Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Irrigant Solutions Using a Novel Biofilm Model: An In Vitro Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Experiment.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2419Virdee09
S S Virdee, F S Albaaj, M M Grant, D Walmsley, J Camilleri, P R Cooper, P L Tomson
{"title":"Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Irrigant Solutions Using a Novel Biofilm Model: An In Vitro Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Experiment.","authors":"S S Virdee,&nbsp;F S Albaaj,&nbsp;M M Grant,&nbsp;D Walmsley,&nbsp;J Camilleri,&nbsp;P R Cooper,&nbsp;P L Tomson","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2419Virdee09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the ability of different irrigation solutions to biomechanically remove Enterococcus faecalis biofilm from a novel artificial root canal model during chemomechanical preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>High resolution micro-computer-tomography scans of a mandibular molar's mesial root were used to produce 50 identical 3D-printed resin root canal models. These were cultured with E.faecalis over seven days to generate biofilm and subjected to chemomechanical preparation using: saline; 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) alongside positive/negative controls (n = 10). Canals were prepared to 40/.06 taper, with 1 mL irrigation between instruments, followed by 5 mL penultimate rinse, 30 s ultrasonic activation and 5 mL final rinse. Residual biofilm volume (pixels) was determined following immunofluorescent staining and confocal-laser-scanning-microscopy imaging. Statistical comparisons were made using Kruskal-Wallis with post-hoc Dunn's tests (α ⟨0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all canal thirds, the greatest biofilm removal was observed with NaOCl, followed by EDTA and saline. The latter had significantly higher E.faecalis counts than NaOCl and EDTA (P ⟨0.01). However, no statistical differences were found between EDTA and NaOCl or saline and positive controls (P ⟩0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within limitations of this model, 17% EDTA was found to be as effective as 2% NaOCl at eradicating E.faecalis biofilm following chemomechanical preparation. Further investigations with multi-species biofilms are encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2419Virdee09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To determine the ability of different irrigation solutions to biomechanically remove Enterococcus faecalis biofilm from a novel artificial root canal model during chemomechanical preparation.

Methods: High resolution micro-computer-tomography scans of a mandibular molar's mesial root were used to produce 50 identical 3D-printed resin root canal models. These were cultured with E.faecalis over seven days to generate biofilm and subjected to chemomechanical preparation using: saline; 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) alongside positive/negative controls (n = 10). Canals were prepared to 40/.06 taper, with 1 mL irrigation between instruments, followed by 5 mL penultimate rinse, 30 s ultrasonic activation and 5 mL final rinse. Residual biofilm volume (pixels) was determined following immunofluorescent staining and confocal-laser-scanning-microscopy imaging. Statistical comparisons were made using Kruskal-Wallis with post-hoc Dunn's tests (α ⟨0.05).

Results: In all canal thirds, the greatest biofilm removal was observed with NaOCl, followed by EDTA and saline. The latter had significantly higher E.faecalis counts than NaOCl and EDTA (P ⟨0.01). However, no statistical differences were found between EDTA and NaOCl or saline and positive controls (P ⟩0.05).

Conclusions: Within limitations of this model, 17% EDTA was found to be as effective as 2% NaOCl at eradicating E.faecalis biofilm following chemomechanical preparation. Further investigations with multi-species biofilms are encouraged.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用新型生物膜模型的不同冲洗液的抗菌效果:体外共聚焦激光扫描显微镜实验。
目的:研究不同灌洗液在化学力学制备过程中去除新型人工根管模型粪肠球菌生物膜的能力。方法:采用高分辨率显微计算机断层扫描下颌磨牙近中根,制作50个相同的3d打印树脂根管模型。将这些细胞与粪肠杆菌一起培养7天以产生生物膜,并使用生理盐水进行化学机械制备;17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)或2%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)与阳性/阴性对照(n = 10)。运河准备到40/ /。6锥度,仪器间灌洗1ml,第二次冲洗5ml,超声活化30s,最后冲洗5ml。通过免疫荧光染色和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜成像,确定剩余生物膜体积(像素)。采用Kruskal-Wallis和事后Dunn检验进行统计学比较(α⟨0.05)。结果:在所有三分之一的管中,NaOCl的生物膜去除效果最好,其次是EDTA和生理盐水。后者粪肠球菌计数显著高于NaOCl和EDTA (P⟨0.01)。然而,EDTA和NaOCl或生理盐水和阳性对照之间没有发现统计学差异(P⟩0.05)。结论:在该模型的限制下,在化学机械制备后,17%的EDTA与2%的NaOCl一样有效地根除粪肠球菌生物膜。鼓励对多物种生物膜进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Repeated Firings on Color Stability of Zirconia- Reinforced Lithium Silicate and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics. Success and Survival of Composite Resin Restorations for the Management of Localized Anterior Tooth Wear: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Tensile Bond Strength, Fit Accuracy and Failure Types of Zirconia and Cast Gold Root Copings for Overdentures. Clinical Performance of 3D Printed Resin Composite Posterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Permanent Solution? Letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1