qSOFA as a predictor of ICU outcomes in a resource-limited setting in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.

S M Savarimuthu, C Cairns, N L Allorto, G E Weissman, R Kohn, R D Wise, G L Anesi
{"title":"qSOFA as a predictor of ICU outcomes in a resource-limited setting in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.","authors":"S M Savarimuthu,&nbsp;C Cairns,&nbsp;N L Allorto,&nbsp;G E Weissman,&nbsp;R Kohn,&nbsp;R D Wise,&nbsp;G L Anesi","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in critical care patients. Developing tools to identify patients who are at risk of poor outcomes and prolonged length of stay in intensive care units (ICUs) is critical, particularly in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score based on bedside assessment alone was a promising tool for risk prediction in low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Edendale Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (SA), was recruited into the study between 2014 and 2018. The association of qSOFA with in-ICU mortality was measured using multivariable logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the additive contribution to a baseline model using likelihood ratio testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qSOFA scores of 0, 1 and 2 were not associated with increased odds of in-ICU mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 - 1.79; <i>p</i>=0.26) in patients with infection, while the qSOFA of 3 was associated with in-ICU mortality in infected patients (aOR 2.82; 95% CI 1.91 - 4.16; <i>p</i><0.001). On the other hand, the qSOFA scores of 2 (aOR 3.25; 95% CI 1.91 - 5.53; <i>p</i><0.001) and 3 (aOR 6.26, 95% CI 0.38 - 11.62, <i>p</i><0.001) were associated with increased odds of in-ICU mortality in patients without infection. Discrimination for mortality was fair to poor and adding qSOFA to a baseline model yielded a statistical improvement in both cases (<i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>qSOFA was associated with, but weakly discriminant, for in-ICU mortality for patients with and without infection in a resource-limited, public hospital in SA. These findings add to the growing body of evidence that support the use of qSOFA to deliver low-cost, high-value critical care in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>This study expanded the data supporting the use of qSOFA in resource-limited settings beyond the emergency department or ward to include patients admitted to the ICU. Additionally, this study demonstrated stronger predictive abilities in a population of patients admitted with trauma without suspected or confirmed infection, thus providing an additional use of qSOFA as a risk-prediction tool for a broader population.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/9f/SAJCC-36-2-433.PMC9045512.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in critical care patients. Developing tools to identify patients who are at risk of poor outcomes and prolonged length of stay in intensive care units (ICUs) is critical, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Objectives: To determine whether the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score based on bedside assessment alone was a promising tool for risk prediction in low-resource settings.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at Edendale Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (SA), was recruited into the study between 2014 and 2018. The association of qSOFA with in-ICU mortality was measured using multivariable logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the additive contribution to a baseline model using likelihood ratio testing.

Results: The qSOFA scores of 0, 1 and 2 were not associated with increased odds of in-ICU mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 - 1.79; p=0.26) in patients with infection, while the qSOFA of 3 was associated with in-ICU mortality in infected patients (aOR 2.82; 95% CI 1.91 - 4.16; p<0.001). On the other hand, the qSOFA scores of 2 (aOR 3.25; 95% CI 1.91 - 5.53; p<0.001) and 3 (aOR 6.26, 95% CI 0.38 - 11.62, p<0.001) were associated with increased odds of in-ICU mortality in patients without infection. Discrimination for mortality was fair to poor and adding qSOFA to a baseline model yielded a statistical improvement in both cases (p<0.001).

Conclusion: qSOFA was associated with, but weakly discriminant, for in-ICU mortality for patients with and without infection in a resource-limited, public hospital in SA. These findings add to the growing body of evidence that support the use of qSOFA to deliver low-cost, high-value critical care in resource-limited settings.

Contributions of the study: This study expanded the data supporting the use of qSOFA in resource-limited settings beyond the emergency department or ward to include patients admitted to the ICU. Additionally, this study demonstrated stronger predictive abilities in a population of patients admitted with trauma without suspected or confirmed infection, thus providing an additional use of qSOFA as a risk-prediction tool for a broader population.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
qSOFA作为南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省资源有限环境下ICU预后的预测因子
背景:脓毒症是发病率和死亡率的主要原因,特别是在重症监护患者中。开发工具来识别有预后不良风险和重症监护病房(icu)住院时间延长的患者至关重要,特别是在资源有限的环境中。目的:确定仅基于床边评估的快速顺序器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分是否为低资源环境下风险预测的一种有前景的工具。方法:回顾性研究纳入2014年至2018年在南非彼得马里茨堡Edendale医院重症监护室(ICU)住院的成年患者。采用多变量logistic回归分析qSOFA与icu死亡率的关系。使用受试者工作特征曲线下的面积和使用似然比检验对基线模型的附加贡献来评估歧视。结果:qSOFA评分0、1和2与icu内死亡率增加的几率无关(调整优势比(aOR) 1.24, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.86 - 1.79;p=0.26),而qSOFA为3与感染患者icu内死亡率相关(aOR为2.82;95% ci 1.91 - 4.16;结论:在SA资源有限的公立医院中,qSOFA与有感染和无感染患者的icu死亡率相关,但具有弱判别性。这些发现增加了越来越多的证据,支持在资源有限的环境中使用qSOFA提供低成本、高价值的重症监护。本研究的贡献:本研究扩大了支持qSOFA在资源有限的环境中使用的数据,超出了急诊科或病房,纳入了ICU住院的患者。此外,该研究表明,在没有疑似或确诊感染的创伤入院患者群体中,qSOFA具有更强的预测能力,从而为更广泛的人群提供了qSOFA作为风险预测工具的额外用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relevance and application of clinical practice guidelines in different settings. Deep medicine … Navigating the intersection of technology, cognition and ethics in the digital age of medicine. The missed art of care? Prevalence and independent predictors of in-hospital stroke among patients who developed acute alteration of consciousness in the medical intensive care unit: A retrospective case-control study. Carbon dioxide levels of ventilated adult critically ill post-operative patients on arrival at the intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1