A critical realist exploration of factors influencing engagement in diabetes prevention programs in rural settings.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian journal of primary health Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1071/PY22256
Britney McMullen, Kerith Duncanson, David Schmidt, Clare Collins, Lesley MacDonald-Wicks
{"title":"A critical realist exploration of factors influencing engagement in diabetes prevention programs in rural settings.","authors":"Britney McMullen,&nbsp;Kerith Duncanson,&nbsp;David Schmidt,&nbsp;Clare Collins,&nbsp;Lesley MacDonald-Wicks","doi":"10.1071/PY22256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes prevention programs are intended to reduce progression to type 2 diabetes, but are underutilised. This study aimed to explore people with prediabetes' knowledge and attitudes about prediabetes, and their perceptions about engagement in preventive programs in a rural setting. The findings will inform strategies and recommendations to increase preventive health program engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a qualitative approach with a critical realist methodology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 rural participants with prediabetes from the Northern New South Wales Local Health District in 2021. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. The social-ecological model was used as a framework to interpret and action the study findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors that empowered participants and facilitated a desire to engage in preventive programs included knowledge about prediabetes, a high level of social support, trusting and supportive relationships with health professionals, and a strong desire not to progress to diabetes. Barriers to program engagement included low health literacy levels, limited support, negative experiences with health services, and social and physical constraints. The factors that influenced engagement with preventive health programs were mapped to an individual, interpersonal, organisational, community and policy level, which highlighted the complex nature of behaviour change and the influence of underlying mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engagement in diabetes prevention programs was dependent on individual agency factors and structural barriers, each of which related to a level of the social-ecological model. Understanding the perceptions of people with prediabetes will inform strategies to overcome multi-level barriers to preventive health program engagement in rural settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":"510-519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes prevention programs are intended to reduce progression to type 2 diabetes, but are underutilised. This study aimed to explore people with prediabetes' knowledge and attitudes about prediabetes, and their perceptions about engagement in preventive programs in a rural setting. The findings will inform strategies and recommendations to increase preventive health program engagement.

Methods: Using a qualitative approach with a critical realist methodology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 rural participants with prediabetes from the Northern New South Wales Local Health District in 2021. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. The social-ecological model was used as a framework to interpret and action the study findings.

Results: Factors that empowered participants and facilitated a desire to engage in preventive programs included knowledge about prediabetes, a high level of social support, trusting and supportive relationships with health professionals, and a strong desire not to progress to diabetes. Barriers to program engagement included low health literacy levels, limited support, negative experiences with health services, and social and physical constraints. The factors that influenced engagement with preventive health programs were mapped to an individual, interpersonal, organisational, community and policy level, which highlighted the complex nature of behaviour change and the influence of underlying mechanisms.

Conclusions: Engagement in diabetes prevention programs was dependent on individual agency factors and structural barriers, each of which related to a level of the social-ecological model. Understanding the perceptions of people with prediabetes will inform strategies to overcome multi-level barriers to preventive health program engagement in rural settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对影响农村地区糖尿病预防项目参与因素的批判性现实主义探索。
背景:糖尿病预防计划旨在减少2型糖尿病的进展,但没有得到充分利用。本研究旨在探讨糖尿病前期患者对糖尿病前期的知识和态度,以及他们对在农村环境中参与预防计划的看法。研究结果将为提高预防性健康项目参与度的策略和建议提供信息。方法:采用定性方法和批判性现实主义方法,于2021年对新南威尔士州北部地方卫生区的20名糖尿病前期农村参与者进行了半结构化访谈。访谈是录音的,逐字逐句转录,并按主题进行分析。社会生态学模型被用作解释和行动研究结果的框架。结果:增强参与者能力并促进他们参与预防计划的因素包括糖尿病前期的知识、高水平的社会支持、与卫生专业人员的信任和支持关系,以及不发展为糖尿病的强烈愿望。参与计划的障碍包括健康知识水平低、支持有限、在卫生服务方面的负面经历以及社会和身体限制。影响参与预防性健康计划的因素被映射到个人、人际、组织、社区和政策层面,这突出了行为变化的复杂性和潜在机制的影响。结论:参与糖尿病预防计划取决于个体机构因素和结构障碍,每一个因素都与社会生态模式的水平有关。了解糖尿病前期患者的认知将有助于制定战略,克服农村地区参与预防性健康计划的多层次障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
期刊最新文献
Australian healthcare professionals’ beliefs and practice behaviours in management of chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional survey General practice registrars’ practice in outer metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional comparison with rural and inner metropolitan areas Hepatitis C elimination: amplifying the role of primary care nurses in Australia Abstracts of the Australasian Association for Academic Primary Care (AAAPC) Annual Research Conference Older patients want to talk about sexual health in Australian primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1