Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2025.3646327
Chentao Du, Ting Xiang, Guangyao Zhao, Mengkang Deng, Zijun Liu, Zexu Yang, Jiayuan Fang, Ningxu Yuan, Siyuan Zhou, Jian Li, Nan Ji, Jing-Song Ou, Alberto Avolio, Xinge Yu, Yuan-Ting Zhang, Tingrui Pan
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading global cause of death, highlights the critical need for effective blood pressure management. Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring, compared with invasive methods, enables home-based and long-term use, supporting early detection and continuous care. Despite significant progress, challenges remain, including accuracy issues, insufficient validation in real-world settings, limited application-specific sensor designs, and inadequate calibration standards and validation platforms. These gaps call for a systematic review to clarify the unmet needs and future research directions. This article reviews current advances in four key areas: (1) novel NIBP estimation principles designed to minimize user intervention; (2) flexible and wearable electronics that improve accuracy and comfort; (3) integration with theranostic applications and broader healthcare scenarios enabled by NIBP technologies; (4) calibration and validation strategies that enhance reliability and accuracy. With the rapid growth of home healthcare and AI-enabled wearable systems, addressing these challenges is essential to advance personalized, precise and stable cardiovascular medicine.
{"title":"A Perspective on Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring: Bridging Emerging Principles, Enabling Technologies and Extended Applications.","authors":"Chentao Du, Ting Xiang, Guangyao Zhao, Mengkang Deng, Zijun Liu, Zexu Yang, Jiayuan Fang, Ningxu Yuan, Siyuan Zhou, Jian Li, Nan Ji, Jing-Song Ou, Alberto Avolio, Xinge Yu, Yuan-Ting Zhang, Tingrui Pan","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3646327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2025.3646327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading global cause of death, highlights the critical need for effective blood pressure management. Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring, compared with invasive methods, enables home-based and long-term use, supporting early detection and continuous care. Despite significant progress, challenges remain, including accuracy issues, insufficient validation in real-world settings, limited application-specific sensor designs, and inadequate calibration standards and validation platforms. These gaps call for a systematic review to clarify the unmet needs and future research directions. This article reviews current advances in four key areas: (1) novel NIBP estimation principles designed to minimize user intervention; (2) flexible and wearable electronics that improve accuracy and comfort; (3) integration with theranostic applications and broader healthcare scenarios enabled by NIBP technologies; (4) calibration and validation strategies that enhance reliability and accuracy. With the rapid growth of home healthcare and AI-enabled wearable systems, addressing these challenges is essential to advance personalized, precise and stable cardiovascular medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2026.3652442
{"title":"IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","authors":"","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2026.3652442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2026.3652442","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"19 ","pages":"C2-C2"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11368668","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146071183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2025.3647848
Dario Farina;Tianyi Yu
Communication and control in biological systems is mediated by the timing of discharges –spikes– from excitable cells such as neurons and muscle fibers. Each spike is associated to a characteristic waveform that can be captured by sensors. The waveform's characteristics depend on the cell's biophysical properties and the recording modality. Depending on the technique, e.g., electrical recordings with electrodes, optical imaging, ultrasound, the observed signals are mixtures of waveforms emitted from active cells/sources (multiunit data/signals). Recovering the timing and identity of these sources (multiunit or spike decoding) is central to neuroscience, clinical diagnostics, and neural interfacing, yet it remains challenging due to waveform superposition, non-stationarity, limited training labels, and the computational demands of high-density recordings. This review provides a unified methodological perspective on spike decoding by formalizing the problem as a sparse source separation task under a convolutive mixing model. Rather than organizing the literature by application domain, we group and critically compare methods by their underlying principles: classical spike sorting, Bayesian and probabilistic inference, blind source separation, and data-driven approaches, including deep learning and hybrid schemes. For each class of methods, we present the core mathematical formulation and algorithmic strategies and discuss assumptions and limitations. Our synthesis highlights parallels in signal processing across physical recording modalities and clarifies when and why particular approaches succeed or fail. By bridging previously compartmentalized literature, this survey aims to accelerate crosspollination of ideas between application areas and to provide a roadmap for selecting, adapting, and advancing decoding methods across diverse multiunit recording modalities.
