Development and validation of the Chinese osteoporosis screening algorithm (COSA) in identification of people with high risk of osteoporosis

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.009
Ching-Lung Cheung , Gloria HY. Li , Hang-Long Li , Constance Mak , Kathryn CB. Tan , Annie WC. Kung
{"title":"Development and validation of the Chinese osteoporosis screening algorithm (COSA) in identification of people with high risk of osteoporosis","authors":"Ching-Lung Cheung ,&nbsp;Gloria HY. Li ,&nbsp;Hang-Long Li ,&nbsp;Constance Mak ,&nbsp;Kathryn CB. Tan ,&nbsp;Annie WC. Kung","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2023.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To enhance the public awareness and facilitate diagnosis of osteoporosis, we aim to develop a new Chinese Osteoporosis Screening Algorithm (COSA) to identify people at high risk of osteoporosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 4747 postmenopausal women and men aged ≥ 50 from the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study were randomly split into a development (N = 2373) and an internal validation cohort (N = 2374). An external validation cohort comprising 1876 community-dwelling subjects was used to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 11 predictors included, age, sex, weight, and history of fracture were significantly associated with osteoporosis after correction for multiple testing. Age- and sex-stratified models were developed due to the presence of significant sex and age interactions. The area under the curve of the COSA in the internal validation cohort was 0.761 (95% CI, 0.711–0.811), 0.822 (95% CI, 0.792–0.851), and 0.946 (95% CI, 0.908–0.984) for women aged &lt; 65, women aged ≥ 65, and men, respectively. The COSA demonstrated improved reclassification performance when compared to Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians. In the external validation cohort, the PPV of COSA was 40.6%, 59.4%, and 19.4% for women aged &lt; 65, women aged ≥ 65, and men, respectively. In addition, COSA &gt; 0 was associated with an increased 10-year risk of hip fracture in women ≥ 65 (OR, 4.65; 95% CI, 2.24–9.65) and men (OR, 11.51; 95% CI, 4.16–31.81).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We have developed and validated a new osteoporosis screening algorithm, COSA, specific for Hong Kong Chinese.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10111958/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525523000109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives

To enhance the public awareness and facilitate diagnosis of osteoporosis, we aim to develop a new Chinese Osteoporosis Screening Algorithm (COSA) to identify people at high risk of osteoporosis.

Methods

A total of 4747 postmenopausal women and men aged ≥ 50 from the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study were randomly split into a development (N = 2373) and an internal validation cohort (N = 2374). An external validation cohort comprising 1876 community-dwelling subjects was used to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV).

Results

Among 11 predictors included, age, sex, weight, and history of fracture were significantly associated with osteoporosis after correction for multiple testing. Age- and sex-stratified models were developed due to the presence of significant sex and age interactions. The area under the curve of the COSA in the internal validation cohort was 0.761 (95% CI, 0.711–0.811), 0.822 (95% CI, 0.792–0.851), and 0.946 (95% CI, 0.908–0.984) for women aged < 65, women aged ≥ 65, and men, respectively. The COSA demonstrated improved reclassification performance when compared to Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians. In the external validation cohort, the PPV of COSA was 40.6%, 59.4%, and 19.4% for women aged < 65, women aged ≥ 65, and men, respectively. In addition, COSA > 0 was associated with an increased 10-year risk of hip fracture in women ≥ 65 (OR, 4.65; 95% CI, 2.24–9.65) and men (OR, 11.51; 95% CI, 4.16–31.81).

Conclusions

We have developed and validated a new osteoporosis screening algorithm, COSA, specific for Hong Kong Chinese.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国骨质疏松筛查算法(COSA)在骨质疏松高危人群识别中的开发与验证
目的为了提高公众对骨质疏松症的认识和便于诊断,我们旨在开发一种新的中国骨质疏松症筛查算法(COSA)来识别骨质疏松症高危人群。方法将来自香港骨质疏松症研究的4747名绝经后妇女和年龄≥50岁的男性随机分为发展组(N=2373)和内部验证组(N=237 4)。一个由1876名居住在社区的受试者组成的外部验证队列用于评估阳性预测值(PPV)。结果在包括在内的11个预测因素中,年龄、性别、体重和骨折史在多重测试校正后与骨质疏松症显著相关。由于存在显著的性别和年龄相互作用,因此开发了年龄和性别分层模型。对于<;分别为65岁、≥65岁的女性和男性。与针对亚洲人的骨质疏松症自我评估工具相比,COSA的重新分类表现有所改善。在外部验证队列中,年龄<;分别为65岁、≥65岁的女性和男性。此外,COSA>;0与≥65岁的女性(OR,4.65;95%CI,2.24–9.65)和男性(OR,11.51;95%CI,4.16–31.81)髋关节骨折的10年风险增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Does intradiscal steroid injection accelerate the histological degeneration of the human disc? Surgery for spinal deformity with osteoporosis: Achieving successful fusion Verification of grip strength as an evaluation tool for locomotive syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis Effects of whole-body vibration on bone properties in type 2 diabetes model rats Choice of cemented or uncemented stems for displaced femoral neck fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1