Readability of online monkeypox patient education materials: Improved recognition of health literacy is needed for dissemination of infectious disease information
{"title":"Readability of online monkeypox patient education materials: Improved recognition of health literacy is needed for dissemination of infectious disease information","authors":"Jessica C. Frost , Alexander J. Baldwin","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Health literacy is key to navigating the current global epidemic of misinformation and inaccuracy relating to healthcare. The American Medical Association (AMA) suggests health information should be written at the level of American sixth grade. With the monkeypox outbreak being declared a </span>Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in July 2022, we sought to assess the readability of online patient education materials (PEMs) relating to monkeypox to see if they are at the target level of readability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search was conducted on Google.com using the search term ‘Monkeypox’. The top 50 English language webpages with patient education materials (PEMs) relating to monkeypox were compiled and categorised by country of publication and URL domain. Readability was assessed using five readability tools: Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), and, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG). Unpaired t-test for URL domain, and one-way ANOVA for country were performed to determine influence on readability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three of the five tools (FRES, GFI, CLI) identified no webpages that met the target readability score. The FKGL and SMOG tools identified one (2%) and two (4%) webpages respectively that met the target level. County and URL domain demonstrated no influence on readability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Online PEMs relating to monkeypox are written above the recommended reading level. Based on the previously established effect of health literacy, this is likely exacerbating health inequalities. This study highlights the need for readability to be considered when publishing online PEMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45006,"journal":{"name":"Infection Disease & Health","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 88-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9770025/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Disease & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045122001195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background
Health literacy is key to navigating the current global epidemic of misinformation and inaccuracy relating to healthcare. The American Medical Association (AMA) suggests health information should be written at the level of American sixth grade. With the monkeypox outbreak being declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in July 2022, we sought to assess the readability of online patient education materials (PEMs) relating to monkeypox to see if they are at the target level of readability.
Methods
A search was conducted on Google.com using the search term ‘Monkeypox’. The top 50 English language webpages with patient education materials (PEMs) relating to monkeypox were compiled and categorised by country of publication and URL domain. Readability was assessed using five readability tools: Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), and, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG). Unpaired t-test for URL domain, and one-way ANOVA for country were performed to determine influence on readability.
Results
Three of the five tools (FRES, GFI, CLI) identified no webpages that met the target readability score. The FKGL and SMOG tools identified one (2%) and two (4%) webpages respectively that met the target level. County and URL domain demonstrated no influence on readability.
Conclusion
Online PEMs relating to monkeypox are written above the recommended reading level. Based on the previously established effect of health literacy, this is likely exacerbating health inequalities. This study highlights the need for readability to be considered when publishing online PEMs.
健康素养是应对当前全球流行的与医疗保健有关的错误信息和不准确信息的关键。美国医学协会(AMA)建议健康信息应该写在美国六年级的水平上。随着猴痘疫情于2022年7月被宣布为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC),我们试图评估与猴痘有关的在线患者教育材料(PEMs)的可读性,以确定它们是否达到目标可读性水平。方法在google网站上以“猴痘”为关键词进行检索。根据出版国家和URL域名对与猴痘有关的患者教育材料(PEMs)的前50个英文网页进行了编译和分类。使用五种可读性工具对可读性进行评估:Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES)、Flesch- kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)、Gunning Fog Index (GFI)、Coleman-Liau Index (CLI)和Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG)。对URL域名进行非配对t检验,对国家进行单因素方差分析,以确定对可读性的影响。结果五个工具中的三个(FRES, GFI, CLI)没有识别出符合目标可读性评分的网页。FKGL和SMOG工具分别识别出一个(2%)和两个(4%)达到目标水平的网页。国家和URL域名对可读性没有影响。结论网上与猴痘相关的医学文献均高于推荐阅读水平。根据先前确定的卫生知识普及的影响,这可能会加剧卫生不平等。这项研究强调了在发表在线论文时考虑可读性的必要性。
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to be a platform for the publication and dissemination of knowledge in the area of infection and disease causing infection in humans. The journal is quarterly and publishes research, reviews, concise communications, commentary and other articles concerned with infection and disease affecting the health of an individual, organisation or population. The original and important articles in the journal investigate, report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonoses; and vaccination related to disease in human health. Infection, Disease & Health provides a platform for the publication and dissemination of original knowledge at the nexus of the areas infection, Disease and health in a One Health context. One Health recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment. One Health encourages and advances the collaborative efforts of multiple disciplines-working locally, nationally, and globally-to achieve the best health for people, animals, and our environment. This approach is fundamental because 6 out of every 10 infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic, or spread from animals. We would be expected to report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonosis; and vaccination related to disease in human health. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in this ever-changing field. The audience of the journal includes researchers, clinicians, health workers and public policy professionals concerned with infection, disease and health.