Conversion of osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture severity score to osteoporosis T-score equivalent status: A framework study for older Chinese men

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.004
Yì Xiáng J. Wáng , Jason C.S. Leung , Patti M.S. Lam , Timothy C.Y. Kwok
{"title":"Conversion of osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture severity score to osteoporosis T-score equivalent status: A framework study for older Chinese men","authors":"Yì Xiáng J. Wáng ,&nbsp;Jason C.S. Leung ,&nbsp;Patti M.S. Lam ,&nbsp;Timothy C.Y. Kwok","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To define what portion of older community men with what severity of radiographic osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture (OLVF) correspond to what low T-score status.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>There were 755 community Chinese men (age: 76.4 ± 6.7 years) with thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs, and hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density measures. For each vertebra in a subject, a score of 0, -0.5, −1, −1.5, −2, −2.5, and −3 was assigned for no OLVF or OLVF of &lt;20%, ≥ 20–25%, ≥ 2 5%–1/3, ≥ 1/3–40%, ≥ 40%–2/3, and ≥ 2/3 vertebral height loss, respectively. OLVFss was defined as the summed score of vertebrae T4 to L5. OLVFss and T-scores were ranked from the smallest to the largest values.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>OLVFss of −2, −2.5, −3, corresponded to a mean femoral neck T-score of −2.297 (range: -2.355∼-2.247), −2.494 (range: -2.637∼ −2.363), and −2.773 (range: -2.898∼-2.643), a mean hip T-score of-2.311 (range: -2.420∼-2.234), −2.572 (range: -2.708∼-2.432), −2.911 (range: -3.134∼-2.708), a mean lumbar spine T-score of −2.495 (range: -2.656∼-2.403), −2.931 (range: -3.255∼-2.664), and −3.369 (range: -3.525∼-3.258). The Pearson correlation value of OLVFss and T-score of femoral neck, hip and lumbar spine was <em>r</em> = 0.21, 0.26, and 0.22 (all P &lt; 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A single severe grade radiological OLVF (≥ 40% height loss) or OLVFss ≤ −2.5 suggest the subject is osteoporotic, and a single collapse grade (≥ 2/3 height loss) OLVF or OLVFss ≤ −3 meets osteoporosis diagnosis criterion. The results highlight the difficulty of diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral fractures among Chinese older men.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 14-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111950/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525523000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives

To define what portion of older community men with what severity of radiographic osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture (OLVF) correspond to what low T-score status.

Methods

There were 755 community Chinese men (age: 76.4 ± 6.7 years) with thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs, and hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density measures. For each vertebra in a subject, a score of 0, -0.5, −1, −1.5, −2, −2.5, and −3 was assigned for no OLVF or OLVF of <20%, ≥ 20–25%, ≥ 2 5%–1/3, ≥ 1/3–40%, ≥ 40%–2/3, and ≥ 2/3 vertebral height loss, respectively. OLVFss was defined as the summed score of vertebrae T4 to L5. OLVFss and T-scores were ranked from the smallest to the largest values.

Results

OLVFss of −2, −2.5, −3, corresponded to a mean femoral neck T-score of −2.297 (range: -2.355∼-2.247), −2.494 (range: -2.637∼ −2.363), and −2.773 (range: -2.898∼-2.643), a mean hip T-score of-2.311 (range: -2.420∼-2.234), −2.572 (range: -2.708∼-2.432), −2.911 (range: -3.134∼-2.708), a mean lumbar spine T-score of −2.495 (range: -2.656∼-2.403), −2.931 (range: -3.255∼-2.664), and −3.369 (range: -3.525∼-3.258). The Pearson correlation value of OLVFss and T-score of femoral neck, hip and lumbar spine was r = 0.21, 0.26, and 0.22 (all P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

A single severe grade radiological OLVF (≥ 40% height loss) or OLVFss ≤ −2.5 suggest the subject is osteoporotic, and a single collapse grade (≥ 2/3 height loss) OLVF or OLVFss ≤ −3 meets osteoporosis diagnosis criterion. The results highlight the difficulty of diagnosing osteoporotic vertebral fractures among Chinese older men.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨质疏松样椎体骨折严重程度评分转换为骨质疏松t评分等效状态:一项针对中国老年男性的框架研究
目的确定哪些老年社区男性的放射学骨质疏松样脊椎骨折(OLVF)严重程度对应于什么样的低T评分状态。方法对755名中国社区男性(年龄:76.4±6.7岁)进行胸腰椎x线片和髋腰椎骨密度测量。对于受试者的每个椎骨,对于没有OLVF或OLVF<;椎体高度损失分别为20%、≥20-25%、≥2.5%–1/3、≥1/3–40%、≥40%–2/3和≥2/3。OLVFss被定义为脊椎T4至L5的总分。OLVFss和T评分从最小值到最大值进行排序。结果OLVFss为−2、−2.5、−3,对应的平均股骨颈T型芯为−2.297(范围:-2.355~-2.247)、−2.494(范围:-26.37~-2.363)和−2.773(范围:-28.98~-2.643,−2.931(范围:-3.255~-2..664)和−3.369(范围:-35.25~-3.258)。OLVFss与股骨颈、髋关节和腰椎T型评分的Pearson相关值分别为r=0.21、0.26和0.22(均P<0.0001),单一塌陷分级(≥2/3身高损失)OLVF或OLVFss≤−3符合骨质疏松症诊断标准。研究结果突出了中国老年男性骨质疏松性脊椎骨折的诊断难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Does intradiscal steroid injection accelerate the histological degeneration of the human disc? Surgery for spinal deformity with osteoporosis: Achieving successful fusion Verification of grip strength as an evaluation tool for locomotive syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis Effects of whole-body vibration on bone properties in type 2 diabetes model rats Choice of cemented or uncemented stems for displaced femoral neck fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1