首页 > 最新文献

British paramedic journal最新文献

英文 中文
Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation. 比较全科医生非工作时间服务中的独立处方与患者小组指导的使用情况:一项回顾性横断面服务评估。
Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.21
Hayley Stevens, Beryl Mansel, Jayne Cutter

Introduction: Global demand for healthcare is escalating, prompting exploration of innovative strategies to augment service capacity. Independent prescribing (IP) helps to address this challenge, allowing non-medical professionals to prescribe medication. Paramedics in the UK were granted prescribing privileges in 2018, yet uptake remains low. Despite qualitative evidence indicating that paramedic prescribing is beneficial, quantitative comparisons of medication provision between prescribers and non-prescribers are lacking. Paramedics provide patients with non-emergency medication by three different routes: IP, using a patient group direction (PGD) or with prescriber support.Advanced paramedic practitioners who are not qualified as independent prescribers, rotating through ambulance and general practitioner out-of-hours services, offered an opportunity to quantitatively compare medication supply.

Methods: This study compares medication supply by three advanced paramedic practitioners using PGDs with three prescribing nurses in a Welsh general practitioner out-of-hours service. A cross-sectional design was employed to retrospectively review electronic patient clinical records between 1 December 2019 and 30 November 2020, including patients presenting with one of five generalised clinical conditions (urinary, soft tissue, respiratory, abdominal pain, ear). Descriptive analysis and non-parametric tests compared medications prescribed or supplied, how patients received medication and reasons for seeking prescriber support.

Results: A total of 397 patient records were analysed. Paramedics supplied medications more frequently with prescriber support (68.2%) than via PGD (27.9%). Nurses predominantly prescribed medication independently (99.3%). Medication provision was comparable when paramedics had prescriber support. Reasons for paramedic support-seeking included having no PGD available (34.1%) and PGD being excluded from use (28.4%).

Conclusions: Advanced paramedic practitioner medication supply using PGDs and prescriber support was comparable to that of prescribing nurse colleagues. However, autonomy restrictions highlight the need for paramedic prescribing in services where prescriber availability is limited. Further research evaluating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of PGD use versus IP is necessary. Additionally, the qualitative benefits of IP, such as improved patient care and satisfaction, warrant due consideration when implementing future healthcare strategies.

