NIPEC with Single-Dose Intraperitoneal Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1751098
Elroy Saldanha, Sanjay M Desai, Dhruv G Patel, Vinod Dhakad, Bonny Joseph, Sandeep Ghosh, Varun Prakash, Harsha Deepti, Ashma Monteiro
{"title":"NIPEC with Single-Dose Intraperitoneal Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Elroy Saldanha,&nbsp;Sanjay M Desai,&nbsp;Dhruv G Patel,&nbsp;Vinod Dhakad,&nbsp;Bonny Joseph,&nbsp;Sandeep Ghosh,&nbsp;Varun Prakash,&nbsp;Harsha Deepti,&nbsp;Ashma Monteiro","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1751098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sanjay M. Desai<b>Objectives</b>  Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a heterogeneous, essentially peritoneal disease. Standard treatment consists of staging, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and adjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, we intended to assess the effectiveness of single-dose intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in optimally debulked advanced EOC patients. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A prospective randomized study of 87 patients with advanced EOC was done from January 2017 to May 2021 in a tertiary care center. Patients who underwent primary and interval cytoreduction received a single dose of IP chemotherapy for 24 hours after being divided into four groups: group A, IP cisplatin; group B, IP paclitaxel; group C, IP paclitaxel and cisplatin; and group D, saline. Pre- and postperitoneal IP cytology was assessed along with possible complications. <b>Statistical Analysis</b>  Logistic regression analysis was used to assess for intergroup significance in cytology and complications. Kaplan-Meir analysis was done to assess disease-free survival (DFS). <b>Results</b>  Of 87 patients, 17.2% of patients had FIGO stage IIIA, 47.2% had IIIB, and 35.6% had IIIC. Also, 22 (25.3%) patients were in group A (cisplatin), 22 (25.3%) patients in group B (paclitaxel), 23 (26.4%) in group C (cisplatin and paclitaxel), and 20 (23%) in group D (saline). Cytology samples taken during staging laparotomy were positive, and 48 hours post-IP chemotherapy, 2 (9%) of 22 samples in cisplatin group and 14 (70%) of 20 samples in saline group were positive; all of the post-IP samples in groups B and C were negative. No major morbidity was noted. In our study, DFS in saline group was 15 months, while in IP chemotherapy group it was 28 months and was statistically significant based log-rank test. However, there was no significant difference in DFS between different IP chemotherapy groups. <b>Conclusion</b>  Complete or optimal CRS in advanced EOC does have a possibility of microscopic peritoneal residue. Adjuvant locoregional strategies should be considered to prolong DFS. Single-dose normothermic IP chemotherapy can be offered to the patients with minimal morbidity, and its prognostic benefits are comparable to hyperthermic IP chemotherapy. Future clinical trials are required to validate these protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"12 1","pages":"74-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/c9/10-1055-s-0042-1751098.PMC9970754.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1751098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sanjay M. DesaiObjectives  Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a heterogeneous, essentially peritoneal disease. Standard treatment consists of staging, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and adjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, we intended to assess the effectiveness of single-dose intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in optimally debulked advanced EOC patients. Materials and Methods  A prospective randomized study of 87 patients with advanced EOC was done from January 2017 to May 2021 in a tertiary care center. Patients who underwent primary and interval cytoreduction received a single dose of IP chemotherapy for 24 hours after being divided into four groups: group A, IP cisplatin; group B, IP paclitaxel; group C, IP paclitaxel and cisplatin; and group D, saline. Pre- and postperitoneal IP cytology was assessed along with possible complications. Statistical Analysis  Logistic regression analysis was used to assess for intergroup significance in cytology and complications. Kaplan-Meir analysis was done to assess disease-free survival (DFS). Results  Of 87 patients, 17.2% of patients had FIGO stage IIIA, 47.2% had IIIB, and 35.6% had IIIC. Also, 22 (25.3%) patients were in group A (cisplatin), 22 (25.3%) patients in group B (paclitaxel), 23 (26.4%) in group C (cisplatin and paclitaxel), and 20 (23%) in group D (saline). Cytology samples taken during staging laparotomy were positive, and 48 hours post-IP chemotherapy, 2 (9%) of 22 samples in cisplatin group and 14 (70%) of 20 samples in saline group were positive; all of the post-IP samples in groups B and C were negative. No major morbidity was noted. In our study, DFS in saline group was 15 months, while in IP chemotherapy group it was 28 months and was statistically significant based log-rank test. However, there was no significant difference in DFS between different IP chemotherapy groups. Conclusion  Complete or optimal CRS in advanced EOC does have a possibility of microscopic peritoneal residue. Adjuvant locoregional strategies should be considered to prolong DFS. Single-dose normothermic IP chemotherapy can be offered to the patients with minimal morbidity, and its prognostic benefits are comparable to hyperthermic IP chemotherapy. Future clinical trials are required to validate these protocols.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NIPEC联合单剂量顺铂和紫杉醇治疗III期上皮性卵巢癌。
上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)是一种异质性的腹膜性疾病。标准治疗包括分期、细胞减少手术(CRS)和辅助化疗。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估单剂量腹腔内化疗(IP)在最佳减积晚期EOC患者中的有效性。材料与方法2017年1月至2021年5月在某三级医疗中心对87例晚期EOC患者进行前瞻性随机研究。接受原发性和间期细胞减少的患者,在分为4组后,接受单剂量IP化疗,持续24小时:a组,IP顺铂;B组为IP紫杉醇;C组:紫杉醇+顺铂;D组生理盐水。评估腹膜前和腹膜后的IP细胞学以及可能的并发症。统计学分析采用Logistic回归分析评估各组间细胞学及并发症的差异。Kaplan-Meir分析评估无病生存期(DFS)。结果87例患者中,FIGO IIIA期患者占17.2%,IIIB期患者占47.2%,IIIC期患者占35.6%。A组(顺铂)22例(25.3%),B组(紫杉醇)22例(25.3%),C组(顺铂+紫杉醇)23例(26.4%),D组(生理盐水)20例(23%)。剖腹分期取细胞学标本阳性,化疗后48小时,顺铂组22例标本中2例(9%)阳性,生理盐水组20例标本中14例(70%)阳性;B、C组ip后标本均为阴性。未见重大发病。在我们的研究中,生理盐水组的DFS为15个月,而IP化疗组的DFS为28个月,经log-rank检验有统计学意义。然而,不同IP化疗组之间的DFS无显著差异。结论晚期EOC的完全或最佳CRS确实存在显微镜下腹膜残留的可能性。应考虑局部辅助策略以延长DFS。单剂量常温IP化疗可为患者提供最低的发病率,其预后益处与高温IP化疗相当。需要未来的临床试验来验证这些方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Staging and Management of Cervical Cancer at the Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh. COVID-19 Impact on Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancers at Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram-An Audit. Do Uro-Oncology Day Care Procedures Need to Be Differed during COVID-19 Pandemic?-An Experience from Tertiary Cancer Care Center. Colorectal Origin: A Marker of Favorable Outcome in Krukenberg Tumor? Results from Clinical and Prognostic Analysis. Cytogenetic Alterations and Correlation with Age and Gender in Patients of Multiple Myeloma: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1