Follow-The-Leader Mechanisms in Medical Devices: A Review on Scientific and Patent Literature

IF 17.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1109/RBME.2021.3113395
Costanza Culmone;Fatih S. Yikilmaz;Fabian Trauzettel;Paul Breedveld
{"title":"Follow-The-Leader Mechanisms in Medical Devices: A Review on Scientific and Patent Literature","authors":"Costanza Culmone;Fatih S. Yikilmaz;Fabian Trauzettel;Paul Breedveld","doi":"10.1109/RBME.2021.3113395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional medical instruments are not capable of passing through tortuous anatomy as required for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery due to their rigid shaft designs. Nevertheless, developments in minimally invasive surgery are pushing medical devices to become more dexterous. Amongst devices with controllable flexibility, so-called Follow-The-Leader (FTL) devices possess motion capabilities to pass through confined spaces without interacting with anatomical structures. The goal of this literature study is to provide a comprehensive overview of medical devices with FTL motion. A scientific and patent literature search was performed in five databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, IEEExplore, Espacenet). Keywords were used to isolate FTL behavior in devices with medical applications. Ultimately, 35 unique devices were reviewed and categorized. Devices were allocated according to their design strategies to obtain the three fundamental sub-functions of FTL motion: \n<italic>steering</i>\n, (controlling the leader/end-effector orientation), \n<italic>propagation</i>\n, (advancing the device along a specific path), and \n<italic>conservation</i>\n (memorizing the shape of the path taken by the device). A comparative analysis of the devices was carried out, showing the commonly used design choices for each sub-function and the different combinations. The advantages and disadvantages of the design aspects and an overview of their performance were provided. Devices that were initially assessed as ineligible were considered in a possible medical context or presented with FTL potential, broadening the classification. This review could aid in the development of a new generation of FTL devices by providing a comprehensive overview of the current solutions and stimulating the search for new ones.","PeriodicalId":39235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"16 ","pages":"439-455"},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9541090/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Conventional medical instruments are not capable of passing through tortuous anatomy as required for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery due to their rigid shaft designs. Nevertheless, developments in minimally invasive surgery are pushing medical devices to become more dexterous. Amongst devices with controllable flexibility, so-called Follow-The-Leader (FTL) devices possess motion capabilities to pass through confined spaces without interacting with anatomical structures. The goal of this literature study is to provide a comprehensive overview of medical devices with FTL motion. A scientific and patent literature search was performed in five databases (Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, IEEExplore, Espacenet). Keywords were used to isolate FTL behavior in devices with medical applications. Ultimately, 35 unique devices were reviewed and categorized. Devices were allocated according to their design strategies to obtain the three fundamental sub-functions of FTL motion: steering , (controlling the leader/end-effector orientation), propagation , (advancing the device along a specific path), and conservation (memorizing the shape of the path taken by the device). A comparative analysis of the devices was carried out, showing the commonly used design choices for each sub-function and the different combinations. The advantages and disadvantages of the design aspects and an overview of their performance were provided. Devices that were initially assessed as ineligible were considered in a possible medical context or presented with FTL potential, broadening the classification. This review could aid in the development of a new generation of FTL devices by providing a comprehensive overview of the current solutions and stimulating the search for new ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗器械的跟风机制:科学和专利文献综述。
传统的医疗器械由于其刚性轴设计而不能像自然孔腔内内窥镜手术所需的那样穿过弯曲的解剖结构。尽管如此,微创手术的发展正在推动医疗设备变得更加灵巧。在具有可控灵活性的设备中,所谓的跟随领导者(FTL)设备具有通过受限空间而不与解剖结构相互作用的运动能力。本文献研究的目的是全面概述具有FTL运动的医疗器械。在五个数据库(Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science、IEEExplore、Espacnet)中进行了科学和专利文献检索。关键词用于隔离具有医疗应用的设备中的FTL行为。最终,对35种独特的设备进行了审查和分类。根据其设计策略对设备进行分配,以获得FTL运动的三个基本子功能:转向(控制引导器/末端执行器定向)、传播(沿特定路径推进设备)和守恒(记忆设备所走路径的形状)。对这些设备进行了比较分析,显示了每个子功能和不同组合的常用设计选择。提供了设计方面的优点和缺点以及它们的性能概述。最初被评估为不合格的器械在可能的医学背景下被考虑或具有FTL潜力,从而扩大了分类范围。这篇综述可以通过对当前解决方案进行全面概述并促进对新一代FTL设备的搜索,从而有助于开发新一代的FTL设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
31.70
自引率
0.60%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (RBME) serves as a platform to review the state-of-the-art and trends in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, which encompasses engineering, life sciences, and medicine. The journal aims to consolidate research and reviews for members of all IEEE societies interested in biomedical engineering. Recognizing the demand for comprehensive reviews among authors of various IEEE journals, RBME addresses this need by receiving, reviewing, and publishing scholarly works under one umbrella. It covers a broad spectrum, from historical to modern developments in biomedical engineering and the integration of technologies from various IEEE societies into the life sciences and medicine.
期刊最新文献
Foundation Model for Advancing Healthcare: Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions. A Manual for Genome and Transcriptome Engineering. Artificial General Intelligence for Medical Imaging Analysis. A Survey of Few-Shot Learning for Biomedical Time Series. The Physiome Project and Digital Twins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1