Gender Differences and Roles of Two Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Predicting Post-College Outcomes.

IF 2.2 4区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Experimental Education Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00220973.2020.1808944
Kristy A Robinson, Tony Perez, Arianna White-Levatich, Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
{"title":"Gender Differences and Roles of Two Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Predicting Post-College Outcomes.","authors":"Kristy A Robinson,&nbsp;Tony Perez,&nbsp;Arianna White-Levatich,&nbsp;Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia","doi":"10.1080/00220973.2020.1808944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The end of college is a key transition point when students prepare for the workforce or graduate school, and when competence beliefs that have been shaped throughout college play a particularly important role in decision-making processes. This study examined the roles of two competence beliefs, self-efficacy for scientific tasks and science academic self-efficacy, during the final year of college. A structural equation model was used to examine science research self-efficacy and science academic self-efficacy as predictors of post-graduation science career intentions and life satisfaction; prior achievement was also included as a predictor of competence beliefs and post-graduation outcomes. Findings indicated that both types of self-efficacy predicted career intentions and life satisfaction. To better understand the processes that contribute to gender gaps in certain science careers, gender differences in mean levels of self-efficacy and in the structural relations among the variables of interest were examined using multi-group analyses. Females reported lower academic self-efficacy, despite having similar levels of prior achievement and outcomes; structural relations also appeared to vary by gender. Results extend theoretical understanding of the roles of two distinct forms of self-efficacy and the potential mechanisms explaining gender gaps in science fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":47911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"90 2","pages":"344-363"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00220973.2020.1808944","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1808944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The end of college is a key transition point when students prepare for the workforce or graduate school, and when competence beliefs that have been shaped throughout college play a particularly important role in decision-making processes. This study examined the roles of two competence beliefs, self-efficacy for scientific tasks and science academic self-efficacy, during the final year of college. A structural equation model was used to examine science research self-efficacy and science academic self-efficacy as predictors of post-graduation science career intentions and life satisfaction; prior achievement was also included as a predictor of competence beliefs and post-graduation outcomes. Findings indicated that both types of self-efficacy predicted career intentions and life satisfaction. To better understand the processes that contribute to gender gaps in certain science careers, gender differences in mean levels of self-efficacy and in the structural relations among the variables of interest were examined using multi-group analyses. Females reported lower academic self-efficacy, despite having similar levels of prior achievement and outcomes; structural relations also appeared to vary by gender. Results extend theoretical understanding of the roles of two distinct forms of self-efficacy and the potential mechanisms explaining gender gaps in science fields.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种科学自我效能信念在预测大学毕业后成就中的性别差异及作用
大学毕业是学生准备进入职场或读研的关键转折点,在大学期间形成的能力信念在决策过程中起着特别重要的作用。本研究考察了两种能力信念,即科学任务自我效能感和科学学术自我效能感在大学最后一年的作用。采用结构方程模型检验科研自我效能感和科学学术自我效能感对毕业后科学职业意向和生活满意度的影响;先前的成就也包括作为能力信念和毕业后结果的预测因子。研究结果表明,两种自我效能感都能预测职业意向和生活满意度。为了更好地理解在某些科学职业中造成性别差距的过程,我们使用多组分析检查了自我效能平均水平的性别差异以及感兴趣变量之间的结构关系。女性报告的学业自我效能较低,尽管她们之前的成就和结果水平相似;结构关系似乎也因性别而异。研究结果扩展了对两种不同形式的自我效能的理论理解,以及解释科学领域性别差距的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Education publishes theoretical, laboratory, and classroom research studies that use the range of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Recent articles have explored the correlation between test preparation and performance, enhancing students" self-efficacy, the effects of peer collaboration among students, and arguments about statistical significance and effect size reporting. In recent issues, JXE has published examinations of statistical methodologies and editorial practices used in several educational research journals.
期刊最新文献
Full-Structured or Supported by Incremental Scaffolds? Effects on Perceived Competence and Motivation Same Classroom, Different Affordances? Demographic Differences in Perceptions of Motivational Climate in Five STEM Courses Newton Makes Me Happy: Cycling Emotions during Science Text Reading Working Memory and Automaticity in Relation to Mental Addition among American Elementary Students Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates ofpsychological morbidity after intensive care unit stay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1