Employment Protection Legislation, Labour Market Dualism, and Fertility in Europe.

Elena Bastianelli, Raffaele Guetto, Daniele Vignoli
{"title":"Employment Protection Legislation, Labour Market Dualism, and Fertility in Europe.","authors":"Elena Bastianelli, Raffaele Guetto, Daniele Vignoli","doi":"10.1007/s10680-023-09662-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theoretically, whether a more loosely regulated labour market inhibits or fosters fertility in a society is ambiguous. Empirically, the few studies analysing the relationship between the strictness of employment protection legislation-the norms and procedures regulating labour markets' hiring and firing processes-and fertility have found mixed evidence. This paper reconciles the ambivalent conclusions of previous studies by analysing the impact of employment protection legislation and labour market dualism on total fertility across 19 European countries between 1990 and 2019. Our results indicate that an increase in employment protection for regular workers positively affects total fertility. Nonetheless, an increasing gap between the regulation of regular and temporary employment-that is, labour market dualism-negatively impacts total fertility. These effects, of small-to-moderate intensity, are relatively homogeneous across age groups and geographical areas and are especially pronounced among the lower educated. We conclude that labour market dualism, rather than a \"rigid\" employment protection legislation, discourages fertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":51496,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne De Demographie","volume":"39 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10160302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne De Demographie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-023-09662-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theoretically, whether a more loosely regulated labour market inhibits or fosters fertility in a society is ambiguous. Empirically, the few studies analysing the relationship between the strictness of employment protection legislation-the norms and procedures regulating labour markets' hiring and firing processes-and fertility have found mixed evidence. This paper reconciles the ambivalent conclusions of previous studies by analysing the impact of employment protection legislation and labour market dualism on total fertility across 19 European countries between 1990 and 2019. Our results indicate that an increase in employment protection for regular workers positively affects total fertility. Nonetheless, an increasing gap between the regulation of regular and temporary employment-that is, labour market dualism-negatively impacts total fertility. These effects, of small-to-moderate intensity, are relatively homogeneous across age groups and geographical areas and are especially pronounced among the lower educated. We conclude that labour market dualism, rather than a "rigid" employment protection legislation, discourages fertility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲的就业保护立法、劳动力市场二元化和生育率。
从理论上讲,一个社会的劳动力市场监管较为松散,是会抑制还是会促进生育率,这一点并不明确。从经验上看,分析就业保护立法(规范劳动力市场雇用和解雇过程的准则和程序)的严格程度与生育率之间关系的少数研究发现了好坏参半的证据。本文通过分析 1990 年至 2019 年期间就业保护立法和劳动力市场二元化对 19 个欧洲国家总生育率的影响,调和了以往研究的矛盾结论。我们的研究结果表明,增加对正式工人的就业保护会对总生育率产生积极影响。然而,正规就业和临时就业监管之间的差距不断扩大,即劳动力市场二元化,会对总生育率产生负面影响。这些影响的强度从小幅到中幅不等,在不同年龄组和地理区域之间相对一致,在受教育程度较低的人群中尤为明显。我们的结论是,阻碍生育的是劳动力市场的二元化,而不是 "僵化的 "就业保护立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: European Journal of Population addresses a broad public of researchers, policy makers and others concerned with population processes and their consequences. Its aim is to improve understanding of population phenomena by giving priority to work that contributes to the development of theory and method, and that spans the boundaries between demography and such disciplines as sociology, anthropology, economics, geography, history, political science, epidemiology and other sciences contributing to public health. The Journal is open to authors from all over the world, and its articles cover European and non-European countries (specifically including developing countries) alike.
期刊最新文献
Stratified Fertility: Age Norms, Ideals, Behaviors, and the Role of National Contexts. The Effect of Parental Caregiving on the Fertility Expectations of Adult Children. Overqualification Among Second-Generation Children of Immigrants in the Swedish Labour Market. Flexible Working Arrangements and Fertility Intentions: A Survey Experiment in Singapore. The Urban Bias in Latin American Avoidable Mortality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1