the development of policy, guidelines or protocols. Accompanying narratives will be presented to identify themes and gaps in the available evidence. A critical appraisal will be undertaken of the included publications, where empirical research is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":"6 4","pages":"48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8892452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British paramedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2022.03.6.4.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency medical services (EMS) use a combination of policy, clinical practice guidelines and protocols to set out their expectations for service delivery and to inform patient care. While these are integral to how EMS now operate, relatively little is known about how they are developed, or the processes involved. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to understand what is known in the literature about the development of policy, guidelines and protocols within EMS.

Methods: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley (2005) methodological framework for scoping reviews. A search strategy has been developed using index term definitions, building from authors' knowledge of the field. The following electronic databases will be searched from 2002 to 2021 for all types of publication: CINAHL, Medline, Academic Search Complete and PsycINFO, EMBASE, Nursing and Allied Health, the Cochrane library, NICE Evidence, Scopus, OpenGrey, EThOS, Google Scholar, Google search and key EMS journal websites. The results will be downloaded using EndNoteX9 reference management software and duplicates will be removed. Titles and abstracts of the results will be independently screened for their relevance to the research question, and the full text of each selected publication will be assessed against pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine its eligibility. The reference list and forward citations will be searched for articles meeting the eligibility criteria. A second researcher will independently assess a 10% sample of results to allow for validation of this assessment. Data will be extracted and charted on the characteristics of the publications and the knowledge they contribute on the development of policy, guidelines or protocols. Accompanying narratives will be presented to identify themes and gaps in the available evidence. A critical appraisal will be undertaken of the included publications, where empirical research is presented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于制定紧急医疗服务政策、指导方针和协议的范围审查协议。
导言:紧急医疗服务(EMS)采用政策、临床实践指南和协议相结合的方式,规定其对提供服务的期望,并为患者护理提供信息。虽然这些都是目前急救医疗服务运作不可或缺的一部分,但人们对它们的制定方式或过程却知之甚少。因此,本次范围界定综述的目的是了解文献中有关制定急救医疗服务政策、指南和规程的内容:本范围界定综述将遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)的范围界定综述方法框架。根据作者对该领域的了解,利用索引术语定义制定了检索策略。从 2002 年到 2021 年,将在以下电子数据库中检索所有类型的出版物:CINAHL、Medline、Academic Search Complete 和 PsycINFO、EMBASE、Nursing and Allied Health、Cochrane library、NICE Evidence、Scopus、OpenGrey、EThOS、Google Scholar、Google search 和主要 EMS 期刊网站。研究结果将使用 EndNoteX9 参考文献管理软件下载,并删除重复内容。将独立筛选结果的标题和摘要,以确定其与研究问题的相关性,并根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准评估每篇所选出版物的全文,以确定其是否合格。参考文献目录和正向引用将搜索符合资格标准的文章。第二名研究人员将独立评估 10% 的结果样本,以便对评估结果进行验证。将提取数据并绘制图表,说明出版物的特点及其对政策、指南或规程的制定所做的贡献。随附的说明将用于确定现有证据的主题和差距。在介绍实证研究时,将对收录的出版物进行批判性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A national perspective of ambulance clinicians' perceptions, experiences and decision-making processes when assessing older adults with a head injury: a mixed-methods study. A qualitative exploration of the views of paramedics regarding the use of dark humour. Chemsex: core knowledge for emergency medical service responders. Comparing telesimulation-based learning and e-learning as remote education delivery methods in pre-hospital practice. 'Endless variation on a theme': a document analysis of international and UK major trauma triage tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1