{"title":"Decoding Spikes From Multiunit Data","authors":"Dario Farina;Tianyi Yu","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3647848","DOIUrl":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3647848","url":null,"abstract":"Communication and control in biological systems is mediated by the timing of discharges –<italic>spikes</i>– from excitable cells such as neurons and muscle fibers. Each spike is associated to a characteristic waveform that can be captured by sensors. The waveform's characteristics depend on the cell's biophysical properties and the recording modality. Depending on the technique, e.g., electrical recordings with electrodes, optical imaging, ultrasound, the observed signals are mixtures of waveforms emitted from active cells/sources (<italic>multiunit</i> data/signals). Recovering the timing and identity of these sources (multiunit or spike decoding) is central to neuroscience, clinical diagnostics, and neural interfacing, yet it remains challenging due to waveform superposition, non-stationarity, limited training labels, and the computational demands of high-density recordings. This review provides a unified methodological perspective on spike decoding by formalizing the problem as a sparse source separation task under a convolutive mixing model. Rather than organizing the literature by application domain, we group and critically compare methods by their underlying principles: classical spike sorting, Bayesian and probabilistic inference, blind source separation, and data-driven approaches, including deep learning and hybrid schemes. For each class of methods, we present the core mathematical formulation and algorithmic strategies and discuss assumptions and limitations. Our synthesis highlights parallels in signal processing across physical recording modalities and clarifies when and why particular approaches succeed or fail. By bridging previously compartmentalized literature, this survey aims to accelerate crosspollination of ideas between application areas and to provide a roadmap for selecting, adapting, and advancing decoding methods across diverse multiunit recording modalities.","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"19 ","pages":"3-23"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11361153","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146031086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2025.3643310
Christoffer G. Alexandersen;Georgia S. Brennan;Julia K. Brynildsen;Michael X. Henderson;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Dani S. Bassett
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the accumulation of misfolded proteins and widespread disruptions in brain function. Computational modeling has advanced our understanding of these processes, but efforts have traditionally focused on either neuronal dynamics or the biological processes underlying disease. One class of models uses neural mass and whole-brain frameworks to simulate changes in oscillations, connectivity, and network stability. A second class focuses on biological processes underlying disease progression, particularly prion-like propagation through the connectome, glial responses and vascular mechanisms. Each modeling tradition has provided important insights, but experimental evidence shows these processes are interconnected: neuronal activity modulates protein release and clearance, while pathological burden disrupts neuronal function. Modeling these domains in isolation limits our understanding, although recent studies have begun to bridge the two by coupling neuronal and pathological processes. To determine where and why disease emerges, how it spreads, and how it might be altered, mathematical models that capture feedback between neuronal dynamics and disease biology are needed. This review surveys the two modeling approaches and highlights efforts to unify them, emphasizing that linking neuronal activity and disease progression is key to identifying strategies that slow, halt, or reverse degeneration and restore neural function.
