Home Health Care Clinicians' Use of Judgment Language for Black and Hispanic Patients: Natural Language Processing Study.

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.2196/42552
Maxim Topaz, Jiyoun Song, Anahita Davoudi, Margaret McDonald, Jacquelyn Taylor, Scott Sittig, Kathryn Bowles
{"title":"Home Health Care Clinicians' Use of Judgment Language for Black and Hispanic Patients: Natural Language Processing Study.","authors":"Maxim Topaz, Jiyoun Song, Anahita Davoudi, Margaret McDonald, Jacquelyn Taylor, Scott Sittig, Kathryn Bowles","doi":"10.2196/42552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A clinician's biased behavior toward patients can affect the quality of care. Recent literature reviews report on widespread implicit biases among clinicians. Although emerging studies in hospital settings show racial biases in the language used in clinical documentation within electronic health records, no studies have yet investigated the extent of judgment language in home health care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to examine racial differences in judgment language use and the relationship between judgment language use and the amount of time clinicians spent on home visits as a reflection of care quality in home health care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective observational cohort study. Study data were extracted from a large urban home health care organization in the Northeastern United States. Study data set included patients (N=45,384) who received home health care services between January 1 and December 31, 2019. The study applied a natural language processing algorithm to automatically detect the language of judgment in clinical notes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of judgment language was observed in 38% (n=17,141) of the patients. The highest use of judgment language was found in Hispanic (7,167/66,282, 10.8% of all clinical notes), followed by Black (7,010/65,628, 10.7%), White (10,206/107,626, 9.5%), and Asian (1,756/22,548, 7.8%) patients. Black and Hispanic patients were 14% more likely to have notes with judgment language than White patients. The length of a home health care visit was reduced by 21 minutes when judgment language was used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial differences were identified in judgment language use. When judgment language is used, clinicians spend less time at patients' homes. Because the language clinicians use in documentation is associated with the time spent providing care, further research is needed to study the impact of using judgment language on quality of home health care. Policy, education, and clinical practice improvements are needed to address the biases behind judgment language.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"6 ","pages":"e42552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/42552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A clinician's biased behavior toward patients can affect the quality of care. Recent literature reviews report on widespread implicit biases among clinicians. Although emerging studies in hospital settings show racial biases in the language used in clinical documentation within electronic health records, no studies have yet investigated the extent of judgment language in home health care.

Objective: We aimed to examine racial differences in judgment language use and the relationship between judgment language use and the amount of time clinicians spent on home visits as a reflection of care quality in home health care.

Methods: This study is a retrospective observational cohort study. Study data were extracted from a large urban home health care organization in the Northeastern United States. Study data set included patients (N=45,384) who received home health care services between January 1 and December 31, 2019. The study applied a natural language processing algorithm to automatically detect the language of judgment in clinical notes.

Results: The use of judgment language was observed in 38% (n=17,141) of the patients. The highest use of judgment language was found in Hispanic (7,167/66,282, 10.8% of all clinical notes), followed by Black (7,010/65,628, 10.7%), White (10,206/107,626, 9.5%), and Asian (1,756/22,548, 7.8%) patients. Black and Hispanic patients were 14% more likely to have notes with judgment language than White patients. The length of a home health care visit was reduced by 21 minutes when judgment language was used.

Conclusions: Racial differences were identified in judgment language use. When judgment language is used, clinicians spend less time at patients' homes. Because the language clinicians use in documentation is associated with the time spent providing care, further research is needed to study the impact of using judgment language on quality of home health care. Policy, education, and clinical practice improvements are needed to address the biases behind judgment language.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭保健临床医生对黑人和西班牙裔患者使用的判断语言:自然语言处理研究。
背景:临床医生对患者的偏见行为会影响护理质量。最近的文献综述报告了临床医生中普遍存在的隐性偏见。尽管在医院环境中进行的新研究显示,电子健康记录中的临床文档语言存在种族偏见,但尚未有研究调查家庭医疗中判断语言的程度:我们旨在研究判断性语言使用中的种族差异,以及判断性语言使用与临床医生家访时间之间的关系,以反映家庭医疗保健中的护理质量:本研究是一项回顾性观察队列研究。研究数据来自美国东北部的一家大型城市家庭医疗机构。研究数据集包括在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间接受家庭医疗服务的患者(N=45,384)。研究采用自然语言处理算法自动检测临床笔记中的判断语言:38%的患者(n=17,141)使用了判断语言。使用判断语言最多的是西班牙裔患者(7,167/66,282,占所有临床笔记的 10.8%),其次是黑人患者(7,010/65,628,占 10.7%)、白人患者(10,206/107,626,占 9.5%)和亚裔患者(1,756/22,548,占 7.8%)。黑人和拉美裔患者比白人患者多 14% 的可能在笔记中使用判断语言。使用判断性语言时,家庭医疗的就诊时间缩短了 21 分钟:结论:判断性语言的使用存在种族差异。使用判断性语言时,临床医生在患者家中花费的时间较少。由于临床医生在记录中使用的语言与提供护理所花费的时间有关,因此需要进一步研究使用判断语言对家庭医疗质量的影响。需要通过政策、教育和临床实践的改进来解决判断语言背后的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unobtrusive Nighttime Movement Monitoring to Support Nursing Home Continence Care: Algorithm Development and Validation Study. Educators' perceptions and experiences of online teaching to foster caring professions students' development of virtual caring skills: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Assessing Visitor Expectations of AI Nursing Robots in Hospital Settings: Cross-Sectional Study Using the Kano Model. Calculating Optimal Patient to Nursing Capacity: Comparative Analysis of Traditional and New Methods. Remote Patient Monitoring at Home in Patients With COVID-19: Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1