导言:全球对医疗保健的需求不断攀升,这促使人们探索创新战略来提高服务能力。独立处方(IP)有助于应对这一挑战,允许非医疗专业人员开具处方。2018 年,英国的辅助医务人员获得了处方权,但使用率仍然很低。尽管定性证据表明辅助医务人员开处方是有益的,但却缺乏开处方者与非开处方者之间药物供应的定量比较。辅助医务人员通过三种不同途径为患者提供非急诊药物:没有独立处方资格的高级辅助医务人员在救护车和全科医生的非工作时间服务中轮流工作,这为定量比较药物供应提供了机会:本研究比较了威尔士一家全科医生非工作时间服务机构中使用 PGD 的三名高级辅助医务人员与三名开处方的护士的药物供应情况。研究采用横断面设计,回顾性审查了 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日期间患者的电子临床记录,包括出现五种全身性临床症状(泌尿系统、软组织、呼吸系统、腹痛、耳部)之一的患者。描述性分析和非参数检验比较了处方或提供的药物、患者接受药物治疗的方式以及寻求处方支持的原因:共分析了 397 份患者记录。辅助医务人员在处方支持下提供药物的比例(68.2%)高于通过PGD提供药物的比例(27.9%)。护士主要是独立开药(99.3%)。在护理人员获得处方支持的情况下,用药情况相当。辅助医务人员寻求支持的原因包括没有可用的 PGD(34.1%)和 PGD 无法使用(28.4%):结论:使用 PGD 和处方支持的高级护理人员药物供应与开处方的护士同事相当。然而,自主权的限制凸显了在开处方人员有限的服务机构中辅助医务人员开处方的必要性。有必要开展进一步研究,评估使用 PGD 与使用 IP 的效率和成本效益。此外,在实施未来的医疗保健战略时,IP 的质量效益(如改善患者护理和满意度)也值得充分考虑。
{"title":"Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation.","authors":"Hayley Stevens, Beryl Mansel, Jayne Cutter","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.21","DOIUrl":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.21","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Global demand for healthcare is escalating, prompting exploration of innovative strategies to augment service capacity. Independent prescribing (IP) helps to address this challenge, allowing non-medical professionals to prescribe medication. Paramedics in the UK were granted prescribing privileges in 2018, yet uptake remains low. Despite qualitative evidence indicating that paramedic prescribing is beneficial, quantitative comparisons of medication provision between prescribers and non-prescribers are lacking. Paramedics provide patients with non-emergency medication by three different routes: IP, using a patient group direction (PGD) or with prescriber support.Advanced paramedic practitioners who are not qualified as independent prescribers, rotating through ambulance and general practitioner out-of-hours services, offered an opportunity to quantitatively compare medication supply.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compares medication supply by three advanced paramedic practitioners using PGDs with three prescribing nurses in a Welsh general practitioner out-of-hours service. A cross-sectional design was employed to retrospectively review electronic patient clinical records between 1 December 2019 and 30 November 2020, including patients presenting with one of five generalised clinical conditions (urinary, soft tissue, respiratory, abdominal pain, ear). Descriptive analysis and non-parametric tests compared medications prescribed or supplied, how patients received medication and reasons for seeking prescriber support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 397 patient records were analysed. Paramedics supplied medications more frequently with prescriber support (68.2%) than via PGD (27.9%). Nurses predominantly prescribed medication independently (99.3%). Medication provision was comparable when paramedics had prescriber support. Reasons for paramedic support-seeking included having no PGD available (34.1%) and PGD being excluded from use (28.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced paramedic practitioner medication supply using PGDs and prescriber support was comparable to that of prescribing nurse colleagues. However, autonomy restrictions highlight the need for paramedic prescribing in services where prescriber availability is limited. Further research evaluating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of PGD use versus IP is necessary. Additionally, the qualitative benefits of IP, such as improved patient care and satisfaction, warrant due consideration when implementing future healthcare strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376321/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Behind the screen: exploring the effects of home working on 999 telephone clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. 屏幕背后:探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间在家工作对 999 电话临床医生的影响。
Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.1
Edward Harry, Mike Brady
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly stretched global healthcare provisions since its commencement in 2019. From the outset, ambulance services in the UK had to adapt and change their working practices to meet distancing requirements, to increase staff numbers and to ease the effects of staff becoming unavailable for work due to self-isolation and illness. One strategy was moving clinicians from emergency operation centres (EOCs) to working from home. Like many international services, UK ambulance services use paramedics and nurses to undertake telephone and video assessments of patients calling the 999 emergency services line in a model known as virtual care or remote clinical decision making. Virtual care is any interaction between a patient and a clinician or clinicians, occurring remotely via information technologies.Increasing evidence is becoming available to suggest that the pandemic caused harm to the well-being of healthcare workers, primarily due to the severe stress of regular exposure to death and human suffering. However, there remains a dearth of literature focusing on the well-being of remote and virtual clinicians, especially those who moved from working in EOCs to working at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study reports the findings of a qualitative analysis of these effects from the clinician's perspective. The authors hope that the findings from this study will inform the operating, well-being and leadership practices of those delivering such services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of telephone nurses and paramedics from one UK ambulance service where home working had been implemented were contacted. Fifteen clinicians with recent home-working experience responded to the invitation to participate out of a possible 31 (48%). All participants had previously practised remote assessment from within an EOC. Semi-structured interviews took place via video-conferencing software and were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. An inductive approach was taken to generating codes, and both researchers separately read the transcripts before re-reading them, assigning initial themes and determining frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main themes were discovered, with further associated sub-themes. The main themes were: safety; financial implications; working relationships; home-working environment; and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few studies explore remote clinicians' health and well-being. This study identified that home-working clinicians felt that there had been no detrimental impact on their health and well-being because of working from home during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. While some concerns were raised, these were mitigated through the support that clinicians received at home from family members, as well as from colleagues, some of whom had developed new working relationships. Financial implications
导言:COVID-19 大流行自 2019 年开始以来已大大增加了全球医疗保健供应。从一开始,英国的救护车服务部门就不得不调整和改变工作方式,以满足拉开距离的要求,增加工作人员数量,并缓解工作人员因自我隔离和疾病而无法工作所带来的影响。其中一项策略就是将临床医生从紧急行动中心(EOC)转移到家中工作。与许多国际服务机构一样,英国救护车服务机构也使用辅助医务人员和护士对拨打 999 急救服务热线的病人进行电话和视频评估,这种模式被称为虚拟护理或远程临床决策。越来越多的证据表明,大流行病对医护人员的健康造成了损害,这主要是由于经常接触死亡和人类痛苦所带来的巨大压力。然而,关注远程和虚拟临床医生福祉的文献仍然很少,尤其是那些在 COVID-19 大流行期间从紧急医疗中心转到家中工作的临床医生。因此,本研究报告了从临床医生的角度对这些影响进行定性分析的结果。作者希望本研究的结果能够为提供此类服务的人员的工作、福利和领导实践提供参考:方法:作者联系了英国一家已实施家庭办公的救护车服务机构的电话护士和辅助医务人员。在可能参与的 31 位临床医生中,有 15 位(48%)最近有过在家工作的经历。所有参与者都曾在平机会内进行过远程评估。半结构式访谈是通过视频会议软件进行的,并进行了录音、转录和主题分析。两位研究人员分别阅读了访谈记录,然后重新阅读,确定了最初的主题并确定了频率:结果:发现了五大主题,以及更多相关的次主题。这些主题分别是:安全、财务影响、工作关系、家庭工作环境和焦虑:很少有研究探讨远程临床医生的健康和福祉。本研究发现,在 COVID-19 大流行的初期阶段,在家工作的临床医生认为在家工作对他们的健康和福利没有造成不利影响。虽然有人提出了一些担忧,但由于临床医生在家中得到了家人和同事的支持,这些担忧得到了缓解,其中一些人还建立了新的工作关系。最初,财务影响似乎导致了参与者的一些担忧,但尽管需要进一步探讨在家工作的真正财务影响,这些担忧很快就得到了缓解。
{"title":"Behind the screen: exploring the effects of home working on 999 telephone clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Edward Harry, Mike Brady","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.1","DOIUrl":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.1","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction: &lt;/strong&gt;The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly stretched global healthcare provisions since its commencement in 2019. From the outset, ambulance services in the UK had to adapt and change their working practices to meet distancing requirements, to increase staff numbers and to ease the effects of staff becoming unavailable for work due to self-isolation and illness. One strategy was moving clinicians from emergency operation centres (EOCs) to working from home. Like many international services, UK ambulance services use paramedics and nurses to undertake telephone and video assessments of patients calling the 999 emergency services line in a model known as virtual care or remote clinical decision making. Virtual care is any interaction between a patient and a clinician or clinicians, occurring remotely via information technologies.Increasing evidence is becoming available to suggest that the pandemic caused harm to the well-being of healthcare workers, primarily due to the severe stress of regular exposure to death and human suffering. However, there remains a dearth of literature focusing on the well-being of remote and virtual clinicians, especially those who moved from working in EOCs to working at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study reports the findings of a qualitative analysis of these effects from the clinician's perspective. The authors hope that the findings from this study will inform the operating, well-being and leadership practices of those delivering such services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A convenience sample of telephone nurses and paramedics from one UK ambulance service where home working had been implemented were contacted. Fifteen clinicians with recent home-working experience responded to the invitation to participate out of a possible 31 (48%). All participants had previously practised remote assessment from within an EOC. Semi-structured interviews took place via video-conferencing software and were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. An inductive approach was taken to generating codes, and both researchers separately read the transcripts before re-reading them, assigning initial themes and determining frequency.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Five main themes were discovered, with further associated sub-themes. The main themes were: safety; financial implications; working relationships; home-working environment; and anxiety.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Few studies explore remote clinicians' health and well-being. This study identified that home-working clinicians felt that there had been no detrimental impact on their health and well-being because of working from home during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. While some concerns were raised, these were mitigated through the support that clinicians received at home from family members, as well as from colleagues, some of whom had developed new working relationships. Financial implications ","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376323/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction of a section for recording dementia improves data capture on the ambulance electronic patient record: evidence from a regional quality improvement project. 引入痴呆症记录部分可改善救护车电子病历的数据采集:来自地区质量改进项目的证据。
Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.29
Phil King, Patryk Jadzinski, Helen Pocock, Chloe Lofthouse-Jones, Martina Brown, Carole Fogg

