Barriers to and facilitators of using evidence-based, cognitive-behavioral anxiety interventions in integrated primary care practice.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Services Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-11 DOI:10.1037/ser0000696
Robyn L Shepardson, Terri L Fletcher, Jennifer S Funderburk, Risa B Weisberg, Gregory P Beehler, Stephen A Maisto
{"title":"Barriers to and facilitators of using evidence-based, cognitive-behavioral anxiety interventions in integrated primary care practice.","authors":"Robyn L Shepardson, Terri L Fletcher, Jennifer S Funderburk, Risa B Weisberg, Gregory P Beehler, Stephen A Maisto","doi":"10.1037/ser0000696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders and symptoms remains underutilized in integrated primary care (IPC), in part because the many treatments developed for specialty care are not readily translated to this unique setting. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to behavioral health providers (BHPs) delivering evidence-based cognitive--behavioral anxiety interventions within IPC practice. We conducted semistructured interviews with a national sample of 18 BHPs (50% psychologists, 33% social workers, 17% registered nurses) working in IPC in the Veterans Health Administration. We assessed barriers to and facilitators of using psychoeducation, exposure, cognitive therapy, relaxation training, mindfulness/meditation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based interventions, and problem-solving therapy. Qualitative coding and conventional content analysis revealed barriers and facilitators at three levels: IPC, provider, and patient. Themes suggested key barriers of poor fit with the IPC model, BHP training deficits, and lack of patient buy-in, and key facilitators of good perceived fit of the intervention (e.g., scope, duration) with the IPC model, BHPs feeling well equipped, and utility for patients. BHPs select interventions based on fit for the individual patient. Some results were consistent with prior work from specialty care, but the IPC model itself introduces significant implementation challenges. BHPs would benefit from flexible intervention options and training on IPC treatment goals and how to deliver the essence of evidence-based interventions in small doses. Our findings will help to inform adaptation of behavioral anxiety interventions to better fit IPC practice and development of beneficial training and resources for BHPs to reduce implementation challenges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"709-722"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders and symptoms remains underutilized in integrated primary care (IPC), in part because the many treatments developed for specialty care are not readily translated to this unique setting. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to behavioral health providers (BHPs) delivering evidence-based cognitive--behavioral anxiety interventions within IPC practice. We conducted semistructured interviews with a national sample of 18 BHPs (50% psychologists, 33% social workers, 17% registered nurses) working in IPC in the Veterans Health Administration. We assessed barriers to and facilitators of using psychoeducation, exposure, cognitive therapy, relaxation training, mindfulness/meditation, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based interventions, and problem-solving therapy. Qualitative coding and conventional content analysis revealed barriers and facilitators at three levels: IPC, provider, and patient. Themes suggested key barriers of poor fit with the IPC model, BHP training deficits, and lack of patient buy-in, and key facilitators of good perceived fit of the intervention (e.g., scope, duration) with the IPC model, BHPs feeling well equipped, and utility for patients. BHPs select interventions based on fit for the individual patient. Some results were consistent with prior work from specialty care, but the IPC model itself introduces significant implementation challenges. BHPs would benefit from flexible intervention options and training on IPC treatment goals and how to deliver the essence of evidence-based interventions in small doses. Our findings will help to inform adaptation of behavioral anxiety interventions to better fit IPC practice and development of beneficial training and resources for BHPs to reduce implementation challenges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在综合初级保健实践中使用循证认知行为焦虑干预的障碍和促进因素。
针对焦虑症和症状的认知行为治疗在综合初级保健(IPC)中仍然没有得到充分利用,部分原因是为专业护理开发的许多治疗方法不容易转化为这种独特的环境。本研究的目的是确定行为健康提供者(BHP)在IPC实践中提供循证认知-行为焦虑干预的障碍和促进因素。我们对在退伍军人健康管理局IPC工作的18名BHP(50%为心理学家,33%为社会工作者,17%为注册护士)进行了半结构化访谈。我们评估了使用心理教育、暴露、认知疗法、放松训练、正念/冥想、基于接受和承诺疗法的干预措施以及解决问题疗法的障碍和促进因素。定性编码和传统内容分析揭示了IPC、提供者和患者三个层面的障碍和促进者。主题提出了与IPC模型不匹配的关键障碍、BHP训练不足和缺乏患者认同,以及干预措施(如范围、持续时间)与IPC模型良好匹配的关键促进因素、BHP感觉装备良好以及对患者的效用。BHP根据适合患者个体的情况选择干预措施。一些结果与专科护理之前的工作一致,但IPC模型本身带来了重大的实施挑战。BHP将受益于灵活的干预选择和IPC治疗目标培训,以及如何以小剂量提供循证干预的本质。我们的研究结果将有助于为行为焦虑干预措施的适应提供信息,以更好地适应IPC实践,并为BHP开发有益的培训和资源,以减少实施挑战。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
期刊最新文献
It gives you a really great feeling, knowing that what you are doing is making somebody's day: Provider perspectives on implementing the individualized positive psychosocial interaction. Was training enough? Examining the implementation of evidence-based psychotherapies for depression in Veterans Health Administration. A systematic review of mental health stigma reduction trainings for law enforcement officers. Cultural Spanish adaptation, factor structure, and reliability of implementation science instruments for suicide prevention. Examining mental health engagement among veterans diagnosed with serious mental illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1