[Effectiveness on adherence to biological drugs and experience of a pharmaceutical intervention based on CMO model in patients with rheumatic disease (AdhER-2 study)].
A Caso-González, J Núñez-Rodríguez, Y González-Pérez, C Leralta-González, V Sanz-Alonso, C Obaldia-Alaña
{"title":"[Effectiveness on adherence to biological drugs and experience of a pharmaceutical intervention based on CMO model in patients with rheumatic disease (AdhER-2 study)].","authors":"A Caso-González, J Núñez-Rodríguez, Y González-Pérez, C Leralta-González, V Sanz-Alonso, C Obaldia-Alaña","doi":"10.23938/ASSN.1004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to assess the effectiveness on adherence to treatment with biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b-DMARD) and experience with providers of healthcare of a CMO pharmaceutical intervention care model in subjects with rheu-matoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis stratified according to their needs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Prospective, single-centre randomized controlled study. The study period was eleven months. Non-compliant patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondy-litis treated with b-DMARD were included. Patients were randomized to a control (CG) or intervention group (IG) who received regular or the CMO pharmaceutical intervention model treatment, respec-tively. Baseline and final adherence were determined using medication possession ratio, the Compliance Questionnaire on Rheu-matology, and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. To assess baseline and final patient experience with providers of healthcare we applied the Chronic Patient Experience Assessment Instrument (IEXPAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the IG, one patient (5.6%) was categorized as priority 1, nine (50.0%) as priority 2, and eight (44.4%) as priority 3. Ninety pharmaceutical interventions were carried out (5.1±1.8 interventions / patient). At the end of the study, the IG showed higher fre-quency of patients who adhered to the pharmaceutical intervention (77.8 vs 18.8%; p=0.002) and higher mean IEXPAC score (7.6±1.3 vs 5.8±1.1; p <0.001) in comparison to the CG. Conclusion The CMO pharmaceutical intervention model significantly improves patient adherence to b-DMARD and their experience with the providers of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":7775,"journal":{"name":"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/6c/assn-45-02-e1004.PMC10130795.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Background: We aimed to assess the effectiveness on adherence to treatment with biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b-DMARD) and experience with providers of healthcare of a CMO pharmaceutical intervention care model in subjects with rheu-matoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis stratified according to their needs.
Method: Prospective, single-centre randomized controlled study. The study period was eleven months. Non-compliant patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondy-litis treated with b-DMARD were included. Patients were randomized to a control (CG) or intervention group (IG) who received regular or the CMO pharmaceutical intervention model treatment, respec-tively. Baseline and final adherence were determined using medication possession ratio, the Compliance Questionnaire on Rheu-matology, and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale. To assess baseline and final patient experience with providers of healthcare we applied the Chronic Patient Experience Assessment Instrument (IEXPAC).
Results: For the IG, one patient (5.6%) was categorized as priority 1, nine (50.0%) as priority 2, and eight (44.4%) as priority 3. Ninety pharmaceutical interventions were carried out (5.1±1.8 interventions / patient). At the end of the study, the IG showed higher fre-quency of patients who adhered to the pharmaceutical intervention (77.8 vs 18.8%; p=0.002) and higher mean IEXPAC score (7.6±1.3 vs 5.8±1.1; p <0.001) in comparison to the CG. Conclusion The CMO pharmaceutical intervention model significantly improves patient adherence to b-DMARD and their experience with the providers of healthcare.
背景:我们旨在评估生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(b-DMARD)治疗依从性的有效性,以及医疗保健提供者对类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者的CMO药物干预护理模式的经验。方法:前瞻性、单中心随机对照研究。研究期为11个月。采用b-DMARD治疗的类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎的非依从性患者被纳入研究。将患者随机分为对照组(CG)和干预组(IG),分别接受常规和CMO药物干预模式治疗。采用药物占有率、风湿病依从性问卷和Morisky药物依从性量表确定基线和最终依从性。为了评估患者与医疗保健提供者的基线和最终体验,我们应用了慢性患者体验评估工具(IEXPAC)。结果:在IG中,1例患者(5.6%)被分类为优先级1,9例(50.0%)被分类为优先级2,8例(44.4%)被分类为优先级3。共进行药物干预90次(5.1±1.8次/例)。在研究结束时,IG显示坚持药物干预的患者频率更高(77.8 vs 18.8%;p=0.002)和更高的平均IEXPAC评分(7.6±1.3 vs 5.8±1.1;p
期刊介绍:
La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es una revista de contenido médico sanitario de carácter generalista. En ella tienen cabida artículos referidos a temas de salud/enfermedad en general, salud pública, administración y gestión sanitaria y Atención Primaria de salud.