Neuromuscular Controller Models for Quantifying Standing Balance in Older People: A Systematic Review

IF 17.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2021-02-08 DOI:10.1109/RBME.2021.3057673
Fredrik Olsson;Kjartan Halvorsen;Anna Cristina Åberg
{"title":"Neuromuscular Controller Models for Quantifying Standing Balance in Older People: A Systematic Review","authors":"Fredrik Olsson;Kjartan Halvorsen;Anna Cristina Åberg","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2021.3057673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective quantification of the balancing mechanisms in humans is strongly needed in health care of older people, yet is largely missing among current clinical balance assessment methods. Hence, the main goal of this literature review is to identify methods that have the potential to meet that need. We searched in the PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases using predefined criteria, screened 1064 articles, and systematically reviewed and categorized methods from 73 studies that deal with identification of neuromuscular controller models of human upright standing from empirical data. These studies were then analyzed with the particular aim to understand to what degree such methods would be useful solutions for assessing the balance of older individuals aged above 60 years. The 16 studies that included an older subject population were especially examined with this in mind. The majority of the reviewed articles focused on research questions related to the general function of human balance control rather than clinical applicability. Further efforts need to be made to adapt these methods for more accessible and mobile technologies and to ensure that the outcomes are valid for balance assessment of a general older population.","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/RBME.2021.3057673","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9350163/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective quantification of the balancing mechanisms in humans is strongly needed in health care of older people, yet is largely missing among current clinical balance assessment methods. Hence, the main goal of this literature review is to identify methods that have the potential to meet that need. We searched in the PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases using predefined criteria, screened 1064 articles, and systematically reviewed and categorized methods from 73 studies that deal with identification of neuromuscular controller models of human upright standing from empirical data. These studies were then analyzed with the particular aim to understand to what degree such methods would be useful solutions for assessing the balance of older individuals aged above 60 years. The 16 studies that included an older subject population were especially examined with this in mind. The majority of the reviewed articles focused on research questions related to the general function of human balance control rather than clinical applicability. Further efforts need to be made to adapt these methods for more accessible and mobile technologies and to ensure that the outcomes are valid for balance assessment of a general older population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于量化老年人站立平衡的神经肌肉控制器模型:系统综述
在老年人的医疗保健中,迫切需要对人体平衡机制进行客观量化,但在目前的临床平衡评估方法中,这一点在很大程度上是缺失的。因此,本文献综述的主要目标是确定有可能满足这一需求的方法。我们使用预定义的标准在PubMed和IEEE Xplore数据库中进行了搜索,筛选了1064篇文章,并系统地回顾和分类了73项研究中的方法,这些研究涉及从经验数据中识别人类直立的神经肌肉控制器模型。然后对这些研究进行分析,特别是为了了解这些方法在多大程度上是评估60岁以上老年人平衡的有用解决方案。考虑到这一点,对包括老年受试者群体在内的16项研究进行了特别检查。大多数综述文章集中在与人类平衡控制的一般功能相关的研究问题上,而不是临床适用性。需要进一步努力,使这些方法适应更容易获得和移动的技术,并确保结果对一般老年人口的平衡评估有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
31.70
自引率
0.60%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (RBME) serves as a platform to review the state-of-the-art and trends in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, which encompasses engineering, life sciences, and medicine. The journal aims to consolidate research and reviews for members of all IEEE societies interested in biomedical engineering. Recognizing the demand for comprehensive reviews among authors of various IEEE journals, RBME addresses this need by receiving, reviewing, and publishing scholarly works under one umbrella. It covers a broad spectrum, from historical to modern developments in biomedical engineering and the integration of technologies from various IEEE societies into the life sciences and medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Few-Shot Learning for Biomedical Time Series. The Physiome Project and Digital Twins. Solving the Inverse Problem of Electrocardiography for Cardiac Digital Twins: A Survey. Data- and Physics-driven Deep Learning Based Reconstruction for Fast MRI: Fundamentals and Methodologies. Exhaled Breath Analysis: from Laboratory Test to Wearable Sensing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1