{"title":"Network Models of Neurodegeneration: Bridging Neuronal Dynamics and Disease Progression","authors":"Christoffer G. Alexandersen;Georgia S. Brennan;Julia K. Brynildsen;Michael X. Henderson;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Dani S. Bassett","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3643310","DOIUrl":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3643310","url":null,"abstract":"Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the accumulation of misfolded proteins and widespread disruptions in brain function. Computational modeling has advanced our understanding of these processes, but efforts have traditionally focused on either neuronal dynamics or the biological processes underlying disease. One class of models uses neural mass and whole-brain frameworks to simulate changes in oscillations, connectivity, and network stability. A second class focuses on biological processes underlying disease progression, particularly prion-like propagation through the connectome, glial responses and vascular mechanisms. Each modeling tradition has provided important insights, but experimental evidence shows these processes are interconnected: neuronal activity modulates protein release and clearance, while pathological burden disrupts neuronal function. Modeling these domains in isolation limits our understanding, although recent studies have begun to bridge the two by coupling neuronal and pathological processes. To determine where and why disease emerges, how it spreads, and how it might be altered, mathematical models that capture feedback between neuronal dynamics and disease biology are needed. This review surveys the two modeling approaches and highlights efforts to unify them, emphasizing that linking neuronal activity and disease progression is key to identifying strategies that slow, halt, or reverse degeneration and restore neural function.","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"19 ","pages":"140-158"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11357276","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2025.3644411
Inka Mustajoki, Julien Riancho, Tuukka Panula, Jukka-Pekka Sirkia, Jorge Herranz Olazabal, Smriti Badhwar, Maria Kjellman, Katri Karhinoja, Maria Maia, Sam Riahi, Yannis Papadopoulos, Evelien Hermeling, Rosa-Maria Bruno, Matti Kaisti
Microcirculation is essential for maintaining tissue health and overall physiological function. Over the past few decades, various optical techniques have been developed to measure, visualize, and assess microvasculature. The skin has easily an accessible vascular bed allowing for noninvasive evaluation of microvascular function. Alterations in cutaneous microcirculation have been linked to dysfunctions in other target organs and vascular regions reinforcing the idea that cutaneous microcirculation can provide insights into systemic vascular conditions. Currently, there is no unified review focusing specifically on microcirculation-related optical techniques nor comprehensive analyses connecting these technological innovations to clinical evidence. This review aims to bridge that gap by systematically examining the wide spectrum of optical technologies used in assessing cutaneous microvascular function. We review techniques based on non-coherent light including oximetry, photoplethysmography, and microscopic methods and coherent light-based techniques, including speckle contrast imaging, diffuse correlation spectroscopy, photoacousting imaging, laser Doppler flowmetry and self-mixing interferometry. We emphasize cardiovascular research and evaluate the clinical relevance and technical maturity of the techniques. Additionally, brief explanation of skin structure and skin microvasculature while explaining light skin interaction is discussed. Lastly, we discuss these findings on wider context by including discussions and advancements in multimodal monitoring and machine learning.
{"title":"Optical Techniques to Assess Cutaneous Microvascular Function in Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Inka Mustajoki, Julien Riancho, Tuukka Panula, Jukka-Pekka Sirkia, Jorge Herranz Olazabal, Smriti Badhwar, Maria Kjellman, Katri Karhinoja, Maria Maia, Sam Riahi, Yannis Papadopoulos, Evelien Hermeling, Rosa-Maria Bruno, Matti Kaisti","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3644411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2025.3644411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microcirculation is essential for maintaining tissue health and overall physiological function. Over the past few decades, various optical techniques have been developed to measure, visualize, and assess microvasculature. The skin has easily an accessible vascular bed allowing for noninvasive evaluation of microvascular function. Alterations in cutaneous microcirculation have been linked to dysfunctions in other target organs and vascular regions reinforcing the idea that cutaneous microcirculation can provide insights into systemic vascular conditions. Currently, there is no unified review focusing specifically on microcirculation-related optical techniques nor comprehensive analyses connecting these technological innovations to clinical evidence. This review aims to bridge that gap by systematically examining the wide spectrum of optical technologies used in assessing cutaneous microvascular function. We review techniques based on non-coherent light including oximetry, photoplethysmography, and microscopic methods and coherent light-based techniques, including speckle contrast imaging, diffuse correlation spectroscopy, photoacousting imaging, laser Doppler flowmetry and self-mixing interferometry. We emphasize cardiovascular research and evaluate the clinical relevance and technical maturity of the techniques. Additionally, brief explanation of skin structure and skin microvasculature while explaining light skin interaction is discussed. Lastly, we discuss these findings on wider context by including discussions and advancements in multimodal monitoring and machine learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound imaging is widely used owing to its affordability, radiation-free, and non-invasive advantages. However, limitations stemming from operator dependence and artifacts have been noted. To address these issues, deep learning (DL) is increasingly being introduced. In oncology and cardiology, DL-equipped devices are transitioning to clinical use following approval. Nevertheless, DL faces challenges such as generalization, safety, and operational burden, making strategic implementation essential to maximize patient benefit. Existing reviews often list individual technologies but lack evaluation frameworks tailored to clinical implementation. Therefore, this review (i) organizes and formalizes limitations specific to ultrasound diagnosis, (ii) explains the latest DL methods addressing these limitations in terms of principles, implementation, and evaluation metrics, and (iii) examines recent clinical applications, including approved devices, supported by evidence, demonstrating that DL possesses substantial utility beyond the research stage for improving clinical workflows. It also critically evaluates remaining challenges, presents evaluation criteria to aid implementation, and identifies future research challenges.
