The new timing in acute care surgery (new TACS) classification: a WSES Delphi consensus study.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE World Journal of Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1186/s13017-023-00499-3
Belinda De Simone, Yoram Kluger, Ernest E Moore, Massimo Sartelli, Fikri M Abu-Zidan, Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Giovanni D Tebala, Salomone Di Saverio, Isidoro Di Carlo, Boris E Sakakushev, Luigi Bonavina, Michael Sugrue, Joseph M Galante, Rao Ivatury, Edoardo Picetti, Mircea Chirica, Imtiaz Wani, Miklosh Bala, Ibrahima Sall, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Vishal G Shelat, Emmanouil Pikoulis, Ari Leppäniemi, Edward Tan, Richard P G Ten Broek, Solomon Gurmu Beka, Andrey Litvin, Elie Chouillard, Raul Coimbra, Yunfeng Cui, Nicola De' Angelis, Gabriele Sganga, Philip F Stahel, Vanni Agnoletti, Alessia Rampini, Mario Testini, Francesca Bravi, Ronald V Maier, Walter L Biffl, Fausto Catena
{"title":"The new timing in acute care surgery (new TACS) classification: a WSES Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Belinda De Simone,&nbsp;Yoram Kluger,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Fikri M Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni,&nbsp;Giovanni D Tebala,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Isidoro Di Carlo,&nbsp;Boris E Sakakushev,&nbsp;Luigi Bonavina,&nbsp;Michael Sugrue,&nbsp;Joseph M Galante,&nbsp;Rao Ivatury,&nbsp;Edoardo Picetti,&nbsp;Mircea Chirica,&nbsp;Imtiaz Wani,&nbsp;Miklosh Bala,&nbsp;Ibrahima Sall,&nbsp;Andrew W Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;Vishal G Shelat,&nbsp;Emmanouil Pikoulis,&nbsp;Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Edward Tan,&nbsp;Richard P G Ten Broek,&nbsp;Solomon Gurmu Beka,&nbsp;Andrey Litvin,&nbsp;Elie Chouillard,&nbsp;Raul Coimbra,&nbsp;Yunfeng Cui,&nbsp;Nicola De' Angelis,&nbsp;Gabriele Sganga,&nbsp;Philip F Stahel,&nbsp;Vanni Agnoletti,&nbsp;Alessia Rampini,&nbsp;Mario Testini,&nbsp;Francesca Bravi,&nbsp;Ronald V Maier,&nbsp;Walter L Biffl,&nbsp;Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-023-00499-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely access to the operating room for emergency general surgery (EGS) indications remains a challenge across the globe, largely driven by operating room availability and staffing constraints. The \"timing in acute care surgery\" (TACS) classification was previously published to introduce a new tool to triage the timely and appropriate access of EGS patients to the operating room. However, the clinical and operational effectiveness of the TACS classification has not been investigated in subsequent validation studies. This study aimed to improve the TACS classification and provide further consensus around the appropriate use of the new TACS classification through a standardized Delphi approach with international experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a validation study of the new TACS by a selected international panel of experts using the Delphi method. The TACS questionnaire was designed as a web-based survey. The consensus agreement level was established to be ≥ 75%. The collective consensus agreement was defined as the sum of the percentage of the highest Likert scale levels (4-5) out of all participants. Surgical emergency diseases and correlated clinical scenarios were defined for each of the proposed classes. Subsequent rounds were carried out until a definitive level of consensus was reached. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to determine the degree of agreement for each surgical disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four polling rounds were carried out. The new TACS classification provides 6 colour-code classes correlated to a precise timing to surgery, defined scenarios and surgical condition. The WHITE colour-code class was introduced to rapidly (within a week) reschedule cancelled or postponed surgical procedures. Haemodynamic stability is the main tool to stratify patients for immediate surgery or not in the presence of sepsis/septic shock. Fifty-one surgical diseases were included in the different colour-code classes of priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new TACS classification is a comprehensive, simple, clear and reproducible triage system which can be used to assess the severity of the patient and the surgical disease, to reduce the time to access to the operating room, and to manage the emergency surgical patients within a \"safe\" timeframe. By including well-defined surgical diseases in the different colour-code classes of priority, validated through a Delphi consensus, the new TACS improves communication among surgeons, between surgeons and anaesthesiologists and decreases conflicts and waste and waiting time in accessing the operating room for emergency surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147354/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-023-00499-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Timely access to the operating room for emergency general surgery (EGS) indications remains a challenge across the globe, largely driven by operating room availability and staffing constraints. The "timing in acute care surgery" (TACS) classification was previously published to introduce a new tool to triage the timely and appropriate access of EGS patients to the operating room. However, the clinical and operational effectiveness of the TACS classification has not been investigated in subsequent validation studies. This study aimed to improve the TACS classification and provide further consensus around the appropriate use of the new TACS classification through a standardized Delphi approach with international experts.

