South Asian Journal of Cancer最新文献

Anjuman SultanaCervical cancer (CC) ranks as the second most common cancer among women in Bangladesh. Unfortunately, due to late-stage diagnosis and inadequate treatment facilities, the mortality rate remains high. The stage at which CC is diagnosed plays a crucial role in predicting a woman's survival. This study aimed to determine the staging patterns of CC at presentation in the colposcopy clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) and the subsequent management provided to these women. This retrospective study was conducted at the BSMMU colposcopy clinic from January 2019 to June 2020. It included CC cases with known staging, spanning from January 2016 to June 2019. Data were collected from the colposcopy registry book, telephone interviews, and face-to-face discussions during follow-up appointments. The mean age of women diagnosed with CC was 48.59 years (±2 standard deviations). Among the 523 women studied, 107 (20.5%) were diagnosed at stage I, 124 (23.7%) at stage IIA, 240 (45.9%) at stage IIB, while the remaining 52 (9.90%) were diagnosed with Stage III and IV disease. Within the study population, 39 (7.5%) women underwent radical hysterectomy alone, 110 (21.00%) underwent radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant therapy, and 184 (35.14%) received primary radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation. A significant portion of CC cases presented at an early stage, underscoring the importance of an effective screening program to prevent advanced-stage disease and enhance early detection rates. Establishing a patient navigation system immediately after diagnosis is crucial to prevent the loss of follow-up and ensure timely treatment. It is imperative to enhance the healthcare system's capacity to ensure timely treatment for cancer patients.

Purnima Thakur This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors affecting the survival of patients suffering from Krukenberg tumor (KT) and also to determine the survival in these patients. A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with KT between January 2015 and December 2021 was conducted at a tertiary cancer center. Clinicopathological variables were scrutinized, and survival analysis was performed. Thirty-six patients were enrolled in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 48 years (ranging from 22 to 71 years). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.6 to 13 months). The mean OS for tumors originating in the colorectal region was longer compared to that for tumors of other sites (15.4 vs. 9 months, respectively; p  = 0.048). In univariate analysis, patients who received chemotherapy had better survival, while those presenting with ascites had a poor prognosis. No correlation was observed between age, menstrual status, bilaterality, size of ovarian metastases, extent of metastatic disease, metastasectomy, and survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that chemotherapy predicted a favorable survival outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.200, 95% CI: 0.046-0.877, p -value = 0.033). KT is an aggressive tumor with a median OS of less than a year. Chemotherapy may improve survival. Patients with a primary tumor in the colorectal region have a better outcome, while those presenting with ascites indicate a poor prognosis.

Nisha Prasannan Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in India, with a significant number presenting as locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Level III clearance is routinely performed in our institute in LABC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). In our previous retrospective study, level III positivity rate was 15.5%. We aim to prospectively assess level III positivity rate in LABC patients post-NACT. This is a prospective study of female patients with LABC (defined as cT3N1-3M0 or cT4N0-3M0 or cT _any N2,3M0) who received NACT and underwent surgery including level III dissection from November 2019 to October 2021. Data collected included age, menopausal status, TNM stage at presentation, grade, hormone receptor and HER2 status, treatment response, ycT and ycN stage, and final histopathology. Univariate and multivariate analysis was undertaken. p -Value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered significant. Study recruited 598 patients. Level III node positivity rate was 8.4%. The clinical complete response rate (cCR) was 36% (215/598). On univariate analysis, significant association was present between level III node and cCR ( p  < 0.01), ycT0 stage ( p  = 0.001), ycN0 stage ( p  = 0.028), level II node positivity ( p  = 0.001), ypT stage ( p  = 0.001), and ypN stage ( p  = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, significant association was present between level III node and ycT stage ( p  < 0.001), ypT stage ( p  = 0.001), and ypN stage ( p  = 0.001). Level III positivity rate in LABC post-NACT is high. In patients with advanced ycT stage, it would be advisable to offer complete axillary dissection including level III. Level III dissection may be avoided in patients with ycT0 or ycN0 or with cCR.

Karuna JhaBackground  Multiple myeloma is a cytogenetically heterogeneous, evolving, and incurable disease. Differences in prevalence of myeloma already exist in Indian subcontinent as compared with Western world countries. This study attempts to investigate differences in incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) in Eastern Indian patients and study differences in incidence with respect to age and gender. Materials and Methods  Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was applied on purified plasma cells of 280 newly diagnosed myeloma cases using specific probes. Statistical Analysis  Data was analyzed using SPSS software version 25. Results  Note that 51.07% patients were FISH positive. Del13q was the most common CA. Significant association of del 13q with t(4;14), del 17p, and gain of 1q was seen. The frequencies of FISH positive and negative groups differed in the different age groups; higher number of cases in 41 to 50 years group in FISH positive group ( p  < 0.05) and lower number of cases in FISH positive group in 61 to 70 years ( p  < 0.05) as compared with FISH negative group. Del 17p had higher number of cases in age group 41 to 50 years and 51 to 60 years as compared with other age groups. Incidence of t(11;14) was in 5th to 7th decade while del 13q and t(4;14) had the widest range of age at presentation. Gender disparities were seen in high-risk cytogenetics like del 17p and 1q gain. Conclusion  The differences in incidence rate of CAs per se in myeloma cases diagnosed in Indian subcontinent and the differences in incidence with respect to age and gender warrant further multicentric studies.