{"title":"Establishment of High-Precision Ultrasound Diagnosis Methods Based on the Introduction of Deep Learning.","authors":"Masaaki Komatsu, Reina Komatsu, Akira Sakai, Suguru Yasutomi, Naoaki Harada, Rina Aoyama, Naoki Teraya, Katsuji Takeda, Takashi Natsume, Tomonori Taniguchi, Kazuki Iwamoto, Ryu Matsuoka, Akihiko Sekizawa, Ryuji Hamamoto","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3645229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2025.3645229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrasound imaging is widely used owing to its affordability, radiation-free, and non-invasive advantages. However, limitations stemming from operator dependence and artifacts have been noted. To address these issues, deep learning (DL) is increasingly being introduced. In oncology and cardiology, DL-equipped devices are transitioning to clinical use following approval. Nevertheless, DL faces challenges such as generalization, safety, and operational burden, making strategic implementation essential to maximize patient benefit. Existing reviews often list individual technologies but lack evaluation frameworks tailored to clinical implementation. Therefore, this review (i) organizes and formalizes limitations specific to ultrasound diagnosis, (ii) explains the latest DL methods addressing these limitations in terms of principles, implementation, and evaluation metrics, and (iii) examines recent clinical applications, including approved devices, supported by evidence, demonstrating that DL possesses substantial utility beyond the research stage for improving clinical workflows. It also critically evaluates remaining challenges, presents evaluation criteria to aid implementation, and identifies future research challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145879281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2025.3646165
Qihan Ye;Xingbang Yang;Ruoqi Zhao;Yuanlong Ji;Xinyuan Cai;Quan Zheng;Yubo Fan
Lower limb assistive exoskeletons (LLEs) show great potential to reduce metabolic cost, improve walking performance, and correct abnormal gait patterns. Among their core control architectures, assistive trajectory planning is key to determining system responsiveness and effectiveness under varying locomotion conditions. Many trajectory planning methods were proposed in either laboratory or unstructured real-world environments. To clarify the scope and challenges of existing research, this review categorizes trajectory planning strategies into two major types based on application scenarios: (1) strategies for laboratory settings with controllable disturbances, which usually involve optimal control for gait under stable or controllable conditions; and (2) strategies for real-world environments characterized by varying terrain, individual differences, and gait fluctuations, which usually involve adaptive control for gait under diverse or unstructured conditions. Given the foundational role of gait phase detection in trajectory planning, this review also systematically examines mainstream algorithms for gait phase recognition and estimation. Finally, the paper analyzes the limitations of existing methods and discusses the potential of advanced algorithms, intelligent multimodal sensing systems, novel sensing technologies, and embedded deployment to enhance the performance of exoskeleton assistive trajectory planning.
