Theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s11764-023-01390-5
Bruno Rodrigues, Eliana V Carraça, Beatriz B Francisco, Inês Nobre, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Inês Santos
{"title":"Theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review.","authors":"Bruno Rodrigues, Eliana V Carraça, Beatriz B Francisco, Inês Nobre, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Inês Santos","doi":"10.1007/s11764-023-01390-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Theory-based interventions aimed at promoting health behavior change in cancer survivors seem to be effective but remain scarce. More information on intervention features is also needed. This review aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of theory-based interventions (and its features) on physical activity (PA) and/or diet behaviors in cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search in three databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) identified studies that (i) targeted adult cancer survivors and (ii) included theory-based randomized controlled trials designed to influence PA, diet, or weight management. A qualitative synthesis of interventions' effectiveness, extensiveness of theory use, and applied intervention techniques was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies were included. Socio-Cognitive Theory was the most used theory, showing promising results in PA-only trials and mixed findings in multiple-behavior interventions. Mixed findings were observed for interventions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Transtheoretical Model. Limited findings were found in diet-only interventions. A large variability in the extensiveness of theory use, and in intervention techniques was found. Further research is required to understand how and why these interventions offer promise for improving behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Theory-based interventions seem to improve PA and diet behaviors in cancer survivors. Further studies, including thorough intervention descriptions, are needed to confirm these findings and identify the optimal features and content of lifestyle theory-based interventions for cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This systematic review can contribute to the development of more effective interventions to promote long-term adherence to healthy lifestyle behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01390-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Theory-based interventions aimed at promoting health behavior change in cancer survivors seem to be effective but remain scarce. More information on intervention features is also needed. This review aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of theory-based interventions (and its features) on physical activity (PA) and/or diet behaviors in cancer survivors.

Methods: A systematic search in three databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) identified studies that (i) targeted adult cancer survivors and (ii) included theory-based randomized controlled trials designed to influence PA, diet, or weight management. A qualitative synthesis of interventions' effectiveness, extensiveness of theory use, and applied intervention techniques was conducted.

Results: Twenty-six studies were included. Socio-Cognitive Theory was the most used theory, showing promising results in PA-only trials and mixed findings in multiple-behavior interventions. Mixed findings were observed for interventions based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Transtheoretical Model. Limited findings were found in diet-only interventions. A large variability in the extensiveness of theory use, and in intervention techniques was found. Further research is required to understand how and why these interventions offer promise for improving behavior.

Conclusions: Theory-based interventions seem to improve PA and diet behaviors in cancer survivors. Further studies, including thorough intervention descriptions, are needed to confirm these findings and identify the optimal features and content of lifestyle theory-based interventions for cancer survivors.

Implications for cancer survivors: This systematic review can contribute to the development of more effective interventions to promote long-term adherence to healthy lifestyle behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对癌症幸存者的基于理论的体育活动和/或营养行为改变干预:系统性综述。
目的:旨在促进癌症幸存者改变健康行为的基于理论的干预似乎很有效,但仍然很少。此外,还需要更多关于干预措施特点的信息。本综述旨在综合评估基于理论的干预措施(及其特点)对癌症幸存者的身体活动(PA)和/或饮食行为的效果的随机对照试验的证据:方法:在三个数据库(PubMed、PsycInfo 和 Web of Science)中进行了系统性检索,确定了以下研究:(i)针对成年癌症幸存者;(ii)包含基于理论的随机对照试验,旨在影响体力活动、饮食或体重管理。研究人员对干预措施的有效性、理论使用的广泛性以及应用的干预技术进行了定性综合分析:结果:共纳入 26 项研究。社会认知理论是使用最多的理论,在单纯的体育锻炼试验中显示出良好的效果,而在多种行为干预中则结果不一。基于计划行为理论和跨理论模型的干预结果不一。纯饮食干预的结果有限。在理论使用的广泛性和干预技术方面发现了很大的差异。需要进一步研究,以了解这些干预措施如何以及为何有望改善行为:结论:基于理论的干预似乎可以改善癌症幸存者的运动和饮食行为。结论:以理论为基础的干预措施似乎能改善癌症幸存者的体育锻炼和饮食行为,但还需要进一步的研究,包括对干预措施的详细描述,以证实这些发现,并确定以生活方式理论为基础的癌症幸存者干预措施的最佳特点和内容:本系统综述有助于开发更有效的干预措施,促进长期坚持健康的生活方式行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with anxiety in colorectal cancer survivors: a scoping review. Priorities for multimorbidity management and research in cancer: a Delphi study of Australian cancer survivors, clinicians, and researchers. Breast cancer survivors' exercise preferences change during an exercise intervention are associated with post-intervention physical activity. Theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review. Positive and negative survivor-specific psychosocial consequences of childhood cancer: the DCCSS-LATER 2 psycho-oncology study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1