Introduction: Dementia is a common co-morbidity in older people who require urgent or emergency ambulance attendance and influences clinical decisions and care pathways. Following an initial audit of dementia data and consultation with staff, a specific section (tab) to record dementia was introduced on an ambulance service electronic patient record (ePR). This includes a dementia diagnosis button and a free-text section. We aimed to assess whether and how this improved recording.

Methods: To re-audit the proportion of ambulance ePRs where dementia is recorded for patients aged ≥65 years, and to describe the frequency of recording in patients aged <65; to analyse discrepancies in the place of recording dementia on the ePR by comparing data from the new dementia tab and other sections of the ePR.

Results: We included 112,193 ePRs of patients aged ≥65 with ambulance attendance from a six-month period. The proportion with dementia recorded in patients aged ≥65 was 16.5%, increasing to 19.9% in patients aged ≥75, as compared to 13.5% (≥65) and 16.5% (≥75) in our previous audit. In this audit, of the 16.5% (n = 18,515) of records with dementia recorded, 69.9% (n = 12,939) used the dementia button and 25.4% (n = 4704) recorded text in the dementia tab. Dementia was recorded in ePR free-text fields (but not the dementia tab) in 29.7% of records. Eighteen other free-text fields were used in addition to, or instead of, the dementia tab, including the patient's social history, previous medical history and mental health. Dementia was present on the ePR of 0.4% (n = 461) of patients aged <65.

Conclusions: An ePR dementia tab enabled ambulance clinicians to standardise the location of recording dementia and may have facilitated increased recording. We would recommend other ambulance trusts capture this information in a specific section to improve information sharing and to inform care planning for this patient group.

导言:痴呆症是需要紧急救护服务的老年人的常见并发症,会影响临床决策和护理路径。在对痴呆症数据进行初步审核并征求员工意见后,救护车服务电子病历(ePR)中引入了专门记录痴呆症的部分(标签)。其中包括痴呆症诊断按钮和自由文本部分。我们旨在评估这一做法是否以及如何改进了记录工作:方法:重新审核对年龄≥65 岁的患者进行痴呆症记录的救护车电子病历比例,并描述对老年患者进行记录的频率:我们纳入了在 6 个月内有救护车出诊的 112,193 份年龄≥65 岁患者的电子病历。年龄≥65岁的患者中有痴呆症记录的比例为16.5%,年龄≥75岁的患者中这一比例增至19.9%,而在我们之前的审核中,这一比例分别为13.5%(≥65岁)和16.5%(≥75岁)。在本次审核中,16.5%(n = 18515)的痴呆记录中,69.9%(n = 12939)使用了痴呆按钮,25.4%(n = 4704)在痴呆选项卡中记录了文字。有 29.7% 的记录在 ePR 自由文本字段(但不是痴呆选项卡)中记录了痴呆。除痴呆选项卡外,还使用了其他 18 个自由文本字段,包括患者的社会病史、既往病史和精神健康状况。0.4%(n=461)的老年结论患者的电子病历中存在痴呆症:电子病历中的痴呆症选项卡使临床救护人员能够对痴呆症的记录位置进行标准化,并可能有助于增加记录。我们建议其他救护车托管机构在特定栏目中记录这一信息,以改善信息共享,并为这一患者群体的护理规划提供信息。
{"title":"Introduction of a section for recording dementia improves data capture on the ambulance electronic patient record: evidence from a regional quality improvement project.","authors":"Phil King, Patryk Jadzinski, Helen Pocock, Chloe Lofthouse-Jones, Martina Brown, Carole Fogg","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.29","DOIUrl":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.29","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dementia is a common co-morbidity in older people who require urgent or emergency ambulance attendance and influences clinical decisions and care pathways. Following an initial audit of dementia data and consultation with staff, a specific section (tab) to record dementia was introduced on an ambulance service electronic patient record (ePR). This includes a dementia diagnosis button and a free-text section. We aimed to assess whether and how this improved recording.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To re-audit the proportion of ambulance ePRs where dementia is recorded for patients aged ≥65 years, and to describe the frequency of recording in patients aged <65; to analyse discrepancies in the place of recording dementia on the ePR by comparing data from the new dementia tab and other sections of the ePR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 112,193 ePRs of patients aged ≥65 with ambulance attendance from a six-month period. The proportion with dementia recorded in patients aged ≥65 was 16.5%, increasing to 19.9% in patients aged ≥75, as compared to 13.5% (≥65) and 16.5% (≥75) in our previous audit. In this audit, of the 16.5% (n = 18,515) of records with dementia recorded, 69.9% (n = 12,939) used the dementia button and 25.4% (n = 4704) recorded text in the dementia tab. Dementia was recorded in ePR free-text fields (but not the dementia tab) in 29.7% of records. Eighteen other free-text fields were used in addition to, or instead of, the dementia tab, including the patient's social history, previous medical history and mental health. Dementia was present on the ePR of 0.4% (n = 461) of patients aged <65.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An ePR dementia tab enabled ambulance clinicians to standardise the location of recording dementia and may have facilitated increased recording. We would recommend other ambulance trusts capture this information in a specific section to improve information sharing and to inform care planning for this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376324/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The zero responder: a definition and report of current literature. 零反应者:定义和当前文献报告。
Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.38
Eloise Graham, John Hall, Keith Porter

The term 'zero responder' was initially devised in 2010 to describe those passing by or unharmed in a mass casualty incident, who provide life-saving care for injured persons before qualified professionals arrive. This review aims to determine how the literature defines the role of the zero responder and to explore how they can be better integrated into the emergency response. Current definitions of the zero responder in a medical setting were found through a literature search of several databases and online libraries using defined search terms. Additionally, a manual search of citations in included articles was performed to yield more results. In total, 16 papers defining the zero responder were included. These definitions were evaluated, and a revised definition was suggested to clarify the role in a medical setting relating to mass casualty incidents. The role of the zero responder can be facilitated through authority recognition and adequate equipment provision. Familiarisation with the term and role of zero responders among ambulance services is essential for effective collaboration. Further research and clarity on the integration of these two groups is necessary to facilitate effective and safe working between them.

