Reliability of a Wearable Motion System for Clinical Evaluation of Dynamic Lumbar Spine Function.

Hamed Hani, Reid Souchereau, Anas Kachlan, Halle Harris, Jonathan Dufour, Alexander Aurand, Prasath Mageswaran, Madison Hyer, William Marras
{"title":"Reliability of a Wearable Motion System for Clinical Evaluation of Dynamic Lumbar Spine Function.","authors":"Hamed Hani, Reid Souchereau, Anas Kachlan, Halle Harris, Jonathan Dufour, Alexander Aurand, Prasath Mageswaran, Madison Hyer, William Marras","doi":"10.31031/acam.2022.07.000660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Subjective assessments are often used to assess extent of functional limitations and treatment response. However, these measures have poor sensitivity and are influenced by the patient's perception of their condition. Currently, there are no objective tools to effectively assess the extent of an individual's functional disability and inform clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a wearable motion system based on Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors for use in quantifying low back function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Low back motion assessments were conducted by 3 novice raters on 20 participants using an IMU-based motion system. These assessments were conducted over 3 days with 2 days of rest in between tests. A total of 37 kinematic parameters were extracted from the low back motion assessment in all three anatomical planes. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) calculated from repeated measures, mixed-effects regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lumbar spine-specific kinematic parameters showed moderate to excellent reliability across all kinematic parameters. The ICC values ranged between 0.84-0.93 for intra-rater reliability and 0.66 - 0.83 for inter-rater reliability. In particular, velocity measures showed higher reliabilities than other kinematic variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IMU-based wearable motion system is a valid and reliable tool to objectively assess low back function. This study demonstrated that lumbar spine-specific kinematic metrics have the potential to provide good, repeatable metrics to assess clinical function over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":72088,"journal":{"name":"Advances in complementary & alternative medicine","volume":"7 2","pages":"672-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9934370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in complementary & alternative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/acam.2022.07.000660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Subjective assessments are often used to assess extent of functional limitations and treatment response. However, these measures have poor sensitivity and are influenced by the patient's perception of their condition. Currently, there are no objective tools to effectively assess the extent of an individual's functional disability and inform clinical decision-making.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a wearable motion system based on Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensors for use in quantifying low back function.

Methods: Low back motion assessments were conducted by 3 novice raters on 20 participants using an IMU-based motion system. These assessments were conducted over 3 days with 2 days of rest in between tests. A total of 37 kinematic parameters were extracted from the low back motion assessment in all three anatomical planes. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) calculated from repeated measures, mixed-effects regression models.

Results: Lumbar spine-specific kinematic parameters showed moderate to excellent reliability across all kinematic parameters. The ICC values ranged between 0.84-0.93 for intra-rater reliability and 0.66 - 0.83 for inter-rater reliability. In particular, velocity measures showed higher reliabilities than other kinematic variables.

Conclusion: The IMU-based wearable motion system is a valid and reliable tool to objectively assess low back function. This study demonstrated that lumbar spine-specific kinematic metrics have the potential to provide good, repeatable metrics to assess clinical function over time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于动态腰椎功能临床评估的可穿戴运动系统的可靠性
背景:腰背痛是导致全球残疾的主要原因。主观评估通常用于评估功能受限程度和治疗反应。然而,这些测量方法的灵敏度较低,而且受到患者对自身病情看法的影响。目前,还没有客观的工具来有效评估个人的功能障碍程度并为临床决策提供依据:本研究旨在评估基于惯性测量单元(IMU)传感器的可穿戴运动系统用于量化腰背功能的可靠性:由 3 名新手评定员使用基于 IMU 的运动系统对 20 名参与者进行腰背运动评估。这些评估为期 3 天,两次测试之间休息 2 天。从所有三个解剖平面的腰背运动评估中共提取了 37 个运动学参数。使用重复测量混合效应回归模型计算出的类内相关系数(ICC)对评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性进行了评估:结果:在所有运动学参数中,腰椎特定运动学参数显示出中等至极佳的可靠性。评分者内部可靠性的 ICC 值介于 0.84-0.93 之间,评分者之间的可靠性介于 0.66-0.83 之间。结论:基于 IMU 的可穿戴运动系统在运动学方面具有很高的可靠性:结论:基于 IMU 的可穿戴运动系统是客观评估腰背功能的有效而可靠的工具。这项研究表明,腰椎特定的运动学指标有可能提供良好的、可重复的指标,以评估一段时间内的临床功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliability of a Wearable Motion System for Clinical Evaluation of Dynamic Lumbar Spine Function. Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate Blended Material for Dentistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1