Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on carer-employees’ well-being: a twelve-country comparison

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Wellbeing Space and Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wss.2022.100123
Jerry Wu , Allison Williams , Li Wang , Nadine Henningsen , Peter Kitchen
{"title":"Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on carer-employees’ well-being: a twelve-country comparison","authors":"Jerry Wu ,&nbsp;Allison Williams ,&nbsp;Li Wang ,&nbsp;Nadine Henningsen ,&nbsp;Peter Kitchen","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2022.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this analysis is to assess the potential ways that the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted Canadian carer-employees (CEs) and identify the needs CEs feel is required for them to continue providing care. We assess the similarities and differences in the stresses CEs faced during COVID-19 globally across countries in the G7, Australia, Spain, Brazil, Taiwan, India, and China. We aim to compare Canada against global trends with respect to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the supports in place for CEs. The study utilized 2020 Carer Well-Being Index at the country level. Descriptive data on Canadian CEs is first reviewed, followed by comparisons, by country, on responses relating to: (a) time spent caring; (b) sources of support; (c) impact on paid work and career, and; (d) emotional/mental, financial, and physical health. The relationship between government support and emotional/mental health is also explored. When compared to pre-pandemic times, CEs in Canada on average spent more time caregiving, with 34% reporting more difficulty balancing their paid job and caring responsibilities. Seventy-one percent of CEs feel their mental health has deteriorated. Thirty-four percent of Canadian CEs received support from the government, and only 30% received support from their employers. Globally, there was a similar trend, with CEs experiencing deteriorating mental health, work impacts, and unmet needs during the pandemic. Comparing the well-being of Canadian CEs with other countries provides an opportunity to evaluate areas where Canadian policies and programs have been effective, as well as areas needing improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9729170/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558122000513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this analysis is to assess the potential ways that the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted Canadian carer-employees (CEs) and identify the needs CEs feel is required for them to continue providing care. We assess the similarities and differences in the stresses CEs faced during COVID-19 globally across countries in the G7, Australia, Spain, Brazil, Taiwan, India, and China. We aim to compare Canada against global trends with respect to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the supports in place for CEs. The study utilized 2020 Carer Well-Being Index at the country level. Descriptive data on Canadian CEs is first reviewed, followed by comparisons, by country, on responses relating to: (a) time spent caring; (b) sources of support; (c) impact on paid work and career, and; (d) emotional/mental, financial, and physical health. The relationship between government support and emotional/mental health is also explored. When compared to pre-pandemic times, CEs in Canada on average spent more time caregiving, with 34% reporting more difficulty balancing their paid job and caring responsibilities. Seventy-one percent of CEs feel their mental health has deteriorated. Thirty-four percent of Canadian CEs received support from the government, and only 30% received support from their employers. Globally, there was a similar trend, with CEs experiencing deteriorating mental health, work impacts, and unmet needs during the pandemic. Comparing the well-being of Canadian CEs with other countries provides an opportunity to evaluate areas where Canadian policies and programs have been effective, as well as areas needing improvement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行对护理人员福祉的影响:12个国家的比较
本分析的目的是评估新冠肺炎大流行对加拿大护理人员员工(CE)的潜在影响,并确定CE认为他们继续提供护理所需的需求。我们评估了全球七国集团国家、澳大利亚、西班牙、巴西、台湾、印度和中国在新冠肺炎期间面临的CE压力的相似性和差异性。我们的目标是将加拿大与新冠肺炎大流行的挑战以及对CE的支持方面的全球趋势进行比较。该研究在国家层面使用了2020年护理幸福指数。首先审查了加拿大CE的描述性数据,然后按国家对以下方面的反应进行比较:(a)护理时间;(b) 支持来源;(c) 对带薪工作和职业的影响,以及;(d) 情绪/心理、经济和身体健康。还探讨了政府支持与情绪/心理健康之间的关系。与疫情前相比,加拿大的首席执行官平均花在照顾上的时间更多,34%的人表示在平衡带薪工作和照顾责任方面更困难。71%的CE认为他们的心理健康状况已经恶化。34%的加拿大CE得到了政府的支持,只有30%的CE得到了雇主的支持。在全球范围内,也出现了类似的趋势,在疫情期间,首席执行官的心理健康、工作影响和需求未得到满足。将加拿大CE的福祉与其他国家进行比较,可以评估加拿大政策和计划有效的领域以及需要改进的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
期刊最新文献
Process and practice in New Zealand Enviroschool implementation The loss of rural vital places: A case study using the social determinants of health framework The contributions of community seed saving to health and wellbeing: A qualitative study in Thunder Bay, Canada Wellbeing and sustainability in Europe in the 2010s–An empirical analysis Spatial context and informal caregivers’ Well-being: A case study of a Carer Café project in Hong Kong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1