零伤员 "一词最初出现于 2010 年,用于描述在大规模伤亡事件中路过或未受伤的人员,他们在合格的专业人员到达之前为伤员提供救生护理。本综述旨在确定文献如何定义 "零反应者 "的角色,并探讨如何将他们更好地融入应急响应。通过使用定义的检索词对多个数据库和在线图书馆进行文献检索,我们发现了目前在医疗环境中对 "零反应者 "的定义。此外,还对收录文章的引文进行了人工检索,以获得更多结果。总共收录了 16 篇定义零反应者的论文。我们对这些定义进行了评估,并提出了修订后的定义,以明确零反应人员在大规模伤亡事件医疗环境中的角色。通过权威机构的认可和提供充足的设备,可以促进零反应人员发挥作用。在救护车服务中熟悉零反应者的术语和角色对于有效合作至关重要。有必要进一步研究和明确这两个群体的整合,以促进他们之间有效和安全的工作。
{"title":"The zero responder: a definition and report of current literature.","authors":"Eloise Graham, John Hall, Keith Porter","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.38","DOIUrl":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.38","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term 'zero responder' was initially devised in 2010 to describe those passing by or unharmed in a mass casualty incident, who provide life-saving care for injured persons before qualified professionals arrive. This review aims to determine how the literature defines the role of the zero responder and to explore how they can be better integrated into the emergency response. Current definitions of the zero responder in a medical setting were found through a literature search of several databases and online libraries using defined search terms. Additionally, a manual search of citations in included articles was performed to yield more results. In total, 16 papers defining the zero responder were included. These definitions were evaluated, and a revised definition was suggested to clarify the role in a medical setting relating to mass casualty incidents. The role of the zero responder can be facilitated through authority recognition and adequate equipment provision. Familiarisation with the term and role of zero responders among ambulance services is essential for effective collaboration. Further research and clarity on the integration of these two groups is necessary to facilitate effective and safe working between them.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376322/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
College of Paramedics Research Conference 2024. 辅助医务人员学院 2024 年研究会议。
Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.44
{"title":"College of Paramedics Research Conference 2024.","authors":"","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.44","DOIUrl":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.44","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376326/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142157202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Influence of patient body weight on the probability of return of spontaneous circulation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an exploratory analysis. 病人体重对院外心脏骤停后自主循环恢复概率的影响:探索性分析。
Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.11
Michael W Hubble, Ginny R Kaplan, Melisa Martin

Introduction: In addition to key interventions, including bystander CPR and defibrillation, successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is also associated with several patient-level factors, including a shockable presenting rhythm, younger age, Caucasian race and female sex. An additional patient-level factor that may influence outcomes is patient weight, yet this attribute has not been extensively studied within the context of OHCA, despite globally increasing obesity rates.

Objective: To assess the relationship between patient weight and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during OHCA.

Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients from a national emergency medical services (EMS) patient record, with witnessed, non-traumatic OHCA prior to EMS arrival from January to December 2020. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patient weight and ROSC.

Results: Complete records were available for 9096 patients, of which 64.3% were males and 25.3% were ethnic minorities. The mean age of the participants was 65.01 years (SD = 15.8), with a mean weight of 93.52 kg (SD = 31.5). Altogether, 81.8% of arrests were of presumed cardiac aetiology and 30.3% presented with a shockable rhythm. Bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) shock were performed in 30.6% and 7.3% of cases, respectively, and 44.0% experienced ROSC. ROSC was less likely with patient weight >100 kg (OR = 0.709, p <0.001), male sex (OR = 0.782, p <0.001), and increasing age and EMS response time (OR = 0.994 per year, p <0.001 and OR = 0.970 per minute, p <0.001, respectively). Patients with shockable rhythms were more likely to achieve ROSC (OR = 1.790, p <0.001), as were patients receiving bystander CPR (OR = 1.170, p <0.001) and defibrillation prior to EMS arrival (OR = 1.658, p <0.001). Although the mean first adrenaline dose (mg/kg) followed a downward trend due to its non-weight-based dosing scheme, the mean total adrenaline dose administered to achieve ROSC demonstrated an upward linear trend of 0.05 mg for every 5 kg of body weight.

Conclusions: Patient weight was negatively associated with ROSC and positively associated with the total adrenaline dose required to attain ROSC.

