Association Between Body Tilt and Egocentric Estimates Near Upright.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Multisensory Research Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI:10.1163/22134808-bja10097
Keisuke Tani, Shintaro Uehara, Satoshi Tanaka
{"title":"Association Between Body Tilt and Egocentric Estimates Near Upright.","authors":"Keisuke Tani,&nbsp;Shintaro Uehara,&nbsp;Satoshi Tanaka","doi":"10.1163/22134808-bja10097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanisms underlying geocentric (orientations of an object or the body relative to 'gravity') and egocentric estimates (object orientation relative to the 'body') have each been examined; however, little is known regarding the association between these estimates, especially when the body is nearly upright. To address this, we conducted two psychophysical experiments. In Experiment 1, participants estimated the direction of a visual line (subjective visual vertical; SVV) and their own body relative to gravity (subjective body tilt; SBT) and the direction of a visual line relative to the body longitudinal axis (subjective visual body axis; SVBA) during a small-range whole-body roll tilt. We evaluated the correlations between performance on each of these tasks as covariates of actual body tilt angles. Our results showed a significant correlation of performance (estimation errors) on the SVBA task with performance on the SBT task but not performance on the SVV task at the group level after adjusting for the actual body tilt angles, suggesting a link between the estimates for SVBA and SBT tasks. To confirm this relationship, in Experiment 2, we further assessed whether manipulating the subjective direction of the body axis by providing visual feedback in the SVBA task subsequently affected SBT performance. We found that feedback in the SVBA task significantly shifted the SBT angles even when the actual body angles were identical. The observed association between SVBA and SBT performance supports at least a partially shared mechanism underlying body tilt and egocentric estimates when the body is nearly upright.</p>","PeriodicalId":51298,"journal":{"name":"Multisensory Research","volume":"36 4","pages":"367-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multisensory Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The mechanisms underlying geocentric (orientations of an object or the body relative to 'gravity') and egocentric estimates (object orientation relative to the 'body') have each been examined; however, little is known regarding the association between these estimates, especially when the body is nearly upright. To address this, we conducted two psychophysical experiments. In Experiment 1, participants estimated the direction of a visual line (subjective visual vertical; SVV) and their own body relative to gravity (subjective body tilt; SBT) and the direction of a visual line relative to the body longitudinal axis (subjective visual body axis; SVBA) during a small-range whole-body roll tilt. We evaluated the correlations between performance on each of these tasks as covariates of actual body tilt angles. Our results showed a significant correlation of performance (estimation errors) on the SVBA task with performance on the SBT task but not performance on the SVV task at the group level after adjusting for the actual body tilt angles, suggesting a link between the estimates for SVBA and SBT tasks. To confirm this relationship, in Experiment 2, we further assessed whether manipulating the subjective direction of the body axis by providing visual feedback in the SVBA task subsequently affected SBT performance. We found that feedback in the SVBA task significantly shifted the SBT angles even when the actual body angles were identical. The observed association between SVBA and SBT performance supports at least a partially shared mechanism underlying body tilt and egocentric estimates when the body is nearly upright.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体倾斜与近直立自我中心估计之间的关系。
地心说(物体或身体相对于“重力”的方向)和自我中心估计(物体相对于“身体”的方向)背后的机制都被研究过;然而,人们对这些估计之间的联系知之甚少,尤其是当身体接近直立时。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了两个心理物理实验。在实验1中,参与者估计一条视觉线的方向(主观视觉垂直;SVV)与自身身体相对重力(主观身体倾斜;SBT)和相对于身体纵轴的一条视觉线的方向(主观视觉身体轴;SVBA)在小范围的全身滚动倾斜。我们评估了这些任务的表现之间的相关性,作为实际身体倾斜角度的协变量。我们的研究结果显示,在调整实际身体倾斜角度后,SVBA任务的表现(估计误差)与SBT任务的表现显著相关,但在小组水平上,SVBA任务的表现与SBT任务的表现不相关,这表明SVBA和SBT任务的估计之间存在联系。为了证实这一关系,在实验2中,我们进一步评估了在SVBA任务中通过提供视觉反馈来操纵身体轴的主观方向是否会影响SBT的表现。我们发现,即使在实际身体角度相同的情况下,SVBA任务中的反馈也显著地改变了SBT角度。观察到的SVBA和SBT表现之间的关联至少支持了身体倾斜和当身体接近直立时的自我中心估计的部分共享机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multisensory Research
Multisensory Research BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Multisensory Research is an interdisciplinary archival journal covering all aspects of multisensory processing including the control of action, cognition and attention. Research using any approach to increase our understanding of multisensory perceptual, behavioural, neural and computational mechanisms is encouraged. Empirical, neurophysiological, psychophysical, brain imaging, clinical, developmental, mathematical and computational analyses are welcome. Research will also be considered covering multisensory applications such as sensory substitution, crossmodal methods for delivering sensory information or multisensory approaches to robotics and engineering. Short communications and technical notes that draw attention to new developments will be included, as will reviews and commentaries on current issues. Special issues dealing with specific topics will be announced from time to time. Multisensory Research is a continuation of Seeing and Perceiving, and of Spatial Vision.
期刊最新文献
Multisensory Integration of Native and Nonnative Speech in Bilingual and Monolingual Adults. The Impact of Viewing Distance and Proprioceptive Manipulations on a Virtual Reality Based Balance Test. What is the Relation between Chemosensory Perception and Chemosensory Mental Imagery? Evidence for a Causal Dissociation of the McGurk Effect and Congruent Audiovisual Speech Perception via TMS to the Left pSTS. Audiovisual Speech Perception Benefits are Stable from Preschool through Adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1