Geethu Babu The coronavirus pandemic has created havoc in every aspect of life including cancer care and was declared a pandemic. This audit was conducted to study the impact of the pandemic on diagnosis and treatment of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at a tertiary cancer center in South India. A total of 1,647 patients who registered at Regional Cancer Centre (RCC), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India for breast cancer during the period April 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020 (COVID-19 period) as well as April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period) were included in the study. Data regarding the geographic distribution, stage at presentation, time factors for reporting for care, diagnosis, and treatment, referral for care elsewhere were collected and analyzed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Means and ranges were calculated for continuous type variables, and numbers and percentages for categorical variables. To determine whether there were significant differences between the two groups, independent t -test was used for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical type of variables. A notable reduction (36%) in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients was seen in 2020 when compared with 2019. There was a significant difference in the geographic distribution of patients in both cohorts ( p  = 0.001) and a notable reduction in the number of patients reporting to RCC for treatment from the northern districts of Kerala (81%) and outside Kerala (89.5%). There was no significant difference in the time (in weeks) since symptom onset and reporting to hospital or the clinical stage at diagnosis between the groups. Also, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) did not seem to negatively impact time intervals between date of registration and pathological diagnosis or start of primary treatment. More patients received neoadjuvant systemic therapy during 2020 compared with 2019, and this difference was statistically significant ( p  = 0.004). There was no difference in the type of surgery (breast-conserving surgery vs. modified radical mastectomy). The results demonstrate that COVID-19 did not appear to negatively impact the diagnosis and treatment of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. However, this is largely attributable to the significantly less number of patients who registered, for whom the departments were able to maintain timely cancer care despite the difficult pandemic times. Significantly more patients received neoadjuvant systemic therapy in 2020.

Mahendra PalBackground  The SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic has affected millions all over the world in very short span and changed the way how health care system work across the globe. It is essential to continue cancer treatment in spite of such pandemics. Various recommendations were proposed for cancer management based on risk stratification, however, in urological malignancies, day care procedures (DCPs) are a part of complete spectrum of cancer care and standard operating procedures (SOPs) for day care procedures (DCPs)in oncology is lacking at present. Materials and Methods  This is an institutional review board approved retrospective observational analytical study performed in tertiary cancer care center, with aim to assess the impact of COVID-19 on Uro-oncology day care procedures (U-DCPs)in terms of changes in appointments and actual U-DCPs performed, demographic changes such as sex ratio and age wise attendance in pre and post lockdown period and to provide a SOPs to accomplishU-DCPsefficiently in pandemics. Results  There was 67.89% and 68.16% reduction in total numbers of appointment and performed U-DCPs. A statistically significant difference was found in cystoscopy, intravesicalinstallation and miscellaneous UDCPs. Overall, 4.45% reduction and 4.52% increase in male and female patients underwent UDCPs respectively, M:F ratio reduced from 3.58:1 to 2.79:1 and 30% to 50% reduction in overall patient statistics in post lockdown compare to pre lockdown procedures. For various age groups there was a statistically significant change in the number for males underwent cystoscopy in (p<0.001), Intravesical therapies (p<0.001) and miscellaneous procedures(p< 0.004). Conclusion  We are now coming up to the fact that effective management of healthcare system during pandemics require establishment and effective implementation of standard protocols. Routine major urological surgical care is continued using a tiered standard of protocols (SOPs) and adequate precautions. This study may provide an insight into impact of COVID-19 on UDCPs and what precautions and strategies can be institutionalized so that the patients and the health care workers remain protected from contracting infection while in performing DCPs during pandemic or similar circumstances.

Purvish M ParikhS-1 (5-fluorouracil prodrug [tegafur] in combination with 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine [CDHP] and potassium oxonate [OXO]) was first approved in 1999. In order to make it easy for community oncologists, we decided to put together this expert consensus guideline for its use in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. A total of 15 subject matter experts used modified Delphi method to discuss, analyze, and vote on key aspects regarding practical approach to use of S-1 in GI cancers, a process involving 6 months of work. The consensus guidelines specify how S-1 use can be optimized in patients with colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic tumors. The voting for the 17 key points resulted in a majority consensus for all the statements (approval ranging from 13/15 [87%] to 15/15 [100%]). S-1 is a combination of three drugs (tegafur, CDHP, and OXO) specifically designed to reduce toxicity and enhance efficacy; clinical data and meta-analysis confirm both factors; and it is recommended as standard of care for GI cancers. S-1 is approved and one of the standards of care for all lines of therapy in colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancers. S-1 with oxaliplatin is the standard of care for gastric cancers.