导言:除了包括旁观者心肺复苏术和除颤在内的关键干预措施外,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的成功复苏还与几个患者层面的因素有关,包括可电击心律、年龄较小、白种人和女性。另外一个可能影响抢救结果的患者层面因素是患者体重,尽管肥胖率在全球范围内不断上升,但在 OHCA 的背景下,这一因素尚未得到广泛研究:评估患者体重与 OHCA 期间自发性循环恢复(ROSC)之间的关系:这项回顾性研究纳入了全国急救医疗服务(EMS)患者记录中的成年患者,这些患者在 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间,在急救医疗服务到达之前发生了有目击者在场的非创伤性 OHCA。研究采用逻辑回归法评估患者体重与 ROSC 之间的关系:共有 9096 名患者的完整记录,其中 64.3% 为男性,25.3% 为少数民族。参与者的平均年龄为 65.01 岁(SD = 15.8),平均体重为 93.52 千克(SD = 31.5)。81.8%的心跳骤停推测为心脏原因,30.3%的心跳骤停表现为可电击心律。旁观者心肺复苏和自动体外除颤器(AED)电击的比例分别为 30.6% 和 7.3%,44.0% 的患者获得了 ROSC。体重大于 100 千克的患者出现 ROSC 的几率较低(OR = 0.709,P 结论:体重大于 100 千克的患者出现 ROSC 的几率较低):患者体重与 ROSC 呈负相关,与达到 ROSC 所需的肾上腺素总剂量呈正相关。
{"title":"Influence of patient body weight on the probability of return of spontaneous circulation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an exploratory analysis.","authors":"Michael W Hubble, Ginny R Kaplan, Melisa Martin","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.11","DOIUrl":"10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.11","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In addition to key interventions, including bystander CPR and defibrillation, successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is also associated with several patient-level factors, including a shockable presenting rhythm, younger age, Caucasian race and female sex. An additional patient-level factor that may influence outcomes is patient weight, yet this attribute has not been extensively studied within the context of OHCA, despite globally increasing obesity rates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the relationship between patient weight and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) during OHCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included adult patients from a national emergency medical services (EMS) patient record, with witnessed, non-traumatic OHCA prior to EMS arrival from January to December 2020. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patient weight and ROSC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete records were available for 9096 patients, of which 64.3% were males and 25.3% were ethnic minorities. The mean age of the participants was 65.01 years (SD = 15.8), with a mean weight of 93.52 kg (SD = 31.5). Altogether, 81.8% of arrests were of presumed cardiac aetiology and 30.3% presented with a shockable rhythm. Bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator (AED) shock were performed in 30.6% and 7.3% of cases, respectively, and 44.0% experienced ROSC. ROSC was less likely with patient weight >100 kg (OR = 0.709, p <0.001), male sex (OR = 0.782, p <0.001), and increasing age and EMS response time (OR = 0.994 per year, p <0.001 and OR = 0.970 per minute, p <0.001, respectively). Patients with shockable rhythms were more likely to achieve ROSC (OR = 1.790, p <0.001), as were patients receiving bystander CPR (OR = 1.170, p <0.001) and defibrillation prior to EMS arrival (OR = 1.658, p <0.001). Although the mean first adrenaline dose (mg/kg) followed a downward trend due to its non-weight-based dosing scheme, the mean total adrenaline dose administered to achieve ROSC demonstrated an upward linear trend of 0.05 mg for every 5 kg of body weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient weight was negatively associated with ROSC and positively associated with the total adrenaline dose required to attain ROSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376325/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stroke survivor views on ambulance redirection as a strategy to increase access to thrombectomy in England 英国中风幸存者对救护车改道作为增加血栓切除术机会的策略的看法
Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.1
Abi Alton, Darren Flynn, David Burgess, Gary A. Ford, Chris Price, Martin James, Peter McMeekin, Michael Allen, Lisa Shaw, Philip White
Introduction: Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are effective time-sensitive treatments for selected cases of acute ischaemic stroke. While thrombolysis is widely available, thrombectomy can only be provided at facilities with the necessary equipment and interventionists. Suitable patients admitted to other hospitals require secondary transfer, causing delays to treatment. Pre-hospital ambulance redirection to thrombectomy facilities may improve access but treatment eligibility cannot be confirmed pre-hospital. Some redirected patients would travel further and be displaced without receiving thrombectomy. This study aimed to elicit stroke survivor and carer/relative views about the possible consequences of introducing a conceptual, idealised ambulance redirection pathway.Methods: Focus groups were undertaken using a topic guide describing four hypothetical ambulance redirection scenarios and their possible consequences: earlier treatment with thrombectomy; delayed diagnosis of non-stroke ‘mimic’ conditions; delayed thrombolysis treatment; and delayed diagnosis of haemorrhagic stroke. Meetings were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and data analysed thematically using emergent coding.Results: Fifteen stroke survivors and carers/relatives participated in three focus groups. There was wide acceptance of possible low-risk consequences of ambulance redirection, including extended travel time, being further from home and experiencing longer hospital stays. Participants were more uncertain about higher-risk consequences, including delays in diagnosis/treatment for patients unsuitable for thrombectomy, but remained positive about ambulance redirection overall. Participants rationalised acceptance of higher-risk consequences by recognising that redirected patients would still access appropriate treatment, even if delayed. In addition, acceptance of ambulance redirection would be increased if there were robust clinical evidence showing net benefit over secondary transfer pathways.Conclusions: Participant views were generally supportive of ambulance redirection to facilitate access to thrombectomy. Further research is needed to demonstrate overall benefit in an NHS context.
导言:静脉溶栓和机械性血栓切除术是针对特定急性缺血性中风病例的有效、时效性强的治疗方法。虽然溶栓治疗可广泛使用,但血栓切除术只能在具备必要设备和介入专家的机构进行。其他医院收治的合适患者需要二次转院,导致治疗延误。院前救护车将患者转送至血栓切除术机构可改善患者的就医条件,但治疗资格无法在院前得到确认。一些被转送的患者会走得更远,在没有接受血栓切除术的情况下被转移。本研究旨在了解中风幸存者和照护者/亲属对引入概念化、理想化的救护车转送路径可能造成的后果的看法:方法: 使用主题指南开展焦点小组讨论,该指南描述了四种假设的救护车转送情景及其可能的后果:提早进行血栓切除术治疗;延迟诊断非中风 "模拟 "病症;延迟溶栓治疗;延迟诊断出血性中风。对会议进行了录音、逐字记录,并使用突发编码对数据进行了主题分析:15 名中风幸存者和照护者/亲属参加了三个焦点小组。大家普遍接受救护车改道可能带来的低风险后果,包括延长旅行时间、离家更远以及住院时间更长。对于较高风险后果,包括不适合进行血栓切除术的患者的诊断/治疗延误,参与者较为不确定,但总体上对救护车转运仍持肯定态度。与会者认为,即使延误,被转送的患者仍可获得适当的治疗,从而合理地接受了较高风险后果。此外,如果有确凿的临床证据显示救护车转运比二次转运途径更有净效益,那么参与者对救护车转运的接受度会更高:与会者普遍支持通过救护车转运来促进血栓切除术的实施。需要开展进一步研究,以证明在国家医疗服务体系中的整体效益。