{"title":"Assistive Trajectory Planning for Lower Limb Exoskeletons: Strategies From Laboratory-Optimized Gait to Environmentally-Adaptive Locomotion Through Multimodal Parameter Awareness","authors":"Qihan Ye;Xingbang Yang;Ruoqi Zhao;Yuanlong Ji;Xinyuan Cai;Quan Zheng;Yubo Fan","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3646165","DOIUrl":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3646165","url":null,"abstract":"Lower limb assistive exoskeletons (LLEs) show great potential to reduce metabolic cost, improve walking performance, and correct abnormal gait patterns. Among their core control architectures, assistive trajectory planning is key to determining system responsiveness and effectiveness under varying locomotion conditions. Many trajectory planning methods were proposed in either laboratory or unstructured real-world environments. To clarify the scope and challenges of existing research, this review categorizes trajectory planning strategies into two major types based on application scenarios: (1) strategies for laboratory settings with controllable disturbances, which usually involve optimal control for gait under stable or controllable conditions; and (2) strategies for real-world environments characterized by varying terrain, individual differences, and gait fluctuations, which usually involve adaptive control for gait under diverse or unstructured conditions. Given the foundational role of gait phase detection in trajectory planning, this review also systematically examines mainstream algorithms for gait phase recognition and estimation. Finally, the paper analyzes the limitations of existing methods and discusses the potential of advanced algorithms, intelligent multimodal sensing systems, novel sensing technologies, and embedded deployment to enhance the performance of exoskeleton assistive trajectory planning.","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"19 ","pages":"41-64"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2025.3641959
Sara Nour Sadoun, Arnaud Boutin, Francois Cottin, Taous-Meriem Laleg-Kirati
Brain-heart interaction (BHI) is fundamental to autonomic regulation and also shapes perceptual salience, attentional control, decision-making under load, and affective reactivity. Beyond these functions, BHI has been consistently implicated in clinical studies in cardiovascular, neurological, and psychiatric conditions. This reality makes the investigation of bidirectional BHI mechanisms-and the derivation of interpretable biomarkers- - indispensable for cardiovascular, physiological, and neuroscientific research that treats the body as an interoceptive network of interacting organs rather than isolated systems. The growing interest in this perspective has generated a broad spectrum of frameworks, from signal-processing pipelines and computational models to dynamical systems. Building on previous surveys that have thoroughly mapped the field and deepened our understanding, this review offers a complementary perspective centered on mechanistic, physiology-inspired models of dynamical systems. For each model, we identify the physiological subsystem described, clarify core assumptions, and assess strengths and limitations. We then outline the technical perspectives necessary to realize the full potential of these approaches - especially for inferring latent interoceptive quantities that govern directional BHI but are not directly observable, and for integrating explicit brain modeling into these frameworks to better capture the neural mechanisms driving autonomic and cardiovascular dynamics. Mechanistic dynamical modeling has, over decades, deepened our understanding of physiology and pathology and informed the mapping and treatment of diverse conditions. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive account of state-of-the-art dynamical models, delineate methodological directions, and highlight application areas where such models can yield explanatory insight, reliable prediction, and actionable clinical targets.