Methods: This is a validation study of the new TACS by a selected international panel of experts using the Delphi method. The TACS questionnaire was designed as a web-based survey. The consensus agreement level was established to be ≥ 75%. The collective consensus agreement was defined as the sum of the percentage of the highest Likert scale levels (4-5) out of all participants. Surgical emergency diseases and correlated clinical scenarios were defined for each of the proposed classes. Subsequent rounds were carried out until a definitive level of consensus was reached. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to determine the degree of agreement for each surgical disease.

Results: Four polling rounds were carried out. The new TACS classification provides 6 colour-code classes correlated to a precise timing to surgery, defined scenarios and surgical condition. The WHITE colour-code class was introduced to rapidly (within a week) reschedule cancelled or postponed surgical procedures. Haemodynamic stability is the main tool to stratify patients for immediate surgery or not in the presence of sepsis/septic shock. Fifty-one surgical diseases were included in the different colour-code classes of priority.

Conclusion: The new TACS classification is a comprehensive, simple, clear and reproducible triage system which can be used to assess the severity of the patient and the surgical disease, to reduce the time to access to the operating room, and to manage the emergency surgical patients within a "safe" timeframe. By including well-defined surgical diseases in the different colour-code classes of priority, validated through a Delphi consensus, the new TACS improves communication among surgeons, between surgeons and anaesthesiologists and decreases conflicts and waste and waiting time in accessing the operating room for emergency surgical patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊外科手术新时机(新TACS)分类:一项WSES Delphi共识研究。
背景:在全球范围内,急诊普通外科(EGS)指征的及时进入手术室仍然是一个挑战,主要受手术室可用性和人员配备限制的驱动。“急性护理手术时机”(TACS)分类此前已发布,旨在引入一种新工具,对EGS患者及时、适当地进入手术室进行分类。然而,TACS分类的临床和操作有效性尚未在随后的验证研究中进行调查。本研究旨在通过与国际专家的标准化德尔菲法,改进TACS分类,并就新TACS分类的适当使用提供进一步的共识。方法:这是一项新的TACS的验证研究,由选定的国际专家小组使用德尔菲法。TACS问卷设计为基于网络的调查。一致同意水平为≥75%。集体共识协议被定义为所有参与者中李克特量表最高水平(4-5)的百分比之和。外科急诊疾病和相关的临床情况被定义为每一个建议的类别。随后进行了几轮谈判,直到达成了明确的协商一致意见。计算频率和百分比以确定每种外科疾病的一致程度。结果:进行了四轮投票。新的TACS分类提供了6种颜色编码,与手术的精确时间、定义的场景和手术条件相关。白色代码班被引入到快速(在一周内)重新安排取消或推迟的外科手术。血流动力学稳定性是判定患者是否存在败血症/感染性休克时立即手术的主要工具。51种外科疾病被列入不同颜色编码的优先类别。结论:新的TACS分类是一种全面、简单、清晰、可重复的分诊系统,可用于评估患者和外科疾病的严重程度,减少进入手术室的时间,在“安全”的时间内管理急诊外科患者。通过德尔福共识(Delphi consensus)验证,以不同颜色编码的优先级包括定义明确的外科疾病,新的TACS改善了外科医生之间、外科医生和麻醉师之间的沟通,减少了急诊外科患者进入手术室的冲突、浪费和等待时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
期刊最新文献
A new technology for medical and surgical data organisation: the WSES-WJES Decentralised Knowledge Graph Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) enhances hemodynamic stability decreasing analgesic requirements in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) Ultra minimally invasive surgical stabilization of Rib fractures (uMI-SSRF): reduction and fixation techniques to minimize the surgical wound Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a randomized controlled trial (SONOCHOL-trial) Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF): the WSES and CWIS position paper
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1