{"title":"Stroke survivor views on ambulance redirection as a strategy to increase access to thrombectomy in England","authors":"Abi Alton, Darren Flynn, David Burgess, Gary A. Ford, Chris Price, Martin James, Peter McMeekin, Michael Allen, Lisa Shaw, Philip White","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are effective time-sensitive treatments for selected cases of acute ischaemic stroke. While thrombolysis is widely available, thrombectomy can only be provided at facilities with the necessary equipment and interventionists.\u0000 Suitable patients admitted to other hospitals require secondary transfer, causing delays to treatment. Pre-hospital ambulance redirection to thrombectomy facilities may improve access but treatment eligibility cannot be confirmed pre-hospital. Some redirected patients would travel further\u0000 and be displaced without receiving thrombectomy. This study aimed to elicit stroke survivor and carer/relative views about the possible consequences of introducing a conceptual, idealised ambulance redirection pathway.Methods: Focus groups were undertaken using a topic guide describing\u0000 four hypothetical ambulance redirection scenarios and their possible consequences: earlier treatment with thrombectomy; delayed diagnosis of non-stroke ‘mimic’ conditions; delayed thrombolysis treatment; and delayed diagnosis of haemorrhagic stroke. Meetings were audio recorded,\u0000 transcribed verbatim and data analysed thematically using emergent coding.Results: Fifteen stroke survivors and carers/relatives participated in three focus groups. There was wide acceptance of possible low-risk consequences of ambulance redirection, including extended travel time,\u0000 being further from home and experiencing longer hospital stays. Participants were more uncertain about higher-risk consequences, including delays in diagnosis/treatment for patients unsuitable for thrombectomy, but remained positive about ambulance redirection overall. Participants rationalised\u0000 acceptance of higher-risk consequences by recognising that redirected patients would still access appropriate treatment, even if delayed. In addition, acceptance of ambulance redirection would be increased if there were robust clinical evidence showing net benefit over secondary transfer pathways.Conclusions:\u0000 Participant views were generally supportive of ambulance redirection to facilitate access to thrombectomy. Further research is needed to demonstrate overall benefit in an NHS context.","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141234022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool 重大创伤分诊工具研究 (MATTS) 专家共识衍生的损伤评估工具
Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.10
Gordon Fuller, Nathan Howes, Roderick Mackenzie, S. Keating, Janette Turner, Christopher Holt, Joshua Miller, Steve Goodacre
Introduction: Major trauma centre (MTC) care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. English ambulance services and trauma networks currently use a range of triage tools to select patients for bypass to MTCs. A standardised national triage tool may improve triage accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the reproducibility of decision-making.Methods: We conducted an expert consensus process to derive and develop a major trauma triage tool for use in English trauma networks. A web-based Delphi survey was conducted to identify and confirm candidate triage tool predictors of major trauma. Facilitated roundtable consensus meetings were convened to confirm the proposed triage tool’s purpose, target diagnostic threshold, scope, intended population and structure, as well as the individual triage tool predictors and cut points. Public and patient involvement (PPI) focus groups were held to ensure triage tool acceptability to service users.Results: The Delphi survey reached consensus on nine triage variables in two domains, from 109 candidate variables after three rounds. Following a review of the relevant evidence during the consensus meetings, iterative rounds of discussion achieved consensus on the following aspects of the triage tool: reference standard, scope, target diagnostic accuracy and intended population. A three-step tool comprising physiology, anatomical injury and clinical judgement domains, with triage variables assessed in parallel, was recommended. The triage tool was received favourably by PPI focus groups.Conclusions: This paper presents a new expert consensus derived major trauma triage tool with defined purpose, scope, intended population, structure, constituent variables, variable definitions and thresholds. Prospective evaluation is required to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness, acceptability and usability.
导言:主要创伤中心(MTC)护理与改善受伤病人的治疗效果有关。英国的救护车服务和创伤网络目前使用一系列分流工具来选择将病人分流到重创中心。标准化的全国分诊工具可以提高分诊的准确性、成本效益和决策的可重复性:方法:我们开展了一项专家共识程序,以推导和开发供英国创伤网络使用的重大创伤分流工具。我们开展了一项基于网络的德尔菲调查,以确定并确认候选分诊工具的重大创伤预测指标。召开圆桌共识会议,以确认拟议分诊工具的目的、目标诊断阈值、范围、目标人群和结构,以及各个分诊工具预测因子和切点。此外,还举行了公众和患者参与(PPI)焦点小组会议,以确保服务用户对分流工具的可接受性:德尔菲调查从 109 个候选变量中筛选出两个领域的九个分流变量,经过三轮调查后达成了共识。在共识会议期间对相关证据进行审查后,经过反复讨论,就分诊工具的以下方面达成了共识:参考标准、范围、目标诊断准确性和目标人群。会议建议采用一种三步式工具,包括生理、解剖损伤和临床判断领域,并同时评估分诊变量。分诊工具得到了公众宣传焦点小组的好评:本文介绍了一种新的专家共识衍生的重大创伤分流工具,该工具具有明确的目的、范围、目标人群、结构、组成变量、变量定义和阈值。需要进行前瞻性评估,以确定临床和成本效益、可接受性和可用性。
{"title":"Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool","authors":"Gordon Fuller, Nathan Howes, Roderick Mackenzie, S. Keating, Janette Turner, Christopher Holt, Joshua Miller, Steve Goodacre","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.10","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Major trauma centre (MTC) care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. English ambulance services and trauma networks currently use a range of triage tools to select patients for bypass to MTCs. A standardised national triage tool may improve\u0000 triage accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the reproducibility of decision-making.Methods: We conducted an expert consensus process to derive and develop a major trauma triage tool for use in English trauma networks. A web-based Delphi survey was conducted to identify and confirm candidate\u0000 triage tool predictors of major trauma. Facilitated roundtable consensus meetings were convened to confirm the proposed triage tool’s purpose, target diagnostic threshold, scope, intended