{"title":"Modeling Brain-Heart Interaction: A Review of Mechanistic Dynamical Models.","authors":"Sara Nour Sadoun, Arnaud Boutin, Francois Cottin, Taous-Meriem Laleg-Kirati","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3641959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2025.3641959","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain-heart interaction (BHI) is fundamental to autonomic regulation and also shapes perceptual salience, attentional control, decision-making under load, and affective reactivity. Beyond these functions, BHI has been consistently implicated in clinical studies in cardiovascular, neurological, and psychiatric conditions. This reality makes the investigation of bidirectional BHI mechanisms-and the derivation of interpretable biomarkers- - indispensable for cardiovascular, physiological, and neuroscientific research that treats the body as an interoceptive network of interacting organs rather than isolated systems. The growing interest in this perspective has generated a broad spectrum of frameworks, from signal-processing pipelines and computational models to dynamical systems. Building on previous surveys that have thoroughly mapped the field and deepened our understanding, this review offers a complementary perspective centered on mechanistic, physiology-inspired models of dynamical systems. For each model, we identify the physiological subsystem described, clarify core assumptions, and assess strengths and limitations. We then outline the technical perspectives necessary to realize the full potential of these approaches - especially for inferring latent interoceptive quantities that govern directional BHI but are not directly observable, and for integrating explicit brain modeling into these frameworks to better capture the neural mechanisms driving autonomic and cardiovascular dynamics. Mechanistic dynamical modeling has, over decades, deepened our understanding of physiology and pathology and informed the mapping and treatment of diverse conditions. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive account of state-of-the-art dynamical models, delineate methodological directions, and highlight application areas where such models can yield explanatory insight, reliable prediction, and actionable clinical targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145821294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Resistive MEMS sensors have become increasingly significant in biomedical and bioenvironmental monitoring due to their compact dimensions, low energy demand, and high sensitivity. Despite structural simplicity and integration benefits, these sensors face performance constraints arising from intrinsic nonidealities such as nonlinearity, thermal drift, parasitic interactions, and process mismatches. These limitations intensify at micro and nanoscale dimensions and generate substantial DC offset in the output. This review presents a systematic analysis of resistive sensor architectures, including single resistor, half bridge, and full bridge configurations, and evaluates their susceptibility to distortion and noise through analytical modeling. Comparative assessment reveals tradeoffs in sensitivity, linearity, noise resilience, and thermal stability. The paper also examines advanced readout methodologies designed for precision measurement, low power operation, and compact integration, including voltage to voltage, voltage to frequency, resistance to digital, and RC delay based interfaces. Particular emphasis is placed on DC offset compensation strategies that address sensor nonidealities, such as resistive, current driven, and capacitive DAC techniques, implemented across different stages of the signal chain. These approaches are critically appraised for their effectiveness in extending dynamic range, reducing energy consumption, and preserving signal fidelity in implantable and wearable platforms. The survey synthesizes recent designs and proposes a classification framework to guide the selection of interface and compensation strategies designed to sensor topology and application constraints. By integrating theoretical insights with practical design considerations, this work provides a comprehensive reference for developing robust, precise, and energy efficient resistive sensor interfaces.
{"title":"Readout Techniques and Offset Compensation Strategies for Biomedical Resistive MEMS Sensors: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Reza Bostani, Esmaeil Ranjbar Koleibi, Gabriel Gagnon-Turcotte, Rejean Fontaine, Bhadra Sharmistha, Benoit Gosselin","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2025.3639404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2025.3639404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Resistive MEMS sensors have become increasingly significant in biomedical and bioenvironmental monitoring due to their compact dimensions, low energy demand, and high sensitivity. Despite structural simplicity and integration benefits, these sensors face performance constraints arising from intrinsic nonidealities such as nonlinearity, thermal drift, parasitic interactions, and process mismatches. These limitations intensify at micro and nanoscale dimensions and generate substantial DC offset in the output. This review presents a systematic analysis of resistive sensor architectures, including single resistor, half bridge, and full bridge configurations, and evaluates their susceptibility to distortion and noise through analytical modeling. Comparative assessment reveals tradeoffs in sensitivity, linearity, noise resilience, and thermal stability. The paper also examines advanced readout methodologies designed for precision measurement, low power operation, and compact integration, including voltage to voltage, voltage to frequency, resistance to digital, and RC delay based interfaces. Particular emphasis is placed on DC offset compensation strategies that address sensor nonidealities, such as resistive, current driven, and capacitive DAC techniques, implemented across different stages of the signal chain. These approaches are critically appraised for their effectiveness in extending dynamic range, reducing energy consumption, and preserving signal fidelity in implantable and wearable platforms. The survey synthesizes recent designs and proposes a classification framework to guide the selection of interface and compensation strategies designed to sensor topology and application constraints. By integrating theoretical insights with practical design considerations, this work provides a comprehensive reference for developing robust, precise, and energy efficient resistive sensor interfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}