population and structure, as well as the individual triage tool predictors and cut points. Public\u0000 and patient involvement (PPI) focus groups were held to ensure triage tool acceptability to service users.Results: The Delphi survey reached consensus on nine triage variables in two domains, from 109 candidate variables after three rounds. Following a review of the relevant evidence\u0000 during the consensus meetings, iterative rounds of discussion achieved consensus on the following aspects of the triage tool: reference standard, scope, target diagnostic accuracy and intended population. A three-step tool comprising physiology, anatomical injury and clinical judgement domains,\u0000 with triage variables assessed in parallel, was recommended. The triage tool was received favourably by PPI focus groups.Conclusions: This paper presents a new expert consensus derived major trauma triage tool with defined purpose, scope, intended population, structure, constituent\u0000 variables, variable definitions and thresholds. Prospective evaluation is required to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness, acceptability and usability.","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141235093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is the Calgary-Cambridge Model of consultation a suitable communication tool for students and newly qualified paramedics? A qualitative study 卡尔加里-剑桥咨询模式是否是适合学生和新晋护理人员的沟通工具?定性研究
Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.23
Claire Hastings
Introduction: The Calgary-Cambridge Model (C-CM), developed by Kurtz and Silverman in 1996, is a communication tool developed for doctors. Since its publication, it has been adopted by various healthcare professionals; however, no previous research has been identified that evaluates its use in paramedic practice. This study aims to explore the experience of students and newly qualified paramedics (NQPs) applying the C-CM in practice, and establish their experiences and perceptions of its suitability as a communication tool in the pre-hospital environment.Methods: This MSc research project, conducted in April‐May 2021, applied qualitative methods with thematic analysis to written reflections and semi-structured interview transcripts discussing the implementation of C-CM in paramedic practice. A convenience-quota sample of 11 participants, consisting of third-year paramedic students and recent NQPs, were recruited. This research is reported using Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) reporting guidelines.Results: Eleven participants were recruited in total; nine consented to reflective writing analysis and interviews, two consented to writing analysis only. Analysis of the writing samples allowed for a deductive approach to the interview plan. Participants consisted of seven males and four females. All eleven participants (ten British and one Indian) spoke English as a first language. Ages ranged from 18 to 59 years. Career status was 46.2% third-year students and 53.8% NQPs. Four major themes were identified: barriers to implementation of the C-CM in practice; impact of C-CM on paramedic practice; C-CM as a teaching and learning tool in paramedic practice; and adaptation of C-CM for paramedic practice.Conclusions: Participants suggested that implementation of C-CM leads to improved structure and shared decision-making; however, adaptions to make it more paramedic-focused would be welcomed. The diversity of patients and their preferences can make its implementation challenging, and the negative feedback received from experienced ambulance staff was a significant concern to participants.
简介卡尔加里-剑桥模式(C-CM)由 Kurtz 和 Silverman 于 1996 年开发,是一种针对医生的沟通工具。自其发布以来,已被各种医疗保健专业人士所采用;然而,此前尚未发现有研究对其在辅助医务人员实践中的使用情况进行评估。本研究旨在探讨学生和新获得资格的辅助医务人员(NQPs)在实践中应用 C-CM 的经验,并确定他们对 C-CM 作为院前环境中沟通工具的适用性的体验和看法:本理学硕士研究项目于 2021 年 4 月至 5 月进行,采用定性方法,对讨论辅助医务人员在实践中实施 C-CM 的书面反思和半结构式访谈记录进行主题分析。本研究采用方便配额抽样法,招募了 11 名参与者,包括三年级护理专业学生和新近获得国家资格证书的人员。本研究采用定性研究综合报告标准(COREQ)报告指南进行报告:共招募了 11 名参与者,其中 9 人同意进行反思性写作分析和访谈,2 人只同意进行写作分析。通过对写作样本的分析,可以对访谈计划进行演绎。参与者包括七名男性和四名女性。所有 11 名参与者(10 名英国人和 1 名印度人)的第一语言都是英语。年龄从 18 岁到 59 岁不等。职业状况为 46.2% 的三年级学生和 53.8% 的 NQPs。研究确定了四大主题:在实践中实施 C-CM 的障碍;C-CM 对辅助医疗实践的影响;C-CM 作为辅助医疗实践中的教学工具;C-CM 在辅助医疗实践中的适应性:与会者认为,C-CM 的实施改善了结构和共同决策;但是,他们欢迎对其进行调整,使其更加以辅助医务人员为重点。患者及其偏好的多样性可能会使其实施具有挑战性,经验丰富的救护人员提供的负面反馈也是与会者非常关注的问题。
{"title":"Is the Calgary-Cambridge Model of consultation a suitable communication tool for students and newly qualified paramedics? A qualitative study","authors":"Claire Hastings","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.23","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Calgary-Cambridge Model (C-CM), developed by Kurtz and Silverman in 1996, is a communication tool developed for doctors. Since its publication, it has been adopted by various healthcare professionals; however, no previous research has been identified that evaluates\u0000 its use in paramedic practice. This study aims to explore the experience of students and newly qualified paramedics (NQPs) applying the C-CM in practice, and establish their experiences and perceptions of its suitability as a communication tool in the pre-hospital environment.Methods:\u0000 This MSc research project, conducted in April‐May 2021, applied qualitative methods with thematic analysis to written reflections and semi-structured interview transcripts discussing the implementation of C-CM in paramedic practice. A convenience-quota sample of 11 participants, consisting\u0000 of third-year paramedic students and recent NQPs, were recruited. This research is reported using Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) reporting guidelines.Results: Eleven participants were recruited in total; nine consented to reflective writing analysis\u0000 and interviews, two consented to writing analysis only. Analysis of the writing samples allowed for a deductive approach to the interview plan. Participants consisted of seven males and four females. All eleven participants (ten British and one Indian) spoke English as a first language. Ages\u0000 ranged from 18 to 59 years. Career status was 46.2% third-year students and 53.8% NQPs. Four major themes were identified: barriers to implementation of the C-CM in practice; impact of C-CM on paramedic practice; C-CM as a teaching and learning tool in paramedic practice; and adaptation of\u0000 C-CM for paramedic practice.Conclusions: Participants suggested that implementation of C-CM leads to improved structure and shared decision-making; however, adaptions to make it more paramedic-focused would be welcomed. The diversity of patients and their preferences can make its\u0000 implementation challenging, and the negative feedback received from experienced ambulance staff was a significant concern to participants.","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141233346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ambulance service recognition of health inequalities and activities for reduction: An evidence and gap map of the published literature 救护车服务对健康不平等的认识和减少不平等的活动:已发表文献的证据和差距图
Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.47
Fiona Bell, Ruth Crabtree, Caitlin Wilson, E. Miller, Rachel Byrne
Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) are often patients’ first point of contact for urgent and emergency care needs. Patients are triaged over the phone and may receive an ambulance response, with potential conveyance to the hospital. A recent scoping review suggested disparities in EMS patient care in the United States. However, it is unknown how health inequalities impact EMS care in other developed countries and how inequalities are being addressed.Objectives: This rapid evidence map of published literature aims to map known health inequalities in EMS patients and describe interventions reducing health inequalities in EMS patient care.Methods: The search strategy consisted of EMS synonyms and health inequality synonyms. The MEDLINE/PubMed database was searched from 1 January 2010 to 26 July 2022. Studies were included if they described empirical research exploring health inequalities within ambulance service patient care. Studies were mapped on to the EMS care interventions framework and Core20PLUS5 framework. Studies evaluating interventions were synthesised using the United Kingdom Allied Health Professions Public Health Strategic Framework.Results: The search strategy yielded 771 articles, excluding duplicates, with two more studies added from hand searches. One hundred studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review. Inequalities in EMS patient care were predominantly situated in assessment, treatment and conveyance, although triage and response performance were also represented. Studies mostly explored EMS health inequalities within ethnic minority populations, populations with protected characteristics and the core issue of social deprivation. Studies evaluating interventions reducing health inequalities (n = 5) were from outside the United Kingdom and focused on older patients, ethnic minorities and those with limited English proficiency. Interventions included community paramedics, awareness campaigns, dedicated language lines and changes to EMS protocols.Conclusions: Further UK-based research exploring health inequalities of EMS patients would support ambulance service policy and intervention development to reduce health inequality in urgent and emergency care delivery.
背景:急诊医疗服务(EMS)通常是病人需要紧急护理时的第一个接触点。患者通过电话进行分诊,可能会得到救护车的响应,并有可能被送往医院。最近的一项范围审查表明,美国的急救医疗服务(EMS)患者护理存在差异。然而,在其他发达国家,健康不平等是如何影响急救医疗服务的,以及如何解决不平等问题,目前尚不得而知:这份已发表文献的快速证据图旨在绘制已知的急救病人健康不平等现象图,并描述减少急救病人护理中健康不平等现象的干预措施:搜索策略包括急救服务同义词和健康不平等同义词。检索时间为 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 26 日的 MEDLINE/PubMed 数据库。凡是对救护车服务患者护理中的健康不平等现象进行实证研究的研究均被纳入。研究结果与急救服务护理干预框架和 Core20PLUS5 框架相对应。使用英国联合卫生专业公共卫生战略框架对评估干预措施的研究进行综合:该搜索策略共搜索到 771 篇文章,排除了重复的文章,另外还通过人工搜索增加了两项研究。经全文审阅后,100 项研究符合纳入标准。急救病人护理中的不平等主要体现在评估、治疗和转运方面,尽管分流和响应性能也有体现。大多数研究都探讨了少数民族人群、受保护特征人群以及社会贫困这一核心问题中的急救医疗服务健康不平等现象。对减少健康不平等的干预措施进行评估的研究(n = 5)来自英国以外,主要针对老年患者、少数民族和英语水平有限的人群。干预措施包括社区辅助医务人员、宣传活动、语言专线和改变急救协议:以英国为基础,对急救医疗服务患者的健康不平等现象进行进一步研究,将有助于制定救护服务政策和干预措施,减少紧急和急诊医疗服务中的健康不平等现象。
{"title":"Ambulance service recognition of health inequalities and activities for reduction: An evidence and gap map of the published literature","authors":"Fiona Bell, Ruth Crabtree, Caitlin Wilson, E. Miller, Rachel Byrne","doi":"10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.47","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.47","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) are often patients’ first point of contact for urgent and emergency care needs. Patients are triaged over the phone and may receive an ambulance response, with potential conveyance to the hospital. A recent scoping review suggested\u0000 disparities in EMS patient care in the United States. However, it is unknown how health inequalities impact EMS care in other developed countries and how inequalities are being addressed.Objectives: This rapid evidence map of published literature aims to map known health inequalities\u0000 in EMS patients and describe interventions reducing health inequalities in EMS patient care.Methods: The search strategy consisted of EMS synonyms and health inequality synonyms. The MEDLINE/PubMed database was searched from 1 January 2010 to 26 July 2022. Studies were included\u0000 if they described empirical research exploring health inequalities within ambulance service patient care. Studies were mapped on to the EMS care interventions framework and Core20PLUS5 framework. Studies evaluating interventions were synthesised using the United Kingdom Allied Health Professions\u0000 Public Health Strategic Framework.Results: The search strategy yielded 771 articles, excluding duplicates, with two more studies added from hand searches. One hundred studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review. Inequalities in EMS patient care were predominantly situated\u0000 in assessment, treatment and conveyance, although triage and response performance were also represented. Studies mostly explored EMS health inequalities within ethnic minority populations, populations with protected characteristics and the core issue of social deprivation. Studies evaluating\u0000 interventions reducing health inequalities (n = 5) were from outside the United Kingdom and focused on older patients, ethnic minorities and those with limited English proficiency. Interventions included community paramedics, awareness campaigns, dedicated language lines and changes to EMS\u0000 protocols.Conclusions: Further UK-based research exploring health inequalities of EMS patients would support ambulance service policy and intervention development to reduce health inequality in urgent and emergency care delivery.","PeriodicalId":72470,"journal":{"name":"British paramedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141230046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
British paramedic journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1